• Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, some sort of highway crossing might be nice. But I mean, one of the big selling points of train tracks are that they’re relatively cheap to build (maybe more expensive than roads but still pretty good). Don’t see why it’d be a safety issue tho.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Highway crossing? You think that’s all there is to it?

      You got like a 10 acre parking lot, which to cross just that alone requires walking ~3 acres. Then you got a 2 lane service road, then a 6 lane highway to cross.

      And then there’s no room on the north side of the tracks for a train station, you’d still have to walk across the train tracks as well just to get to the train station.

      Gotta walk over 3 acres of pavement, plus 8 lanes of road, plus railroad tracks, all while toting your groceries? Yeah, ain’t nobody gonna take the train to Walmart around here.

      • Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Jesus christ, that sounds dystopian. Also, wdym walk 3 acres? Acres are a measure of area. They’re not even defined as a square.

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes I know. When I say acre in terms of distance, for one I’m implying a square acre (per side is ~208.71 feet, 63.615 meters), and for two, I’m only estimating anyways.

          Now that I look at the numbers, it’s probably an even longer walk than that, Walmart has a huge parking lot…