• Jorunn@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    This one is fun because it could be both about tankies and actual leftists depending on what you believe in.

  • Donjamos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    That’s not only a problem of online leftists spaces. The left has always been pretty busy with discussing what page of the capital is more beautiful written…

  • rhvg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    online leftist

    Important things happen offline, online is more or less a distraction.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t know if that’s really true anymore. Or, maybe more accurately, I think we’re in between when that was true in the pre-social media age and when it’ll be true again after the social web breathes its last. There are just too many ways that megacorps, bad actors, and foreign agents can manipulate offline activity with online action.

      Some of those things are manipulating small groups into large-scale action (see: Qanon), but misinformation and meme warfare also have a measurable effect on election, direct action, etc. Not to mention that local organization is best done online, and that has a very real effect.

      Now, is offline action more important than online action? Absolutely, and if you’re saying that being an “online leftist” (as an identity) is a distraction, I think I agree with you. But online action is more than just a distraction, and to ignore it is probably counterproductive.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    The only thing more important than “do nothing wrong” is to loudly correct those who are doing “almost right” and “in the right direction.”

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I think it’s a tossup between “loudly correct” and “vilify as a disappointing libshit.”

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    obviously a trap set by bougie liberals to try and get me to vote for a Democrat.

    but i’m too smart for them

  • confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I had an interaction once where I thought I used double quotes around a word to imply something obvious related to the posted article. A random person got mad at me and claimed I knew nothing about solidarity.

    I felt insulted, they didn’t know my life experiences up to that point. I chose to ignore my feelings and pressed them to teach my why I was so wrong. They eventually disappeared from replies because they had nothing behind that image of righteousness. Rare win but I’ll take it.

    If someone put themselves in harms way to punch an authoritarian follower in the face in my defence and also uses slurs I could find offensive to myself, that’s not my enemy. That’s someone awesome who could use a little more education. Later. When the current situation isn’t so wild.

    Words are just words. That’s not as effective as punching a fascist in face.

  • known_unknown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Not to ironically quibble, the sentiment is there, but I think “more important to do nothing correctly than something incorrectly” is closer to the mark

  • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I spent a bunch of time in such spaces before the election and was shocked how much time and energy was squandered with virtue signaling and purity testing. There was literally no room for anything else in some of them.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I haved discussions with others here where its people are just not happy with baby steps and want full change right away. Problem is we need to make more friends not enemies with each other.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’ve started to make a habit on the internet to make amends and give grace to people who get upset in the comments as fast as possible. Textual online spaces are seemingly quite prone to disagreement, so it’s a huge help just to mindfully counteract that tendency.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It bothers me that I see genocide trivialize so often, like implying it’s a full step that needs to wait. The problem is that they would rather take the steps that help Israel commit heinous acts then start with small steps that benefit their constituents.

      Stopping the sale of weapons to a apartheid state committing genocide and condemning them is now seen as too much? I can’t expect anything good to come from them if that’s the kind of slack we insist on giving.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        They had the same foreign policy every administration since Israel became a country did but some people chose now to get upset about it.

        The world is a worse place now because Harris didn’t win.

        Biden second term would have be heaven compared to this.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          It’s almost like if blatant genocide changes the equation. Honestly, Israel should have lost our support a long time ago. It’s easy to see how deep corruption and most likely black mail had a big role to play.

          Yes, the world would be a better place with Harris at the helm. It’s a shame she tried her hardest to lose. FYI, I voted for her but I’m also mature enough to realize that she basically gave all her voters the finger and that’s why she lost.

          Keep blaming the evil voters who couldn’t stomach genocide and we will get the exact same play next election. You are enabling, not helping. It’s their job to get votes and care about our opinion ffs.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              I find it crazier that the dems decided to make genocide a voting issue in the first place. Weaponized incompetence, I swear. They could have told Israel to pound sand, but they chose a foreign state over us. They screwed you too man, have a spine.

              • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                but the democrats have to appeal to their zionist money-givers too! it’s difficult for them to strike a balance between the money-givers and the people who are supposed to vote for them.

                and the people who should vote for them aren’t directly hit personally by the israel genocide, so why would they care too much about that?

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                Yes, but it’s not the ONLY thing going on. Would you let the rest of the world burn to stop genocide in the middle east? I’m guessing not.

                So if there is a massive problem that we can’t directly take action to fix, you try to attack the source of the problem or other adjacent problems.

                This idea that the Dems need to be fully against it or I’ll never vote for them is naive. If the alternative is WW3 with 10x the deaths or continued genocide I don’t like either but I’m not going to sit on the sidelines while WW3 starts and complain about the dems stance as the reason I didn’t try to prevent it. Maintaining a moral high ground at the expense of people isn’t ok. Yes they could have done a million things better or different, but they didn’t. We had a choice to make with the options we had. Some people rejected reality and ushered in this shit storm so they could keep their concussion clean, it’s selfish. They’d rather have peace of mind than actually prevent suffering, because they had a chance to and didn’t.

                There are other people, other children suffering because of Trump that would not have been if Harris won. That’s just fact. Preventing him from getting in office or not, the events in the middle east remain the same, but those other lives impacted could have been prevented. We need to open up our world view and have it grounded in reality.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  So if there is a massive problem that we can’t directly take action to fix, you try to attack the source of the problem or other adjacent problems.

                  I think that is the crux of the issue. I don’t see condemning Israel and stopping the sale of weapons as some massive wall. The dems failed to take action and I’m taking action right now by holding them accountable for it.

                  The fact is they didn’t even try to solve the issue. Israel themselves admitted to it. I consider it their fault Trump won and even more people have to suffer. I see the constant scapegoating post-election as serving nothing except enabling them.

                  They need to be told their platform, built on foreign genocide and apathy, is literally atrocious. We need to demand change, not give them an easy way out.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Also, we don’t actually know which way we need to roll it. Some people have strong ideas, other understand the vague direction but there’s lots of invisible obstacles strewn across the landscape, and whenever we hit one there are a hundred different people with a thousand different explanations about what the fuck just happened.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yes let’s start a 3rd party

    wave of downvotes and idiots screaming about RCV even though that’s not a disqualifier

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      But you’ll continue to support democrats in higher offices until your third party has support in lower offices and a functioning party structure, right?

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        No!!! The lesser of two evils is still evil so I’d rather vote for a weak 3rd party candidate to help secure the win for the more evil candidate

        • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          If it were only that, but traditionally 3rd party candidates are all the rage 2 weeks before the US elections, and then the day after the elections they’re gone from the discourse, and you’ll hear nothing about them for the next 4 years.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Jill Stein is like a 4-year cicada cycle. She emerges, screams for awhile, then disappears again

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    How? You banned most of the guns, and most of you are anti gun to begin with. Shit, I’d be banned on Reddit just for typing that out. I’m not advocating violence, I just don’t see any other way to actually affect change at this point.

    Do you think we’ll actually get fair elections going forward? The last one might not have been, there’s a lawsuit and everything. I sure don’t think we will.

    I agree with the sentiment of the post but I don’t see WTF else we can collectively do about it.

    I will admit that the No Kings protests across the nation gave me a little hope, at least.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I fucking wish we banned any of the guns, why do you people just blatantly make shit up as if nobody would notice?

    • gazby@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      “Banned most of the guns” 😂

      Jesus mate, ever wonder why you get banned for saying something as demonstrably false as this?