• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    My original point is: Communism isn’t automatically good just because capitalism isn’t.

    I absolutely did not get that meaning from your comment at the top of this thread, which was:

    No, but It beats communism any day of the week.

    • Wren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every shitty neighborhood has that one house that’s juuuuusst a bit less shitty than the rest.

      But it’s still shitty.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ok, but that seems like a non sequitur. I don’t understand how your metaphor is supposed to help translate “[capitalism] beats communism any day of the week” into “communism isn’t automatically good because capitalism isn’t”. Those are two completely different statements.

        I think it would help me if you connected the dots more when you write things.

        • Wren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I was being sarcastic.

          Meaning:

          Person A thinks capitalism sucks because it has traffic, over saturated consumerism, and healthcare for profit.

          Person B thinks that communism has most of those things as well, and makes a point to insinuate that capitalism, while having those problems- is still better than communism when communism has very few examples of actually being any better.

          To further explain-

          Complaining about something while offering little to remedy the complaint is pointless. Therefore, I simply offered a counter argument that was at least productive.