You’ve assumed the OP is downvoting because of the wrongness of the argument rather than the lack of validity.

Name one what? One post that commits a logical fallacy? A logical fallacy? You’ve been downloaded for creating a vague argument.

No assumption was made on the accuracy of the argument only on the validity of the argument,therefore no fallacy was committed,. On the other hand you committed the Hasty generalization fallacy by assuming OP’s intent.

It is not about acknowledgement, it’s about understanding the morality of the action. Most of the time, only they know the answer to that question.

In my opinion, in order for an action to be evil, the actor must know what is good or what is right behavior. While sometimes the actor acts with intent to cause harm, sometimes, the actor is ignorant of such things.

It’s a sales tax on everything produced or with raw materials from outside the US

I’m also interested in verifying this. Unfortunately, the article you linked to references young people getting sba loans not social security payments. It then repeats old news about very old people getting social security benefits.

It wasn’t the Democratic voters that were the issue, they were never going to vote for Trump. Worst case scenario, they stay home. It was the independents and left-leaning Republicans that needed to be converted. There are a lot more of them, and they were frustrated by the southern border, the culture was and inflation.

Except that theory has been proven effective and theology is guesswork of desert peasants.

Scientific laws allow for probabilistic predictability.

It depends on your definitions. Religion puts nonexistent intentionality into the system by adding a diety. Science explains the existing system using the language of mathematics.

If that guy is in his 40’s he has lived a hard life. I’m surprised he is still conscious let alone mobile.

My experience with libreoffice is that the word suggestions come from my usage.

My knowledge is sketchy, but I thought North Korea was losing until China stepped up.

53% voting for Jill Stein is the equivalent of throwing your vote away. It’s a passive vote for Trump

There is a difference between doing nothing and making it worse

https://newrepublic.com/post/188222/muslim-vote-harris-trump-stein-2024-election

Not voting for Harris is one vote because it takes one of her votes away. Voting for Trump out of spite is two votes (taking one away from her and giving one to him).

Your comment reinforces the point I am making - people are easily swayed by the inconsequential

No I’m not. I am not interested in academic study. I am interested in real world application. I am aware of justified true belief and that most people don’t apply it. My curiosity is in how people acnually think about the concept.