• skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ubisoft executives need to become comfortable with “not being employed.”

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some will take the blame, take millions as parachute payments, then the low level workers will have their jobs cut.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Unfortunately, that’s not how this works.

      This is late stage capitalism, execs are judged on how much money they managed to squeeze out before the company died. They’ll be hired immediately specifically to do it again somewhere else.

      The company dying in incidental.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Really sad because Ubisoft can make games, good ones even. But with out the freedom or time and now talent best they can do is movie licensed games.

  • THCDenton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Get rid of uplay. I might buy ubisoft games if they weren’t tied to that horrible service

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not just Uplay, but also their activation servers. Their games make calls to their endpoints to authenticate if you own/access the game and DLC. If those activation servers are decommissioned without a replacement, your game won’t activate and you’ll lose access to DLC.

      They announced they would do this for legacy games several years ago, and I was going to lose access to all the DLC I paid for with my Splinter Cell Blacklist game that I physically owned on a Wii U disc way back in 2013. Bought all the DLC because I loved the game. After enough gamer backlash, Ubisoft backpedaled and the activation servers remain for now. However, the concern is still there that I’ll lose the stuff I paid for when they decide they can’t serve it anymore or if they go bankrupt. Without them updating the game code or open sourcing it, I lose updates, DLC, etc.

      We need digital ownership reform, or else it’s piracy time again. This will especially be critical when Gabe steps down from Steam and new owners are appointed, or if Steam goes public.

  • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    they MBA’d themselves into extinction

    edit; everyone with an mba is only qualified to be a farm laborer

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hey now, I know a bunch of farm laborers and started out as one myself.

      They are nowhere near qualified for farm labor. That requires being able to work, not just regurgitate platitudes from the most recent bullshit management fad.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Every single MBA holder I have met has been a completely shit human being. Without exception.

      They’re qualified to be pig feed.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s a world where management is treated as an important but not godly position. Where they are schedulers and arbitrators of conflict, and where they aren’t free from consequences because they’re already at the top. And holy hell it’s also not the place where the position is used to promote someone out of where they’re useful simply because paying a labourer more than a manager is seen as unthinkable. It ain’t this one, but I like to think about it sometimes.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve always thought they do such a good job at building worlds but are absolute shit on story and content. I wish there was a way they’d just build worlds and then hand it off to someone who knows how to make a decent story. Valhalla and Odyssey had amazing worlds that deserved better stories

  • eletes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man Ubisoft could be so great but they just land so meh. Watchdogs, tom Clancy wildlands, the division, farcry. They all have potential but just don’t have that last 15%

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Company fails to generate infinite revenue even after implementing every abusive tactic known”.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Imagine, about five years ago, they peaked at $82.

      It was also during that time when they talked about getting into Crypto, NFTs, and all sorts of other get rich quick schemes.

      Now look at them.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      More like, company keeps pushing for short-term profits, runs out of goodwill built up in the past.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I want to say the same thing…

        But then you have like every other corporation on earth doing the same, and most of them see their stock price soar.

      • Aurix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ubisoft had many long standing issues, but disowning The Crew users was the worst possible move they could have made in their already dire situation.

        • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I played and enjoyed both of them, shutting down the first one instead of giving it offline functionality really pissed me off and was the final straw for me with Ubi. It had a fully offline playable story, NPC vehicles to race etc. and the game would’ve been preserved forever.

          Instead we got the crew 2, always online AAA signature garbage.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It feels tragic. On the one hand, they made some of my most favourite games especially the Splinter Cell series, and it would be sad to see a once great developer to go. But then on the other, the greedy bastards deserve to go under for ruining some of my most favourite games including the Splinter Cell series.

    But seriously though, if Ubisoft do go under, I hope that their IP would go into safe hands, like how Baldur’s Gate franchise has been handed over from Bioware to the competent team of Larian (and I do hope Larian does not enshittify unlike the fate of other companies, such as Ubisoft and EA).

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I do hope Larian does not enshittify

      They will, as the studio is close to be owned by Tencent now.

        • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The best thing about it is that they’re not making another BG just because they don’t want to. I think it is safe to say say that they won’t enshitify as long as Swen Vincke is at the helm.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They were decent to the Anno series, but honestly that’s probably just because they didn’t see the value in messing with the formula that Anno solidified around the time of the acquisition and it reliably boosts their numbers with strategy gamers who otherwise might not be customers of Ubisoft’s at all

    • Nikelui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If it’s any consolation, probably all the game devs that worked on your favourite titles have left Ubisoft long ago.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember “Far Cry Blood Dragon” as the only entry that really stood out. The gameplay was exactly what you described but dialed to 11 (as it should be).

      FC 3-6 … same game, identical mechanics, less over the top fun more boring and repetitive tasks. Somewhere at Ubisoft there is someone who is responsible for this, including all the consequences.

      • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        FC3 was a game changer. It was absolutely wild in its time. It’s just a shame that all of its successors went the same road… I stopper playing midgame FarCry V because it was… bad. The scenario was shit. The gameplay was shit. The map was huge but lacked substance.