• DustLuke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Instead of being in prison, they were dying out off hunger and concentration camps… There are idiots supporting US, and hypocrites supporting china…

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    1970 was during the cultural revolution. In that year, the world population was 3.68 billion, and the population if China was just shy of 830 million - China had 22% of the world’s population, so if they held (only) 20% of the world’s prisoners, they’d have a lower than average incarceration rate.

    The same is not true for the US today, we have less than 5% of the world’s population today.

  • veganbtw@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    ITT: Liberals who assume that evil Chinese MUST be lying about their statistics but the above board whites of the USA are not.

  • psychadlligoat@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ah, yes, good point! I shall now mindlessly suck off all non-western propaganda without thought, thank you for the awakening comrade!

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Which part of comparing incarceration rates do you take issue with? Why is acknowledging the difference “mindless?”

      • psychadlligoat@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I didn’t have any problem comparing incarceration rates, you’re pretty bad at reading if you came away with that. Not surprising from one of the people im mocking, though

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s all this post was about, though, a comparison showing that per capita (and totally), incarceration rates in the PRC is far lower than in the US Empire. The purpose is to highlight the hypocricy of those who hold the PRC as more repressive than the US Empire, when the opposite is abundantly clear to anyone looking at hard metrics such as incarceration rates.

          You decided to make a pivot in a completely different direction and just complain about Marxists, which just screams that you want attention more than anything. I suppose I’m providing that for you if that’s what you want, but really it’s just good practice to call out the incoherence of anti-communists.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The trick is to always assume “China is lying about its internal statistics” and inflate whatever number they give by an arbitrary large percentage. 1.7M is obviously an under-count because the CCP is always lying about everything.

      Also, you can do some broad brush “Everyone in Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, North Korea, and Taiwan are prisoners of the Chinese state, so actually that’s over 60M people” napkin math to make the numbers look better.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I think this is a good rule of thumb in general. When statistics agree with my preconceived notions, I consider them trustworthy, and if not, I assume that reality lines up with what I expect. For example, the referendum in held in the Baltics about leaving the USSR ended in favor of leaving, which I think is a good example of a trustworthy statistic. But the subsequent referendum in the remaining members ended in favor of staying in the USSR, and I think that’s a little suspicious, don’t you?

        • davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          When statistics agree with my preconceived notions, I consider them trustworthy, and if not, I assume that reality lines up with what I expect.

          I… thought you were being sarcastic. This is an obvious and severe flaw to have in one’s rational thinking.

          prejudice (noun)
          1. The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions.
          2. An adverse judgment or opinion formed unfairly or without knowledge of the facts.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Why would it be suspicious? Different members of the USSR had different national conditions, some were quite nationalist and opposed being a part of the USSR, some were more internationalist and wished to retain the Soviet system. In the following years, there have been many studies verifying that of those who lived through Socialism, the majority wish it had remained over the devastation Capitalism brought to the majority of people.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Doesn’t matter. I have spoken to people from the Soviet Union. I don’t personally need to be from the Soviet Union to read on its history, or the devaststion that came from its dissolution, and you saying you or someone you knew was from it doesn’t invalidate those I have spoken to and the research I’ve done. It’s lazy, anecdotes matter very little in the face of hard metrics and facts.

          • wpb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            It’s suspicious because it disagrees with my preconceived notions about communism.

              • wpb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                See now there you’ve made a crucial error. You’re recommending a book which, while it has some criticism of the specifics of how the USSR implemented socialism, on the whole it’s quite positive about the idea of establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat in general. Obviously that disagrees with my preconceived notion that humans are greedy, and that therefore capitalism is good, so I would never read a source that contradicts this, because I would have to dismiss most of it outright. And that’s just a hassle.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  I don’t follow, the author being positive about the working class running society rather than privledged elites having dictatorial control a la Capitalism doesn’t mean you need to dismiss the facts it brings up outright. Are you saying that, as someone biased towards Capitalism, you dismiss any criticism of Capitalism and any positive opinions on Socialism outright? If so, I can’t imagine how you live your life in other areas that contradict your current understanding!

                  To return, I don’t at all believe it’s suspect that the majority of people wished to retain Socialism, and this fact is further cemented by this same general notion being repeated over and over again in polling.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        No, Occupied China doesn’t control DPRK or ROC

        If we play that game we can’t trust American numbers either so the whole conversation becomes pointless

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m sure he hasn’t got a clue how many Chinese there are, or where China is.
        All that matters is China bad, commie bad

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Per capita is misleading, it over represents low populations and under represents high populations

        When you use it, it makes Canadian cities appear more violent than American cities as an example

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          And yet, the USA still the 5th highest in incarceration numbers and the highest in absolute numbers.

          I’d say that tells you enough

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Per Capita shows that China has a lower total prison population than a country much smaller than it in population. Both per capita and total counts are lower in the PRC despute having several times the population.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              What people feel to be true is often very different from what is actually true. You will not get anywhere by arguing with tankies, they’re not unlike MAGA.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                What’s your point, here? Marxists are bad because China has a higher population, meaning per capita comparisons are more accurate when directly comparing with the US?

                • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I haven’t said Marxists are bad, I’ve agreed that China is bad.

                  Are you planning on living in China?

              • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                Blue MAGA denying facts, literally the actual numbers and think that we just “feel’ it’s true” are pretty much the same as MAGA.

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Worthwhile note to people too lazy to click on the link is that this is the 2021 version. In June 2024 (which is linked at the top of the linked article) the numbers look a little different but not much better for the US.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s too hilarious it can’t be intentional that the top country not America is El Salvador which is where you’re questionably sending all your black and brown people.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I went to business school in the US about a decade ago (stayed full time engineer and happy about it) and I can absolutely see business schools unironically studying the process of privatizing and offshoring prisons as it relates to other more ethical and humane enterprises.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Interesting how it’s southern states at the top eh?

      Can’t have anything to do with the fact that the US legally allows prisoner slavery right?

      Winder what the race ratio of the prison population is.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Interesting how it’s southern states at the top eh?

        Legit amazed California wasn’t higher on the list. They’ve been doing mass-incarceration at an industrial scale since the 70s. But I guess the population is big enough that the per-capita statistics work out.

        States like Alabama, Louisiana, and Oklahoma have such small and anemic populations and dedicate so much of their domestic budget to incarceration that they’re basically giant publicly subsidized slave plantations.

      • maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        How is a per-capita incarceration rate, with a reference to the superset included directly on the plot, misleading? Other than including more than El Salvador for the sake of external reference, which is almost certainly a size issue.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Well yes because the US as a whole has a high number. If you added cities they would have even more in the high numbers. What’s the point about that?

              • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                Because US states have populations and areas comparable to other countries. Just the US topping the charts is expected. How many states you have to get through to see other countries is interesting.

                • sexy_peach@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  See? This makes it look like it’s as misleading as I said. This is prisoners per 100.000, that means it doesn’t matter how populous a state or country is. That’s exactly why comparing states with countries is misleading. For every state that has a higher number than the US average there’s states that have a lower number.

          • then_three_more@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            They are (which is the point) the countries are in orange USA (as an overall average) and el Salvador are the only countries that make it on to the list.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I thought the states were being compared to other countries. Didn’t look properly on the phone.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            They are, and I agree it’s misleading. It’s implying that it’s somehow shocking that the individual states of the county with the highest incarceration rate in the world also have a high incarceration rate. If it was absolute numbers, it would maybe make a point. As it is, it’s stating the extremely obvious and framing it as “look, it’s even worse than you thought”.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              If it was absolute numbers, it would maybe make a point.

              If you have a population with 10M people and 20,000 of them are prisoners, that’s significantly less concerning than a country with 100,000 people of which 10,000 are prisoners. You can’t make an apples-to-apples comparison between Texas and Wyoming with raw head-count.

              it’s somehow shocking that the individual states of the county with the highest incarceration rate in the world also have a high incarceration rate

              It’s shocking that the state of Louisiana has a full 2% of its population in jail. That’s twice the US national baseline.

              • LwL@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Yes, but that is not how the graph is framed. It’s framed as “look, if we put US states on a graph with other countries, they have such a high incarceration rate that there are almost no countries even on the graph!”

                If it was honest and just trying to compare the incarceration rate of US states amongst each other (and the national average) it wouldn’t be titled “[…] in U.S. states and all countries […]”. It’s a clearly manipulative title.

                The reason that a graph with this title could maybe make a point if it was absolute numbers is that most U.S. states’ population is less than most countries, so if individual states were still high on such a graph, that would be shocking.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  It’s framed as “look, if we put US states on a graph with other countries, they have such a high incarceration rate that there are almost no countries even on the graph!”

                  It’s certainly possible that you have one big state with a high incarceration rate - Texas or California for instance - that’s throwing off the national average. States are free to set their own penal process. It’s not a given that every state has a globe-shattering incarceration rate.

                  Saying “It’s not just one or two states with astronomical incarceration rates, its the whole country contributing to the total” indicates something notable about the politics and culture of the country as a whole.

                  Wyoming could have an incarceration rate of 0% without affecting America’s position as a carceral state. That it doesn’t is meaningful.

            • Hackworth@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              It shows which US states contribute more to the US incarceration rate and clearly shows that even those that contribute the least are above the majority of the nations’ incarceration rates. The latter is not obvious without visualizing the data in this way.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yes but that doesn’t really say much. We know it’s bad in the US. If all German states were bad that would still only tell you that in average it’s bad in Germany

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                not really. the fact that Louisiana has nearly double the rate of Oregon is significant. so is the fact that racist southern states are at the top and are the ones beating the us average.

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    UHHH THATS JUST BECAUSE CHINA IS LYING HAHAA YOU REALLY BELIEVE THEIR OWN NUMBERS LOL??? oh third parties provided that data…. UHH WELL THEY DONT HAVE IPHONES AND THEYRE ALL POOR. oh… wait, they do have iphones now and china has a stronger middle working class than the US and canada?

    hold on i need to go watch my tv for a couple hours to get a few more talking points but im gonna come back to this post and fucking own you

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      CHINA ONLY PRODUCES GARBAGE BTW. oh what? They have actually quality products, they just ship out cheap garbage to suckers?

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not saying the US isn’t shit with for profit prisons, but I’m not believing shit for any number that China provides on pretty much anything.

    • veganbtw@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Interesting because the number comes from the Institute for Criminal Research and not China, but go on with your total and complete acceptance of US propaganda and unfound hatred of China.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yes, because the ICR got their numbers from… going to each prison in china and getting their numbers then doing the math on each location to come up with…no they got them from the Chinese gov.

        Internment camps…are not educational camps … they’re prisons. Uyghurs are a great example of prisoners not being labeled as prisoners.

        …just realized you’re from .ml and this is memes on ml …fucking hell ml is a leaking shit hole.

        We don’t believe our governments propaganda…but we also don’t believe the CCPs propaganda either.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      To be fair, China is 2nd in overall prison population by country globally, so it’s not like their numbers are complete bs. I’m sure there is some fudging in what constitutes as a “prisoner” when they have “re-education camps” though. That said, the US’s numbers are fucking insane.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        they have “re-education camps” though

        Do they, though? You, as a champion of human rights in China, are aware that the reeducation camps are closed for years now, aren’t you?

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m sure the government that lied about wrongly imprisoning people in the first place is totally being truthful now.

          I wouldn’t take the Chinese or US government’s claims at face value.

          • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I’m sure the government

            I’d by “the government” you mean “The Washington Post” and much more western media, then sure

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/23/china-xinjiang-crackdown-uyghurs-surveillance/

            There’s an example article, a quick google for “China closed reeducation camps” will throw more results if you feel like doing a bit of research on the brave defence of human rights that you champion.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              And the information they publish comes from where exactly?

              There is no need for snarkiness, by the way. You act like Im attacking you directly. If this is how you communicate, I’m just going to block you and move on with my life.

              • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                the information they publish comes from where exactly?

                As per the article: “A nine-day reporting trip by The Washington Post through the region…”.

                I understand you’re not attacking me directly, but it’s so exhausting seeing the same talking points of concern trolls like you who have heard on reddit and Lemmy about the Uyghurs, and uncritically swallowed the western propaganda and champion the rights of an ethnic minority in China. And when confronted with stuff you don’t know, such as the camps being closed for years, you jump to saying “according to whom, to the government?” and when confronted with the fact that it’s western media publishing this, you go ahead and go yo claim “where does this come from exactly?” as if journalistic work wasn’t possible or as if the information wasn’t literally on the third paragraph of the link I sent.

                • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  As per the article: “A nine-day reporting trip by The Washington Post through the region…”.

                  Ah, interesting. My apologies, I’ve been driving all day and have been checking my phone sporadically and haven’t had the time to properly read the article. I have now.

                  but it’s so exhausting seeing the same talking points of concern trolls like you who have heard on reddit and Lemmy …

                  I totally understand, and I do apologize for propagating this behaviour. My knowledge was outdated and that’s no one’s fault but my own.

                  All in all though, my whole point is honestly just that I don’t really trust any government to be totally truthful in regards to information they share, regardless of whether that’s the US, China, or even my home country, and my initial assumption was that this information was coming from them directly. Clearly, I was incorrect in this case, spouted some outdated shit confidently, and I apologize. I appreciate your patience.

            • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I mean, googling that does not give the result you claimed it would. In fact, it talks more about how they opened up different types of camps instead

              • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                It talks about how they opened up prisons, which is exactly what this post takes into account. There are more people in prisons in the US than in the entirety of China.

                You clearly have done 0 research on this topic, and until 5 minutes ago you believed that the reeducation camps were still open and ongoing, despite them closing years ago. Educate yourself on the conditions of the people who you pretend to care about, or stop with your concern trolling.