octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months ago"Free" Speech Absolutist™lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-link"Free" Speech Absolutist™lemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square89fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-24 months agoBut then do you ignore that research when the result is different than you expected? Like this one? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets Or will you not claim exactly the opposite of what the article you provided shows when the topic comes up the next time around?
But then do you ignore that research when the result is different than you expected? Like this one?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets
Or will you not claim exactly the opposite of what the article you provided shows when the topic comes up the next time around?