• confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    There are 1050 estimated billionaires in the US. In 2024 we’ve had 38 school shooting related deaths.

    So a bit more than 2 months…

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      He is not talking about school related deaths but about deaths of school children, so everyone who is still a school age.

    • Shadywack@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      29 years, assuming we maintain 2024 school shooting levels. I propose that we just skip the schoolchildren shootings altogether, and just skip straight to French Revolution rates of aristocrat deaths. They unalived over 14,000 aristocrats over just a two year period.

      Given demographics in the US today, those are rookie numbers. I think we could really show history how it ought to be done and bump that up to some really fast math.

      The real unfortunate downside though was that 70% of the casualties during the reign of terror was worker/peasant class. Getting at those rich people meant they had to go through 700,000 human shields that the wealthy put in front of themselves. I figure our current wealthy elite wouldn’t be reached until a far higher number of Americans perished.

      There’s a lot of fucking bootlicker assholes out there still.

        • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Agreed, fuck this Newspeak nonsense. People kill, die, fuck, shit, piss, go off half-cocked making asses of themselves, etc.

          I’m all for censoring pejoratives that are inherently derogatory on the basis of sex, gender, nationality or racial characteristics, but I am deeply critical of shit like ‘unaliving’. I am open to someone correcting this view, but it’s something that started with large corporations afraid of their bottom line. IMO it has no place in the Fediverse.

          steps off of soapbox, curious if the ban hammer cometh

        • Shadywack@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Killed triggers the moderation and censorship tools more quickly. This way some idiot bootlicker has to “get offended” and manually report it, making it take longer for the admins to notice and take it down.

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            If your lemmy instance cares about that sort of language, please join a new one. The only instances I’m aware of that care about harsh language are .ml (censors bitch and some other curses) and .world (regularly deletes stuff celebrating the UHC CEO’s murder).

            Otherwise, this is lemmy, you aren’t on some site that cares about looking friendly and soft for advertisers. Please don’t bring that self censorship shit here.

      • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Modern aristocrats are also much more mobile than their ancien regime counterparts.

        On a completely unrelated note, I wonder how far the FOSSCAD community has come with developing surface to air missiles.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    We’d have have to use drugs or something first to get them to sign over their wealth. Probably film it, make sure no one thinks it was under duress. The whole process could take months to make sure it looks legit. CIA level brainwashing maybe? I donno, just spitballing. Then just make sure they can’t backtrack on everything by finishing the job.

    • letsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Not necessary. After the first round of billionaires has been dispatched, their nepo babies will see the writing on the wall and sign it over quite willingly without any kind of coercion.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        This, make them afraid of having too much at once. It’s what people recieving disability payments are already used to. (You actually get cut off and removed from healthcare providers if you’re disabled and have 2000 in savings, and your spouse’s income counts so you basically can’t get married.

  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I haven’t actually done the math, but by percentages I think they are probably fairly close.

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        In total, you’d only need four numbers:

        • The total number of school aged children
        • The number of school aged children who died due to violent crime
        • The total number of billionaires
        • The total number of billionaires who died due to violent crime
        • Unlearned9545@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Rate could mean over time or percentage of. I think OP was thinking of time, in which case your wouldn’t need the total number of schoolchildren. Just divide the population of billionaires by the number of schoolchildren that die by violent crime per year.

      • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Welp that sucked.

        69 deaths in 2024 (323 school shootings in 1 year. More school shootings than school days. What are you doing there?)*

        And

        400+ billionaires the poorest is 3.3B

        So 2024 had 1 Billionare death, at this rate, we need 399 more years…

        *I forgot to add. Both this source and me are not american. Feel free to correct me with a more local source

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    One small problem:

    Billionaires are not closed in together in a poorly secured room, thus you will need a lot more effort to just shoot down one of them.

    • StThicket@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Just arrange a dick measuring contest, and the largest dicks with the smallest wieners will come together. (pun not intended)

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The 55th World Economic Forum will happen in a few weeks, but the security will probably be, like, almost twice as tight as the average school.

      /s

  • hatrick@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Good point, even though the numbers don’t check out.

    There were 69 children killed this year. 813 billionaires in the US. It would take almost 12 years.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Another fun fact, billionaires and their lifestyles emmit more carbon pollution in 90 minutes than the average person in their lifetimes.

  • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    So what you are saying is we have plenty supply of school children and not enough billionaires? Let’s see how we can get more billionaires then. Or do you want to reduce the number of school children? Because that is being worked on constantly…America, you have the freedom to get killed by someone with mental issues anytime.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Unfortunately billionaires rarely try to educate themselves about the world at all, let alone gather together in a single cramped room to be educated. Still, it’s a nice idea.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    My OCD wonders if they factored in having to assassinate the heirs of the CEOs who immediately become billionaires, recursively until every fortune has been divvied up so many ways nobody has a billion anymore. Cuz that would be necessary if you really want to “run out” of billionaires, and would also mean you advocate executing children for inheriting a lot of money. This does require thinking beyond the simple meme, but go ahead - you can do it!

    • varjen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Unlike royalty the transfer of wealth isn’t instant so if you work fast enough you can achieve a brief window when there are no billionaires.

      • Infinite@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Wealthy people likely have a living trust and the next trustee picks up immediately without needing time-consuming procedures like probate.

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          People might be reluctant to assume possession of billions if people were murdering/ systematically killing billionaires. So, it might be achieved relatively quickly.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Sure you can have the infinite money stone. All you have to do is make it past everyone who will suffer to power it, there’s a lot more of them than you and they are hungry

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Compare the number of size S body bags used every time the cops gather to watch another “mentally troubled loner” to the average number of immediate family over 18 size of each billionaire, kids would have a trust fund guardian you’d rather capture than kill. All in all you’d probably expend a lot less ammo for more benefit going top down. Hypothetically of course.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Any reason to prefer capturing trust fund guardians rather than killing them? I mean, the base plan doesn’t call for checking how the original billionaire got their money or assessing them personally. We’re operating strictly at meme level - controlling enormous wealth is evil. “Kill them! Kill them all!” Anybody who decides to wuss out and start adding constraints could be a shill or an apologist - at any rate it doesn’t show full commitment to Sparkle Motion.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Starting a psyop on 4chan for making edgy school shooter wannabes start aiming at billionaires instead.

    “You see anon, it’s not that girls don’t like you or that your class has 1 non-white person in cornbread America, it’s that billionaires are leeches in society, and the cops they own would stop you. Don’t fire at classmates, fire at the upper class.”

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I tried to teach socialism for terminally 4chan people, it’s hard, and can be immediately undone by /pol/, some other nazi shit, etc.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I did it once, in person, and all it took was food every day for a few months. We all shared our food at lunch instead of keeping it to ourselves, and we all went away more full than we had before. (the reason is that we all got a larger variety of flavors than before, but that’s not the point. The point is communism) Never out had to talk about leftism or politics either, people just sort of came around via eating.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      For good measure point out that people migrating into the country are often because the 1% are offering them otherwise high paying jobs at below minimum wage, but thanks to the exchange rate that’s like a million dollars an hour back in their home country.

      Don’t make it obvious that you’re on the Left or they’ll ignore you on principle. Make it sound like you’re “one of them”

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      These people believe they are just one crypto rug pull away from being part of the 1%

      This argument won’t work on them.