“Investigations” aren’t the same as “conclusions.” Naming people just means accusing them.

You mean $2000

Literally South Africa’s entire case for “Gaza genocide” before the ICJ is predicated on the statements of the most right-wing Israeli leaders - often in positions that have no authority over the IDF - speak for their army and the intent of their operation to disarm Hamas and retrieve hostages.

But of course when you explore the statements of Palestinian leaders, you get “well they don’t speak for every Palestinian.”

It’s not illegal to develop nuclear weapons. It’s illegal to endanger people with nuclear materials, though

Good thing that it’s not a genocide, according to the UN definition and the ICJ, or some people might really be in trouble

Right up there with “why wont Twitter do something about these obscure Nazi accounts I retweet to my audience of 2 million”

Oh no, I don’t like the tokens generated by the hand-cranked token generator I won’t stop cranking

Isn’t that the point of a tiny home? That you can have a lot of them in a given space?

It’s so absurd; it’s more expensive to convert a container into a home than to just build the home on site

Yes that’s correct, you don’t need the Senate’s permission to sell things

Wait until you hear what a wax is

Unless it’s Ben Gvir?

Is it “rewriting history” when he’s literally in the pictures touring the concentration camps?

They’re mostly made up and you should pay attention to who nobody expects to follow the laws of war (Russia, any Muslims at all)

These are all basically the same thing and, yes, you can’t pass a bill in the Senate if you can’t get 60 votes

It’s like the Oscars and Emmys but for this one island off the coast of France

How else would paper hold a liquid

Wait till you find out about the Grand Mufti of Palestine

How would you enforce a law against war, and who would it apply to?

It was a male grad student (Raymond Gosling) who did the work for Rosalind Franklin; Franklin reported to Maurice Wilkins; Franklin, Wilkins, Watson, and Crick collaborated for a two-paper submission to Nature which publicized the X-ray evidence for, and the theoretical implications of, DNA’s double-helical structure. The surviving members of this collaboration won the Nobel Prize (it is not generally awarded posthumously.)

This has morphed into a claim that “Watson and Crick stole Franklin’s work” because they’re white men and she’s a woman.