no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agoLet delivery drivers keep theirlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkLet delivery drivers keep theirlemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareKirca@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days ago top 1.9% of only fans This is a complete aside, but does anyone feel like putting “top 2%” sounds better than “1.9”? Like when I hear top 2 percent I think wow this person is somewhere between 1.5 and 2% but 1.9 makes me think 1.90 to 1.99. Maybe it’s just me.
minus-squareThatGuy46475@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-25 days agoThat’s the idea behind significant figures in high school science 1.9 is more precise because it has 2 significant figures
minus-squarebitwolf@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 days agoI was going to say. I see so many touting this. Does OF tell everyone they’re top 1.9%?
minus-squarefrank@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoCompletely agree, the mystery makes me rank them higher than knowing
This is a complete aside, but does anyone feel like putting “top 2%” sounds better than “1.9”?
Like when I hear top 2 percent I think wow this person is somewhere between 1.5 and 2% but 1.9 makes me think 1.90 to 1.99.
Maybe it’s just me.
That’s the idea behind significant figures in high school science
1.9 is more precise because it has 2 significant figures
I was going to say. I see so many touting this. Does OF tell everyone they’re top 1.9%?
Completely agree, the mystery makes me rank them higher than knowing