Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 个月前Discovery phaselemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageDiscovery phaselemmy.dbzer0.comUnpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 个月前message-square46linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarealiceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 个月前 I guess I’m an old. No, you’re right: afab and amab should only be used in contexts in which it is actually important information. E.g. medical. In all other cases it is unnecessary.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 个月前The presence of a prostate is relevant here though
minus-squarealiceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 个月前But that’s not what the original comment wrote. The presence of a prostate might be relevant, the assigned gender at birth is not.
minus-squarealiceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 个月前I’m happy that we agree, but there was no need to delete your comment :)
No, you’re right: afab and amab should only be used in contexts in which it is actually important information. E.g. medical. In all other cases it is unnecessary.
The presence of a prostate is relevant here though
But that’s not what the original comment wrote. The presence of a prostate might be relevant, the assigned gender at birth is not.
Nah youre right it was the wrong term
I’m happy that we agree, but there was no need to delete your comment :)