• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      This would be diabolic. No one makes something due at a time ending 59 other than 23:59.

      I could totally imagine this happening by mistake, due to 12 hr time error.

      I wish people would talking in 24 hour time, even

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not really “diabolic”, its common in my highschool when class is in the afternoon and the teachers want to make it sort of like those paper homework where its due at class time, so you could technically finish it in other classes or lunch time before that class actually begins.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m personally a fan of the 12 hour format for casual conversation and 24h for anything else. 4 PM or 4 in the afternoon sounds better than 16:00 for casual speak imo.

      But man, I’m bad with the 24h format lol. I often need to consciously correct myself in that 18:00 =/= 8 PM.

      • Drew Belloc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        As someone who lives in a country that does not speak english and uses the 24-hour format, you don’t say “see you at 17”, you say “see you at 5”, you will know just by context, AM and PM does not make a diference most of the time thanks to context and when it does we just say “8 at night” or “6 in the morning”

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Frankly you don’t even need to use AM/PM for casual conversation… “I’ll see you at four” almost certainly doesn’t mean 4am unless it’s very clear from contextual information, same for verbally booking appointments

        It’s just things like travel timings etc which are likely going to be written anyway where you actually need that clarification