She/her

  • 4 Posts
  • 239 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 29th, 2026

help-circle












  • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.workstome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    IQ tests, as I recall, are generally pretty decent at their originally intended purpose of predicting performance in the mainstream school system (at least up through high school, not sure about college), because the skills and knowledge it measures strongly overlaps with the skills and knowledge that match well with the current schooling system.

    People have subsequently attempted to take this extremely limited and borderline circular usage (Do well on your IQ test? Do well in school. Do well in school? Do well on your IQ test) to be broadly meaningful, which is deeply flawed in a number of ways. And now, of course, there’s attempts to update IQ to reflect a broader set of skills, which is sort of a step in the right direction but still fundamentally flawed in its attempt to reduce an incredibly broad set of different skills and areas of knowledge into a single number that you can rank on a scoreboard against others’ like that’s remotely meaningful.

    And of course, by skills, I mean not just the things it’s supposed to measure like math proficiency, vocabulary, etc., but also skills implicit to the nature of the test like focus, auditory and visual processing, ability to actually provide a definition for words vs. knowing how to use them but not knowing how to rattle off dictionary-style definitions, etc., all of which are also skills that are advantageous in our education system as it is currently structured but which aren’t really a measure of other areas of intelligence.

    Sadly, we as a society, at least in the Anglosphere that I’m familiar with, have a bad habit of prioritizing measurements that give us easy numbers to work with but don’t really reflect reality that well over more complicated methods of assessment that might be more difficult to work with but actually work better.





  • These are all gorgeous! Are they domestic or feral? They don’t fit the most common pigeon coloration I see in feral pigeons in the US, but I definitely have seen some feral pigeons with extremely unique coloration and it’s always so cool. (Though every single pigeon, no matter how “common,” is beautiful in my eyes. Unironically, they are one of my favorite birds.) Also, you might be from the UK or something, and I don’t know much about the state of pigeons there, or if you have any truly wild pigeons vs. feral ones.


  • I’m…confused. By “the person is complaining about rigged elections being fake news,” do you mean the journalist who challenged Trump on his claim? The specific exchange as indicated in the article was:

    The pair then moved onto discussing that riot, and Trump was challenged after he repeated his unsubstantiated claim that the 2020 election was rigged.

    Trump turned to the California primary elections, where votes are still being counted to determine which two candidates in a series of races - including governor of the state - will be on the ballot in November’s midterm elections.

    He said the results had not been called after four days, adding: “They’re cheating on the election.”

    “Do you have evidence to support that?” Welker responded.

    “All I have to do is look, and I listen,” the president replied.

    “But that’s not evidence,” she interjected.

    I wouldn’t call that complaining about the entire idea of rigged elections being fake news, but rather challenging Trump to provide evidence for his own claims of specific elections being rigged, which he insulted the journalist and then ended the interview over instead of defending his claims with evidence.


  • Mystery down votes are a common internet phenomenon that, despite knowing it’s widespread, I’ve never quite been able to figure out. Accidental downvotes do happen, especially on mobile in my experience, but at nowhere near a frequent enough rate to explain down votes in the wild. In this case, there’s many possibilities! Are the downvotes from MAGAssholes? Is someone just blanket down voting because they don’t like the instance? Because they don’t like the community? Because they don’t like the user posting it? Because they don’t like the BBC as a source? Because they downvote every US politics thing they come across? Who knows!