• thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      None of them stand behind anything but money.

      I recently cut a new friend from my life, went from normal seeming dude to full trumpism, I guess I just didn’t see it before. Told him I don’t associate with trump supporters and blocked his number. He said he shouldn’t have brought up politics.

      No man, be proud of the shit you believe in, don’t hide it! You voted for hatred, stand behind it! It’s everyone else that’s wrong!

      Fuck em. Stand up for what you believe in and either receive the hatred happily or reevaluate why you’re getting shit on. Being a decent human doesn’t cost much at all.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fascism also implies state control of the economy, so nah this is very in line with historical fascist states.

      The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State–a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values–interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.

      Fascism is definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the political and economic sphere. (p. 32)

      The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporate, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organised in their respective associations, circulate within the State. (p. 41).

      -Mussolini https://politicalresearch.org/2005/01/12/mussolini-corporate-state

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed, Mussolini was the Little Austrian Corporal’s mentor. The German worker was making less than they did during the Great Depression. MAGA will do the same in the USA.

  • azuth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does not get you control, this is just the government giving money to big corporations which is perfectly in line with actual capitalism (as.practiced, not the fairy tale version).

    Real capitalists will also have no problem with the government taking over a failing company, paying off it’s debts and later selling it at a loss to them.

    • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Government ownership over industry where they do have direct control would still be capitalism though, as long as commodity production, wage labor and markets exist, since that’s what actually defines it. Ownership alone isn’t relevant.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically you could still have commodity production, wage labor, and markets under other systems such as under market socialism and various forms of anarchism that use markets as an economic driver.

        • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Calling a system something else doesn’t make it different, all of these are still fundamentally capitalist. Production remains commodity-based and mediated by markets, labor power stays commodified and exploitative (if not via capitalists, then via the state apparatus or the markets), wealth accumulation remains in place leading to inevitable snowballing monopolies and wealth gaps, etc.

          Only by fundamentally changing what things are produced for and how the goods are distributed (for example, instead of for profit we produce for use to fill people’s needs) only then does the system overcome capitalism.

  • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean yeah, he’s doing what leftists could only dream of, he’s destroying American imperialism

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point was to spread it to the whole world. Mission Accomplished!

      If you were paying attention during the Cold War when the US was overthrowing democratic governments and installing fascist dictators you would have already known.

      The war is over there is no need for central control anymore. Welcome to your fascist world.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    From my post elsewhere in response to Trump’s post.

    That’s socialism, right? Maybe not because the workers won’t own the means of production, the government will. Which is communism. Well 10% communism? Well, starting out at the introductory rate of 10%. I’m sure that Trump will demand more in the future.

    Remember when Republicans talked about the free market, government not picking winners and losers, free trade, etc? They are being conspicuously silent on the government taking over part of a major company. Imagine if Obama started buying stakes in companies? You don’t have to. The federal reserve did it via quantitative easing during the 2008 crash. They pumped trillions into companies to keep them afloat during Obama’s term and the Republicans that knew about it had a hissy fit. But they are all quiet now. Nothing to say. It’s okay for the government to have a little corporate ownership as a treat. Even though they called it fascism for years.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s socialism, right?

      The Marxist definition of socialism is that the government owns the means of production. That definition prevailed during the Cold War when you had such socialist countries. Communism is a utopian state which is promised to come after socialism. It’s the system of a post-scarcity society where you don’t have property because everything is abundant. The state withers away because it is no longer needed. Basically, it’s a society like in Star Trek. In Marxist thought, the development is: feudalism->capitalism->socialism->communism

      Of course, it’s not wrong using the term “socialism” more loosely.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Under any definition it is most definitely not something that would have been acceptable to most Republicans if done by a Democrat.

        • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. It’s pretty funny. It made me think of some of the rather conservative takes that are passed off as leftism on lemmy, which is how I got the title. Of course, meddling in the economy is straight fascism, too, of course. I really wish I had chosen something else now.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fascists calling eachother communists like this on Twitter while working class people cheer them on for being so funny is just not the future I envisioned or wanted.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck Newsom, but his twattering is apparently amusing to some of my very dejected friends who’ve been in a rut post-2024 election, and that’s worth something. Hopefully the combativeness spreads.

  • Overshoot2648@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d argue if Trump gets his way and becomes dictator for life. That’s more right authoritarian than left authoritarian.

  • Leet@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    America can only dream of being socialist or communist. Such a confused place that they can’t tell the difference between fascist and socialist

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All of his money is tainted and when it touches other money that money is then tainted. We should take away all that tainted money no matter who has it at the end. His grandchildren should know what it means to work or be destitute.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, calling the fascist doing fascist things as “socialism” is definitely not something that a party in Germany did in the 1930s.

      Why should we care if they like or dislike what we call them? No one is trying to convince the Nazis.

      Putting a hammer and sickle next to Trump is an insult to the number one Nazi killers in history.

      Socialist are the number one killers and fighters against Fascism in history. And second place isn’t even close.

      Trump using the government to increase the value of corporations is only “socialism” if you completely ignore everything that Marx or Lenin ever wrote.

      This is just more “socialism is when the government does stuff”. Zero understanding of class conflict and interest.