floofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1641arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1633arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square81fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarekernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down4·7 hours agoScience doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
minus-squarezeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 hours agoscience needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
minus-squarekernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 hours agoScience doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·5 hours agoNo it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
Science doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
Science doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
No it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
It can, but it shouldn’t.