Using obvious sarcasm as a rhetorical technique is not in bad faith.
Aggressively playing dumb to manufacture an excuse to attack the person doing so as if his argument were sincere, even though you yourself admit you knew he’d “been glib this entire time,” however, is in bad faith.
hey fuckface, if you’re going to apply the rules you better apply the rules for everyone equally, not everyone except your friends like @[email protected] or @[email protected]
I know it was you that deleted my comments because you made this comment after you removed them for being “uncivil”.
how’s this for uncivil, go back to Reddit you corrupt piece of shit.
Yes, that’s exactly what I said. You are definitely communicating in good faith and continuing to respond to you would be a good use of my time.
Oh no, someone gave up on arguing with you in good faith when you’ve been glib this entire time!
Everyone else but you has to play by the rules, eh?
Using obvious sarcasm as a rhetorical technique is not in bad faith.
Aggressively playing dumb to manufacture an excuse to attack the person doing so as if his argument were sincere, even though you yourself admit you knew he’d “been glib this entire time,” however, is in bad faith.
This is your warning.
hey fuckface, if you’re going to apply the rules you better apply the rules for everyone equally, not everyone except your friends like @[email protected] or @[email protected]
I know it was you that deleted my comments because you made this comment after you removed them for being “uncivil”.
how’s this for uncivil, go back to Reddit you corrupt piece of shit.
in case you didn’t realize it this is sarcasm.
Good point, you should nuke this entire thread and/or ban both of us for veering so far off-topic.
Nah, this isn’t some elementary school with a zero-tolerance policy where we punish the victim along with the aggressor.
Ah gotcha, you’re like cops: you ignore rules except when you can stretch them to punish someone you disagree with.