• Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    He’s also doing it because it’s what billionaires want.

    Hmm these people don’t want to work a 996 to afford my enshitified garbage, better fund lobbying to starve them to death and if that doesn’t work I’ll make sure to fund propaganda to stoke racial tensions then just in case they get wise as a last line of defense why not fund the modern day Gestapo

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Times have changed since then though. Modern public infrastructure is a lot better suited for troop movements compared to the 1700s and 1800s when there was plenty of revolutions occurring across Europe. People seem to have this idea that they’re going to take out their guns and start guerrilla warfaring massive groups of armed troops.

        I do believe we need to be more aggressive, more proactive, but there is a good chance that it might be expected. It’s entirely possible that they’re just waiting for an excuse to start gunning people down in the streets.

        • Refract@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Right now the soldiers and ice feel invulnerable, untouchable. Imagine being a foot soldier in an area where most folks now want you dead. Doesn’t matter if its crappy hunting rifles shooting at you, they will kill you, they demoralize you. All of a sudden your brothers and sisters want you dead and you’re not quite sure what you’re even doing there. Worse, maybe you’re not onboard with all of the stupid shit Trump and his ilk are doing, maybe you decide you’re actually with the civilians.

          No question though, so much death is on the way, but the fight is worth it for our children and future.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    No funding, but there’s 40 billion to “buy” the election in Argentina…

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      And $300 million for a new ballroom, $230 million to compensate him for the FBI investigating his extensive criminal activities, etc…

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          That plane won’t even be available until he’s out of office, yet we have to pay for renovating it, so he can fly a palace around in his retirement.

          Unless he’s not planning on leaving. Suddenly he’s acting like he knows he has to leave after this term, but, y’know, he LIES.

          He’s not going anywhere, if he has anything to say about it. Out of office means prison, or worse.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Would be pretty strange if there were go fund mes around the world to feed hungry Americans meanwhile going into trillions of debt whilst holding the positions they do on the market and in WH. I don’t think a country could fail harder at sustaining a society. This is embarrassing. Even compared to Roman times. Like they failed… but not so stupidly. This is the stupidest fail ever.

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      lol gofundme. mabye realize its time to leave, or that it was time to leave decades ago when you were old enough to learn about the 2nd amendment.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    The US government seems to want people to violently revolt.

    I imagine they want to use it as an excuse to take absolute power. But I don’t think they thought it thoroughly.

  • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    House Republicans offered a bill to keep specifically SNAP funded while everything else is still under negotiation.

    Democrats declined.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not sure if you’re just blatantly ignorant of what’s actually happening or if this is just an attempt to smear Democrats, but it’d be nice if a Republican could take the extra 5 minutes to actually read about what’s going on. I’ll do it for you (you’re welcome).

      Sen. Hawley introduced the “Keep SNAP Funded Act of 2025” on Oct. 21st. It’s currently with the Senate Appropriations Committee, as of that time. It’s not likely to go anywhere though as REPUBLICAN LEADERS, are not prioritizing it. From a Politico article, there were several quotes from Republicans stating that they don’t want a stopgap, that it doesn’t actually fix the problem.

      But hey, it’s so much more convenient to just blame Democrats for every problem, isn’t it?

      Sources [Politico], [Congress.gov]

    • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Elections have consequences. If Republicans wanted a supermajority they should have worked harder on election day. Now they have to negotiate, they’re just choosing not to.

      • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe the democrats should have worked hard enough to get a majority. Or chosen to negotiate by allowing the bill for temporary snap funding to pass.

        The democrats blocking the last one is them DIRECTLY withholding snap funding until they get what they want.

        Their strategy, is that people are stupid and will blame the republicans for the actions of the democrats. More likely though, the democrats are going to give the republicans that supermajority in 2026.

        • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Maybe the democrats should have worked hard enough to get a majority.

          So the republicans are literally incapable of governing the country without a supermajority, but the democrats are? Who would vote republican then?

          Republicans control the house, senate, and presidency. Where’s the leadership?

      • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        They have 53/100 in the Senate, and because this is less than 60, it permits the FILIBUSTER to take place on the part of the democrats, who are refusing to let the budget go to vote.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Republicans tried to piecemeal their way to cutting the ACA subsidies. Dems actually resisted that bad deal for a change. If Trump is so damn good at making deals, why are deals not getting made?

    • stratoscaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      You might be the dumbest person on lemmy I’ve seen. Conservatives completely control the fed. They could do it if they wanted to.

      They’re using Democrats as a scapegoat so morons like you fall for the “but the Democrats won’t play ball” hook line and sinker.

      • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        What do you mean by this? The democrats are literally engaging in a filibuster. Did you not see Katherine Clark say “There will be families that are going to suffer… but it is one of the few leverage times we have.”?

        They literally just have to let the budget go to vote.

  • t3h_fool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    So, my first question is why hasn’t it been an issue before? Was the timing so that they wouldn’t miss a payment? Or was there a vote to make an exception for snap? Not in favor of this at all, I just don’t understand the mechanisms of a lot of this.

  • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Incase anyone wants to help their local community. I talked to my local food pantry today and they said they prefer financial donations vs food drops. They can make a dollar go further than we can at the grocery store

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Work with a food bank and this is spot on, except they do get food donations that make sense from farmers and food service companies. But people buying food at the grocery store will do worse than the food bank can do with their connections, experience, and volume.

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      This has real, “just think positive thoughts and go for a walk” messages posted towards depressed people vibes.