You must log in or # to comment.
How to order a hamburger that’s mostly spit
Juicy
As if they aren’t already.
Jeepers, your idea of your average hospitality worker is pretty dark
I was implying that the meat® is from all of the animal… Also, I spent over two decades in the food industry (US, EU, etc.). Ask me for stories — if you don’t ever want to eat at any restaurants ever again.
Yeah but lips and anuses aren’t spit, I think OP was implying that if you attempted what is listed about the kitchen staff are going to make sure the contents of their sinuses form the main protein of your burger.
Yes, and animal fluids, et al, are not generally accounted for in the minds of those that consume said products. For instance, are you aware of the “acceptable” volume of fecal matter in “fast food” ingredients? 🤔
I’m not going to say I’ve thought about it but I would expect it’s defined for a lot of countries (I’d be more worried if it wasn’t deck ed) and I’m going to assume in most cases it aligns with the regulation of fecal matter levels for other foods … unless a lobby group has convinced the relevant government body that they are mitigating it with some process like bleaching (also not great). But on the whole I would expect fast food meat to have the same acceptable level of fecal matter as mushrooms. Whether the level is a problem is going to depend on your country …
Boy wait until you find out what manure is
Yes, and fecal matter on food (meat or otherwise) has been the norm for all of human history. We just have ways of measuring it now and make rules about it.
That’s a very generous way of excusing corpo lobbying for barely-edible standards. 😅
They don’t have the time or hydration to do that to every order. They have to save that for the special customers.
I find it incredibly obnoxious when you are discussing or debating with someone and they start one of their replies with “so.”
Noted! I try not to be an asshat, but I can be a bit of a 'splainer despite myself.
So, I haven’t heard much about JP in a while,and now I’ve heard a podcast and this. Is it just coincidence or is there a reason we’re talking about him again? The podcast mentioned he’d gone on some show debating Christianity with 20 atheists. It went as you might imagine, where jp argued that atheists were Christian because they didn’t understand the thing they say they don’t believe in. Idk. Anyway – any other reason I’m hearing about him again?
This video analysing that is pretty good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrdOamPIRGY
he was seen crying while have an emotional outburst arguing someone recently.
It’s mostly just that. The whole thing was a mess. The atheists were told they would be debating a Christian and prepared as such, but he won’t define himself as a Christian. So much time is wasted dancing around that. They had to change the title from Christian debates to Jordan Peterson debates. On top of that he will barely engage properly, saying things like he won’t entertain a hypothetical because he wouldn’t allow himself to get in that situation in the first place. Just generally not acting in good faith.
The guy is a notorious rhetorical shitmuffin.
He just strings fallacies together and his crowd along.
After not receiving the fried Jordan cries in his car.
define cries
Whom is car?!
Sir… this is a Wendy’s
McDonalds marketing is getting pretty aggressive if they’re sending their cashiers to Wendy’s…
The cashier is working undercover in order to steal the krappy patty’s secret formula.
“What did you find out, Steve? Did you get the formula?”
“Yeah, commercials, we just need more than the other guys. I don’t think our food matters, like, at all.”
Fries are what the British would call ‘chips’ and the British are objectively wrong on this one specific thing
I’ll bite.
It might have been different a few decades ago, but in the UK these days fries are still fries. Nobody would ever ask for a Big Mac and chips. Chips are specifically much fatter ‘chipped’ potatoes. And potato chips are crisps.
So if we’re talking objectively… Fries are just the same US and UK. But US potato chips aren’t actually ‘chipped’, they’re very thinly sliced. And ‘crisps’ are indeed very crisp.
So I’d actually say the UK descriptions are more objectively correct.
I like a lot of JPs stuff l. He intruduced me to a lot of concepts but ironically i must warn that his content really is for the thinking man in the sense that you need to stay vigilant to spot the cintradictions with reality. Cleaning your room doesnt fix dating or the job market for instance and sometimes those realities that go beyond our own self discipline and talent really are overwhelming.
deleted by creator
might be you, bud
Mandatory straw man fallacy Wikipedia link.
Idk, does it still count as a strawman if you’re doing it to make fun of him rather than make an argument against something he said? I don’t think it does.
I just think relying on a strawman is not a very good way to make fun of something.
He says so much dumb shit that you don’t really have to exaggerate in order to make him sound stupid.
Nobody has to do anything. But this is fun, see? We’re pro fun around here.
Eh, I’d have more fun if we didn’t mention this asshat altogether. 😛
There was always the option of simply not partaking in the post or comments. Hell, you can even hide it if it bothers you that much.
Technically, yes, but we’re all supposed to be smart enough to understand context.
What if the straw man is more coherent than the person you’re making fun of?
Making fun of someone with an obviously fake conversation is a universal staple, from classroom to a boardroom.
+10 points if you do the voice, - 100 if the voice is a racial stereotype
Racial stereotype. What do you mean? Imitating an Indian scam call from a scam factory in India having a conversation with you is viable with an Indian accent if it adds to the story.
Every time I tell a story of a french person being upset about something minor I always add a french accent to help develop the story.
Telling any story of a cultural exchange with a monotone AI voice isn’t really normal.
Do I lose 100 points if I say “merica! Fuck yeah!” When I hear about us news?
-10 points if the person you are doing an impression of is standing right behind you.
+5 points if you realize it mid way through by the look on your audience’s faces.
It’s just you.
No, it isn’t.
True, but it’s mostly him.
No, anyone whose brain isn’t addled by narrative-over-facts finds making up fake conversations to support a narrative extremely pathetic and cringeworthy. It stands to reason that if someone merits being criticized for acting a certain way, then you’re able to use actual examples of them acting that way to make your point.
You likely only say what you did because you and the majority of your social circle are part of the above-described addled category.
It’s a parody not a made up example. It doesn’t prove a point other than accidentally showing your lack of understanding of basic storytelling.
Watching him debate those atheists was painful. His debating technique is beyond stupid.
- Make a statement that is at best wildly controversial and at worst blatantly untrue
- Redefine the words in that statement to make it vacuously true and completely uninteresting
- When challenged, say that you don’t care about common parlance
- Everyone loses, because this debate is now pointless and annoying
Yeah I watched the Some More News breakdown and it was certainly something lol
There is a great impression of him talking about Burger King that I have to share. He’s doing this same kind of stupidity in this video. https://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc
So close to the real thing that it wasn’t funny or entertaining to me, just another instance of me being annoyed by Jordan Peterson even when it wasn’t actually him.
False inductive reasoning combined with butwhataboutism and sealinoning. All designed to exhaust the opponent and muddy the argument. Conservatives love this form of argument.
Analyzing the conversation does not the joke get.
Yeah, I got the joke. I was talking about the inspiration for the joke that made it funny in the first place.
“Colloquialism, motherfucker! Do you spell it‽”
The “motherfucker” forced me to hear this in Samuel L Jackson’s voice.
lol the whole quote was a SLJ reference from one of his iconic lines, so you are right on the money
He shoots, he scores!
Define powerhouse
This is only missing JP coming up with a completely deranged definition of what fries are that he demands the cashier adheres to (I don’t think the vodka applies, that’s more making fun of the cashier). And also him entirely dodging the question of whether he likes fries, stating that people have discussed whether he likes fries but he refuses to reveal it.
Great. Make your own version and post it. I’d love to see it.
Obviously fries represent the western civilization. Frying oil is the chaos dragon of woke left that means to destroy the fries, but will instead transform them into something even more beautiful, an entity of culinary perfection. But you would already know that if only you had bought my online course. sob It’s so sublime. sob
looks like he came down from a benzo-booze binge.
