They have their own private yachts. They commute to the yachts intermittently via helicopter. The yachts have some level of ECM and anti drone security measures.
They stay out of contested waters, presumably.
They have their own private yachts. They commute to the yachts intermittently via helicopter. The yachts have some level of ECM and anti drone security measures.
They stay out of contested waters, presumably.


Are those use cases a problem for Ukraine though? I assume Ukraine mostly launches from land and doesn’t have the leisure of stockpiling yet.


He knew about that and didn’t say anything. He didn’t want his grindr profile to get publicity but public pressure forced his hand. He actually doesn’t give a shit about his family either.


Plus it seems the air defense they might encounter is fairly minimal.


So it has better range, larger payload capacity, and costs 6x less than a Tomahawk cruise missile.


deleted by creator
Wow, you live in Boaterland? Do you know Jimmy on the east side?


The atomic-scale upside to this, is that immunity is just as worthless as this is, once trump is out of office.


They also have some good unmanned ground vehicles, and interestingly enough, unmanned sea drones


The complexity isn’t a scam, but the legal profession is dead now that you can just @ the president on twitter and he will make sure you don’t get in trouble for being a sex pest


That Venn diagram is more of a circle.


When publicly stating alignment with Israel or Palestine, you have to choose if you want to be hated by the government, or the actual people on the street.
Gun shooty man = warfighter


They’re not getting paid to lead


great yarn there lol


These guys do not want functional schools. I don’t think letting them ruin society is a good plan.
best we can do is Ministry of Love


They have been actively guiding public sentiment away from populist socialism for 50 years, and they will choose to throw every election before they acknowledge that people want socialist policy


I don’t think ‘slamming’ in a headline is too valuable politically, additionally since they have to primary an establishment Democrat to be able to participate in an election I think it’s reasonable that they will be saying negative things about that incumbent Democrat.
If they win the primary, I would expect them to stop campaigning against the Democrat and begin campaigning against the Republican. I am not sure specifically what you want to see - a press release with a negative statement about a Republican?
sorry I am slow, I don’t have access to a computer currently and I’m not too fast at directed search and typing on my phone.
I will agree with you that the DSA is an insurgent movement within the Democratic party though. I am sorry if I misunderstood that. The difference I think I have with you, is that I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad strategy. The tea party successfully performed a hostile takeover of the Republican party, which demonstrates the concept works. In the current political system here, starting a new party isn’t feasible without money and time that we don’t have.
Dear Grid Square,