No. The Source WAS THE FUCKING ARTICLE I WAS POSTING UNDER. IT WAS THE POST. 10/10 ragebait. You literally made me start trying to develop new slurs for liberals based on your people’s inability to understand basic fucking context.
He stole and hid classified documents for potentially years so he could write a book. Oh, he also has a 45 year career of corruption, is one of the most right-wing US presidents in US history, and massively enriched himself even more than you might expect from the crawling pile of corruption that is the typical senator.
Show me where in the article they allegede your accusations, and I’ll reverse the ban.
No. The Source WAS THE FUCKING ARTICLE I WAS POSTING UNDER. IT WAS THE POST. 10/10 ragebait. You literally made me start trying to develop new slurs for liberals based on your people’s inability to understand basic fucking context.
Cool, with this example nobody needs to read any additional comments to understand why a mod would ban you.
Given your general illiteracy it’s no surprise you’re attempting to get out of reading more.
Tankies, man. The fact you just went through my entire comment history just to downvote everything is why you guys are getting boycotted.
Where did it say what you claim?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/19/biden-recordings-release-bid-fail
Your claim:
Show me where in the article they allegede your accusations, and I’ll reverse the ban.