• germanixx@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “Guys let’s invite the pretty actress instead of a real feminist scholar or activist. At least we can rubberneck to look at her ass”

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      She’s literally been a major feminist activist and UN ambassador for over a decade.

      • germanixx@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The fact they hire an hollywood actress and fashionista instead of a proper scholar tells you how seriously they take feminism lmao

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          A woman can be smart or pretty but never both

          Not sure it was your intention but you somehow managed to make the most misogynistic comment in this thread by a pretty wide margin

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          a proper scholar

          She graduated from Brown and is currently working towards a PhD at Oxford, but yes, because she has had a job as an actor she can’t be anything more than that.

  • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just treat people equally. That’s it. Thats all anyone has to do. Male, female, any eye color, skin color, hair color, tall, short and anything in between. Just give all the same baseline and judge based on attitude and actions from there.

      • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. It’s simply egalitarianism.

        Feminism is focused one a singular aspect, which in itself destoys what it seeks to do by placing the topic itself as seperated from all others.

      • ghen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly this is the answer. You can look and also be respectful to the person at the same time. That is what both feminists and others want. Just not the bigots, they don’t know what respect is.

    • germanixx@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And a children movie actress lmao they wouldn’t invite real activist, no no, that’s boring, let’s invite the sexy Hollywood celeb.

      If anybody needed any proof lemmists are gross

        • Lady Butterfly she/her@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s why I said “looks like” and not that it is. Sad truth is LGBT people aren’t often found in jobs like that… and it would be statistically unusual for most or all of them to be LGBT.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            That’s why I said “looks like”

            Neither gender identity or sexuality is defined by appearance. That’s not any better. All you’re doing is prejudicially perpetuating stereotypes.

            I have a feeling if someone said that a person “looks gay” or “looks trans”, you wouldn’t defend them responding to being called out for saying that with ‘I didn’t say they are, just said they look like it!’

            • mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Neither gender nor sexuality is defined by appearance in general, but the straight white men do present themselves in a specific way.

              You are right to say that this might not be the straight white men’s club, but you would be wrong to say that the straight white men’s club does not look like this.

            • Lady Butterfly she/her@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Looks like as in appears, that’s how it presents which I could have worded differently. How likely do you think it is that they’re part of the lgbt community? And what insignia can you see indicating they support the community?

      • catty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Spoken like a true not-crazy-feminist who does not have a problem with straight white men and who thinks can tell a man’s sexuality by looking at him.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Foolish us. the traditional white male suit and haircut is how any gender that is fluid identify. how could we all miss that.

          Sorry your feefees got hurt that the attention was not on praising the white male at every given second of eternity. Not sorry.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some people just haven’t had the experience they just wish and wish but nobody will play with them. Others just play too much. I wish people would just be more open. Imagine a world where you could hear everyone’s thoughts like in the movies, but you would have to live with that in real life and so would everyone else.

    You would have to become very open to everyone’s real imaginative parts. Everyone would also have to be more conservative with their thoughts near others.

  • Atlas_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not disrespectful to look, and that’s all we can see these people doing from these two frames. Hell, it’s just about involuntary to take a glance.

    It would be disrespectful to stare or make comments/rude gestures, but I doubt that’s what’s happening here.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Also depending on the person they may not even be looking for aesthetic or sexual reasons. My paranoid ass involuntarily sizes everyone up for potential fights because I’m that fun type of paranoid.

    • Leather@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      She’s a moving object, our eyes are drawn to movement. She’s on the a stage. Most people in the room would be looking at her.

      • Zatore@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You could phrase that better than calling a woman an object. It’s true things that move attract attention, but don’t say it condescending.

    • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I thoroughly support advancing the causes of feminism and women’s rights across the world, and would happily listen actively to what she has to say.

      But also Emma is pretty fucking hot. And that fit looks good on her.

    • catty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re staring at something in front of / past her. Or it was shopped. These are smart, camera-aware men. Just another image created to instil hatred at men for feminists to rage on. Had it been about women hating on men, they would have been triumphant. All whilst men have to take whatever’s given by these chronically online ill-informed women otherwise such women are complaining the men can’t accept it.

      Go check out c/womensstuff for such loonies!

  • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Bunch of gross old men in charge of things are gross: more at 11.

    I’m glad you dudes are waking up to our reality tho :) welcome! We bake cookies! (Sometimes, if we feel like it.)

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well…

      Do you really believe that when you’re, say, 70 or so, that you won’t have sexual desires anymore?

      I’m sorry but it’s weird to me that when we see a group of grand mothers all together gawking and drooling over a young muscle pool boys, it’s all cute and yeah baby, go for it! When a group of guys do it, they’re old creeps?

      It’s a double standard, of course. And yes, by the time that you’re 70 you too will in part still feel like you’re twenty and if you see a young beautiful woman walk by, you WILL look, maybe even stare. If said young and beautiful woman is also world famous and dressed in a nice and accentuating dress… I mean, come on, really?

      I get it, this is about feminism but ffs we’re all still human. Everyone and their neighbor would gush over Emma Watson but just because btheae are a bunch of older guys its creepy?

      Just because these guys are obviously not the target demographic for Emma Watson (or are they? Loads of women are into that too, talking from experience) doesn’t mean that they don’t get to enjoy her looks by looking

      If anything you want to talk about why there are only old guys there

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    🤷 they may only get one chance to look at Emma Watsons ass in real life… They took it. Doesn’t make it right… I’m just saying.

  • meyotch@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    A true gentleman knows how to appreciate a beautiful person without giving themselves whiplash.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Just to be clear, feminism isn’t about not being attracted to beautiful women. It’s perfectly human to admire someone’s beautiful features, regardless of anyone’s gender. Feminism is about respect, equality, rejecting prescribed roles and limitations placed on gender, and acknowledging and addressing privilege and patriarchal systems of society.

    Notice none of those things means you can’t still like the sight of boobs, butts, legs, abs, biceps, or whatever gets you excited. It does mean that you shouldn’t reduce someone’s value to those things, nor should your excitement about seeing someone beautiful physical attributes become a problem for them, like if you harass them or catcall them over it, or worse.

    But Emma is well respected, not only as an actress but as an advocate, and she’s there to represent a great cause to the UN. They can respect her and her work and message and still think she’s a knockout at the same time. They’re not mutually exclusive, and that’s a pretty relevant part of feminism, divorcing worth as a person from sexuality and attractiveness.

    • Gollum@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay, but shouldn’t her speech about feminism be the reason these men are watching her, rather than her appearance?

      Yes, she’s beautiful, I get that. But in this case, she’s speaking about feminism and eaquality, and the first reaction is, “Oh wow, she looks good,” or “Damn, that ass.”

      I think that’s disrespectful and undermines the message of her speech. She’s not there as an actress, but as an advocate for women’s rights.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Arguably, the meme maker is the one framing a still picture as a sexualized moment and thus is the one creating the sexist narrative from a still that we don’t have the context on.

        • catty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Ahh I miss that 4chan meme. This whole thread is and it applies to about 95% of what’s posted on social media now. Back then it was Markov chains doing the heavy lifting, now GPTs.

          From looking down the accounts of people who actually post memes in /c/politics, their whole accounts look AI generated to blatantly manipulate users.

          • Not_Dav3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Ahh I miss that 4chan meme.

            I like all the variations of it but my personal favorite is this one :

  • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Admit it, you did it too. Nobody would’ve noticed where the politicians were looking if they hadn’t gone back and paused.

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Especially since the video shows they weren’t staring at her ass. You actually have to pause the right frame to get that misleading shot.

      • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        One doubts you get a position of public prominence if you have a tendency to stare, kinda off-putting to the general public.

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m gonna look at a thousand man asses, and no one can stop me. No prison can contain my sight, and no petty morality prevent its line from landing upon man ass. They’ll write stories about me. Immortalize me as the indomitable ass glancer. And you’ll barely be a footnote in my chronicle.

        Or maybe looking at a butt is inconsequential compared to actively listening to the human being attached to it. Not that that is necessarily happening here, what with the UK backsliding since this photo.

      • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Why wouldn’t it? Looking at people, especially ones you’re physically attracted to, is simple biology. After all, we’re still pretty much primates, even if we humans are able to build and fly spaceships.

        • germanixx@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          People doesn’t exist for your pleasure.

          Like instead of inviting a feminist activist, the porks invited the pretty actress so they can jerk off later?

          Bitch please

          • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            They don’t exist for my pleasure, but I am allowed to find pleasure in them existing. Doesn’t mean I have to stare at them, let alone get touchy.

    • catty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t get it - she isn’t that beautiful. Her arse is huge… and not particularly in a good way (the only people who say publicly in media are at the bequest of PR agencies she pays for because that’s how PR works) and would she be considered beautiful or revered if she wasn’t in a few films? I don’t think so. Beauty is everywhere. Those that are promoted by large film/music/media companies are not the prima talent.

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a friend of mine once put it, “you find a black woman’s ass on a white woman, you got something special.” And I never said anything about her being hot, but she absolutely has an ass you’d at least glance at.

        • catty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          But it isn’t anywhere near a “black woman’s ass”, it’s just wide. Source last partner black and know many black women, Jamaican and African and half-way between.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I challenge anyone, regardless of gender, to be sitting on that panel and not taking a quick peek.

      To me, Emma Watson has got to be one of the most beautiful people on this planet. And she’s also very pretty.

      But yes, the irony here isn’t lost on anyone.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, after watching her grow up through HP, I can’t help but feel little sister energy from her.