Why are the journalist bending over to Musk?

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Because rules and decorum are what “good people” think is most important to protect rather than people and actual morals.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Funny thing about most leftist activist groups is they won’t take a hard stance because they are afraid it will dry up the money spigot by ‘looking bad’.

      And of course the virtue signalling and purity tests that inevitable result in them become taking fascist stances towards groups they don’t like.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Deomcrats have the center while republicans have the far right and to more than half a degree the far left (granted the more than are the true crazies who are so far left they go right and then the fifty is just the virtual effect of if I can’t have far left I will accept far right over center). The center wants a functioning government that runs by the rules set down by the consitution. Unlike some on the right who feels the constitution is frozen at the way society was at its birth the center looks for change by using the mechanisms of change put into the government. So many will protest but rightly view rioting as just hurting the common man. Musk and friends don’t live in neighborhoods that have ever been burned down by a riot. Its never even reached their gates. This is why luigi had such broad appeal. It was an action that did not hurt any innocents.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nearly 78 million people voted for this, and another 90 million stayed home and said they didn’t care.

    The whole point of democracy is to allow everyone to express their opinions through votes instead of violence. So either the election was rigged or the country wanted fascism.

    • im sorry i broke the code@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Considering trump sort-of gave an admission of that and there were reports about the hacking of the voting system before, I wouldn’t say “rigged elections” is that far off from the truth

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Evidence of significantly rigged elections would certainly be a cause for some significant action and demands for a new election.

        But I’m not talking about one-off reports of someone using their dead mother’s info to cast an illegal second vote. Even a rogue election official tossing a couple dozen ballots doesn’t really move the needle. We would need to see evidence of millions, or even tens of millions, of votes being impacted for that.

        And I can’t really say for sure whether that did or did not happen. But there’s not enough evidence to action.

        Instead, I look around at my neighbors, even in a blue city, and see tons of Trump signs on lawns, stickers slapped on cars, people wearing hats and T-shirts. That’s not enough evidence for me to definitely say there was NOT fraud, or even to confirm that Trump’s win is legitimate. But it does affirm that there are real-life people who have fallen for the propaganda. These aren’t just Russian spies trolling on the Internet or bots running on Musk’s servers to artificially update posts. These are real people who have chosen hatred.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The rigging wasn’t done at the polls. (The Democratic and Independent poll watchers would’ve reported that, and I’m not seeing any of such reports)

        The actual manipulation was the constant far-right propaganda made possible by the Citizens United ruling, which allows the rich to spend unlimited amount of money to spend on propaganda. That and voter rolls purges. These things have always happened to some degree throught the history of the US.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Because the left never does anything. They’ll whine and say this is unfair not how it’s supposed to be, that’s illegal. And that is as far as it goes. The right does shit and here we are. Only going to get worse and anyone who says ohbits only 4 years sure maybe till the next one.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    You’ve asked two different questions.

    1. Why don’t the democratic voters actually riot
    • First, riots are illegal. I think you mean protest.
    • Protest what? He was just elected president. A bit more than the majority of the electorate made this choice so we all have to deal with it. It’s called democracy.
    • He ran a relatively transparent campaign. So far, all he’s done is sign executive orders we all knew he was going to do. A majority of Americans voted for these actions.
    1. Why are the journalist bending over to Musk?
    • Why aren’t they calling his nazi salute a nazi solute? Fear.
    • I read an article saying Jon Stewart was the only one the mentioned Musk’s salute. I watched the segment and, while he did mention it, he did not call it a nazi salute. He tried to, in Jon’s funny way, make an excuse for what he was doing.
    • I suspect there are legal reasons for not calling this a nazi salute. Likely defamation.
    • There’s also people / organizations (like the ADL) who, for whatever reason, need to be kept in the good grace’s of these powerful people or who need to maintain their seat at one table or another.
    • seang96@spgrn.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      He lost the majority vote so technically not a majority of voting Americans voted for him.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Every single part of this comment just screams “It just wouldn’t be proper!”

      And I’m sorry, but I can’t seem to care about what’s “proper” when half my friends now have reasonable fear for their lives, not just “comfort of living” just because they are lgbtq+ living in deep red country.

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Protest what?

      Didn’t stop Republicans on Jan 6. The truth seems to be that one side is willing to do anything to gain power, and the other is unwilling to do anything to keep it.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Most telling move IMO is how they sidelined Tim Walz for being ‘too radical’.

        All he was doing was talking facts and smack. Democrats can’t have that! It’s not decent!

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t think there’s any contradiction there, though. The Dems aren’t rioting because they accept legitimate outcomes, while the Republicans are only accepting favorable outcomes. No one is rioting right now because the Dems accept Trump’s win as legitimate and the Republicans accept it as favorable.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      First, riots are illegal.

      Only if you lose. Get your man in power by any means necessary and he will pardon you.

      Protest what? He was just elected president.

      Trump losing in 2020 was the only reason needed for a riot.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You want the real answer?

    Inertia.

    Think about the scene in Fight Club where the homework is to go out and start a fight. It isn’t easy. Most people have never hit another person their entire lives. Men who punch walls or tear their shirts off to throw down with someone over perceived offenses are not the normal. That’s tail of the bell curve behavior. If it wasn’t, people would be fighting in parking lots everywhere you go.

    The inertia of most peoples lives is to avoid conflict. This is why only a handful of people in any building you happen to be standing in are suited to leadership roles.

    Now, if you can get one of those guys in the right conditions to stir up a mob hive mind then the game changes. Until then, most people will be propelled forward by inertia and conflict avoidance.

    • Josey_Wales@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is 100% correct.

      Also don’t discount the economic system working as intended. If I get off the hamster wheel to “riot,” my family quickly looses basic necessities.

      Once my best alternative to a negotiated resolution moves off that reality (meaning keep my head down and my family will get through this) more options become available. The system is designed to keep a critical majority on the wheel.

      • SDK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is exactly the reason these Natalists are “pro-forced-birth”. Childless adults are a threat because they don’t have to think about their minor dependents before revolting. They want everyone tied down with families so we can’t even consider getting off the wheel.

  • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think another point is hope, even if people start large protests, riots, etc. What can it achieve, who will achieve it? Short of a full revolution, will anything have an effect?

    Trump wont step down even if the country is alight, with republicans in power in senate they wont impeach or muzzle trump.

    Any sort of protests needs ro have a goal, something you can imagine it will achieve. If you cant picture anything postive coming from it, why would you want to?

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is it for me. I just don’t see an outcome where politicians respond to protests in any way other than doubling down and arresting them.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Would rioting actually make anything better? Seems like people have more to lose by rioting than they do by posting a mean tweet

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yes I love how America didn’t have a war of independence or a civil war. And it was all handled by paperwork. Ah what good times filing notiferizing it was crazy times

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Would rioting actually make anything better?

        Yes I love how America didn’t have a war of independence or a civil war.

        Why would we have a war over the elected president…holding office? Dems need to do better and win the next election, not start a civil war.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I agree, people disagree, seriously, I don’t care about the tweering stuff, but, say I gather 20-50 people and hold a demonstration at what, city hall? State Capitol? My local, and stae government wont change. So what am I supposed to do? go to a republican state and cause aimless mayhem? Am I supposed to take a semester off from college and work with the funds I do not have to travel to D.C. and what call for him to step down? His impeachment? Better accountability? He wont, his party wont.

      What’s needed is not a protests, not a demonstration, not even a riot could seemingly change this. Realistically it would need to be a revolution. and Realistically people living paycheck to paycheck are not highly motivated to throw away thier life so they can risk thier life to start a “revolution”

      • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Food is quickly becoming out of reach of many Americans. The conditions are becoming ripe for revolution. It’s no surprise cop cities are popping up all over the country.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Food is quickly becoming out of reach of many Americans.

          I’m not aware of any Americans worried their children will starve to death. Various housing and food assistance programs exist. Such apocalyptic language simply does not ring true.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    To what end? People were warned. People lived through 4 years of this. People remember the shortages and inept handling og COVID. People voted for this.

      • moncharleskey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Not to me, and not to them either. I already know, and Trump supports don’t care. These people don’t read history and were brought up through a poor quality education system that told them the US was the greatest nation on earth and we never did anything bad, and if we did, well, it worked out in the end didn’t it?

      • preach224@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i think their point might have been -

        you don’t have to, enough of this country either heard it and didn’t care, or just doesn’t care

        leading a horse to water and all that, maybe?

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    A lot of people are pretty pissed at the dems for not doing enough too. They’re so obsessed with being a party for everyone that they’ve become a party for no one, theres a huge divide between what people want and what they’re doing. They need to unify, organize and take some stances even if it pisses some people off. I think a lot of people are just demoralized and “politically homeless” as in they just don’t identify with either party so what is the point? What would be cool is if a bunch of randoms ran third party on their own ideas and formed a coalition but good luck with that

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Why are the journalist bending over to Musk?

    Because performative protest like wearing pussy hats isn’t actually as effective as general strikes or direct action.

    The McResistance fades because that’s all it ever was.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      It’s also far less effective than building a strong politician coalition, as Trump and his supports did.

      Frankly if I went to a MAGA rally I’d probably feel more accepted and welcomed than I by my fellow Democratic voters. And this is why Trump got so many votes this time. His supporters are enthusiastic, energized, and generally welcome to anyone who is angry and upset. Democrats kept chiding the voters they should be so lucky to have a black female president in such a great economy and if you weren’t supporting them you were a bad person.

      Frankly as a white guy from a working-class background, all the D have done for me is alienate me for 20+ years now. And tell me that I should vote for them anyway.

      Ok, you’re right in this sense. However, I meant beaten badly in the sense of expectations vs. reality. If you followed any media, it was supposed to be a slight edge for Kamala, or at least a good chance for an upset. In the end the R’s got president, senate and congress. And the outcome was clear after the first few hours, unlike something like Gore vs. Bush.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      God all the fucking rich elite throwing literally abortion themed parties around the DNC meeting before the election was so fucking tone deaf and the exact kind of thing people will use against the party in an election and yet they still went through with it because performance is all that they know.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Yes. Democractic establishment throws elections away rather than tries to win them. And frankly the professional elite base of the party is more than happy with it and thinks if you disagree with them you’re an uneducated sexist/racist.