I am failing to understand how come a choice of a person or bad parenting should be enforced. Like if a person wants to drink more of sugary drinks he likes, it is purely up to him, right? Or parents letting their children drink as much as they want. That shit is purely on a customer. Why would anyone regulate that? Focus on other things like littering, public smoking and drinking, drug selling. This hast to be one of the least important things to regulate.
They can drink as much as they like. There’s nothing stopping someone buying another drink.
Obesity is a huge public health concern that should be treated seriously and we should be steering our culture into making better health decisions.
Because 64% of adults are overweight or obese, with 26% being in the heavier classification. It’s costing the NHS £11 billion per year, and 13% of hospital admissions in 2023 were due to being overweight. The cost to the economy through sick days, reduced productivity and death is around £100bn per year.
Yeah turns out people were incapable of making good decisions on their own. Which is fine, unless you’re asking everyone around you to pay for it.
So, free refills on alcohol is okay, but not sugar???
You can have free refills your beer but not your alcohol free beer lol
You can have free refills of coke if a bit of alcohol is added…
Please tell me it’s just England and Wales please tell me it’s just England and Wales
If customers are allowed to help themselves then it’s totally uninforcible. It’s not like the restaurants are going to police this and a sticker isn’t going to deter anyone!
Not at all unenforcable. Just needs an RFID on the cup or on a token handed out by staff.
Probably the best solution honestly… In chain restaurants that don’t offer free refills, I quite frequently just take one anyway. Nobody ever stops me. If I asked they might say no, but I don’t ask.
Pretty much no one will ever enforce it. It will be interesting to see what happens when some jobsworth does though.
Ol’ Nigel is chuckling his way in the front door, ffs. What is Labour doing?
Tackling a major health crisis?
being the continuity tory party, their role since 1997
An original consultation took place during 2018 as part of the previous government’s Child Obesity action, and legislation was finally passed in Parliament in December 2021.
The rules only came into force on Wednesday (1 October 2025).
The legislation was actually passed under the Johnson government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Johnson_ministry
I suppose that Labour could have passed a law canceling implementation, though.
But yet people are still allowed to smoke?
A bill to phase out smoking is working through the parliamentary process at the moment. It will introduce a progressive ban so those aged 15 when it passes will never legally smoke, licencing for the sale of tobacco and vape products, and the power to ban smoking near hospitals and schools.
We tried that in NZ, then conservatives got in power and just pressed ctrl z. Their argument was that tobacco taxes provided more income than that lost to public healthcare, but that was just a boldfaced lie.
Conservatives are literally a cancer on society.
Banning near hospitals should be a good one. Beggars belief it’s not already a thing.
When I’ve been, there’s a no smoking sign in front of the entrance and several patients stood in front of it looking like death having either a giant vape or chain smoking.
It already is in Northern Ireland
But i want to drink hummingbird food in large quantities in a single sitting!
How long before coca cola launch an unsweetened version and Nandos lets your Bring Your Own Bag (of sugar)?
This only affects sugary drinks, so their Zero and diet options should be exempt. Although a book I read recently was showing evidence that artificial sweeteners can also drive obesity, so we might start seeing things affecting those drinks too.
If you put sugar in granulated or powdered solid form into soda, it’ll create a lot of convection points and the soda will rapidly foam up and lose a lot of its carbon dioxide.
You could use a sweet syrup instead.
Sounds like a good ‘nudge’ law - David Cameron would be proud
Well, yeah since Cameron was the one who introduced the legislation.
If Im ever denied my sugar water at a restaurant i will simply cry, scream, piss, shit and fart until I have my way or am forced to leave
Average hexbear user.
Although kinda based…
Does that mean the diet versions are unaffected?
taking away your cup in communist ingerlund
They should offer a loisence for 1 extra sugar drink if you finish your mushy peas.
Maybe now the UK will catch on to iced tea? Free refills!
As long as there’s no sugar, because it’s only sugary drinks being banned.
One 20 floz Arizona Ice Tea has 59g of sugar (2.95g per floz), one 12 floz Coca Cola has 37g (3.08g per floz).
If you think Ice Tea is somehow healthy, I got news for you.
Unsweetened tea is a thing. Sugar free iced tea is a thing. Herbal iced tea is a thing.
No sugar tonight (in my tea)
59 / 37 = 2
it’s double healthy
Begone, devil.
The notice reads: “Want Coca-Cola Classic? It’s one glass only.
“Based on new government laws, we’ve had to limit Coca-Cola Classic to one glass per customer.
“Still thirsty? Help yourself to any of our low-sugar fizzy Bottomless Soft Drinks.”
Under the new rules, any soft drinks that are low in sugar, for example ‘Zero’ alternative versions of most popular soft drink brands, can be drunk to one’s heart’s content.
I imagine that manufacturers of artificial sweeteners are in for a good time.
