• _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry everyone, it’s like the Sorting Hat, it takes your preference into account. Just say “not TempleOS” and you’ll get into Linux.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well if your definition of “working” is “can run all the important programs and game” then anything thats not windows or linux wont work.

      • stetech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Use TextEdit for .txt and .rtf, and get Sublime Text, VS Codium, or any of the other bazillion IDEs out there until you find one you can tolerate. Helix does that for me. (:

          • stetech@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Which aspects about it do you dislike?

            I’m asking since for most everything – except maybe the fact it’s Electron-based – there’s an extension, or the behavior can already be altered in the settings.

            Also, IDK how your workplace handles application management, but if you have any freedom as a developer (if that is your role?), make sure to get a package manager, presumably Homebrew or MacPorts.
            Brew especially isn’t perfect, but brew install <name> handily beats out any installation method containing the words “App Store” or “Browser download button.”

            You have to apply some (from time to time well-hidden) tweaks to macOS until it becomes usable. :P

      • Nester@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re willing to take the plunge and spend more time in the terminal you could give neovim a try.

        To turn it into an IDE contender you can use LazyVim to automatically setup a bunch of quality of life improvements.

        It’s a bit of a commitment to learn but it is super rewarding when you get it.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s an amazing piece of technology made as a hobby project by the absurdly talented Terry Davis. He gradually lost his world, house and evetually his life to debilitating mental illness, so it makes me sad to see posts like this using “mentally unstable lol” as a punchline.

      • katja@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Temple OS is an impressive feat for a lone dev, no argument there, but it is hardly an amazing piece of tech because of it. It is a barely functioning skeleton OS that looks like it was made in the eighties. There’s only the barest minimum of token apps available and there’s a breaking lack of basic features. The main selling point is of course the bible-related crap but that hardly makes it “amazing tech” or even unique.

        This makes me suspect that what you are actually defending is christianity and you take affront to the use of a christian symbol to exemplify mental illness. Sure, the dev had issues, but how many people knows this? Luckily you are here to point out that it is the dev that was mad, his christian OS is a fine thing actually and has nothing at all to do with madness. Please use Ubuntu Satanic edition to convey madness in future memes.

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree it’s in poor taste to make fun of his mental health issues but calling TempleOS a “hobby project” is burying the lede a little…

  • Redredme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Working computer - >Mac

    Should have been:

    Do you have more money than brains?->Mac

    Or

    Fuck this, I’m doing this for shit and giggles. ->Mac

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          MacOS fails at the main job of OS: managing multiple running applications / windows. I do not understand how they get praise.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            And just like any Linux distro, you can completely customize it. Hammerspoon will completely solve almost every problem you have with macOS.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    • Do you like to throw money at your problems and more money when you’re told: 🍎

    • Do you have a nonconsensual submissive kink with a love for sadistic roughly forced updates destroying what you were working on and ads shoved deep up your home directory: 🪟

    • Do you like free stuff and can RTFM: 🐧

    • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      why RTFM when you can

      1. Be the manual (own distro)
      2. forum (Linux mint fr fr epic gaming free robux baby gronk rizzed up livvy dunne sigma) i use this

      sorry for the brainrot

  • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I absolutely cannot figure out what to do in order to fix an Apple computer when it’s bugging out. Is it a part? The OS? Something external? How am I supposed to diagnose this fucker with so little information? Windows is rapidly heading down the same road. Linux will remain the final bastion of those who fix their electronics themselves

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Indeed I think the “Yes/No” are the wrong way around on the Apple part of the flow.

      Also, why else do you think they call them geniuses. Only geniuses could possibly fix your smooth metal rectangle.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “After smoking a bowl in the break room thorough investigation, we have determined that you need to buy a new one.”

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mac is Linux? You debug it the exact same way, except unlike Linux, you don’t have to worry about 50 different distros, so it’s a lot easier to find solutions. Debugging a hardware issue is just as hard as any other platform… what are you even trying?

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The one thing I’d agree is that it tends to be harder to fix hardware issues. Well, on the new one’s you just don’t because it’s soldered, but a friend’s late 2015 27 inch imac has a borked SSD, and to replace it, we’d need to take off the glued on screen.

        Softwarewise, I prefer the issue-finding experience to the windows one, though.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Harder to fix completely depends on which manufacturer you bought your laptop from, but yeah Macs aren’t easy to fix hardware issues. But finding them is just like other platforms, there’s nothing different there.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Well, yeah, anyone that solders memory and storage will be exponentially harder to fix. I’d be hard pressed to think of any more difficult to fix than the current Apple lineup. Equally difficult? Sure, there’s plenty.

            I wouldn’t be surprised of there’s shome shitbox out there I just haven’t had in front of me yet.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Well, macOS is unix based, and when debbuging a friends mac, I usually find that I find the terminal more comfortable than the Windows Command Prompt.

            Now, that Mac does break in very weird ways sometimes, but I digress.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s a lot simpler to say Linux to keep the conversation going than it is to say Mac is BSD based and therefore is a Unix system and has all the exact same benefits of a Unix based system. There is no joke here, maybe you just like correcting people when they’re trying to have a conversation.

            • Laser@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Calling something Linux is very specific, and it’s just not true for macOS. E g. if someone brings you an encrypted drive that uses LUKS, you can’t mount it in macOS. But both are Unix-like, macOS even being UNIX certified. However, from what I understand, these mostly concern a specific part of the stack that doesn’t guarantee that you can work with the other system, this is rather something for applications to target. I mean cool I can enter a shell and list files on macOS, but that doesn’t fix the problem.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Or do the same basic troubleshooting you would for any other computer. It sounds like the person you’re replying to doesn’t know how to do that. They should learn. It’s not that hard.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      macOS is Unix. Everything can be logged and reported through the terminal if you want more debugging information. There are also power tools you can download that give you better GUI-based control over a myriad of things.

      Though it’s worse now than it was ten years ago. Apple’s software has been suffering under Tim Cook and it’s probably not going to get better until he’s gone.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If only it had a whole slew of logs, like any other OS, that I could easily Google the locations of… Nah, vomiting ignorance on Lemmy is easier.

  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Do you like being spied on and having your data sold?
    => Windows or ChromeOS

    Do you have too much money?
    => Mac

    Do you have a decent set of working brains?
    => Linux

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Microsoft’s telemetry isnt ideal, but they’re not selling your Windows usage data. That is explicitly just used for the OS developers to diagnose issues and evaluate what features are being used.

      Your bing data and shit they are absolutely selling, but it has a different privacy agreement.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Almost no company is selling your data. They’re selling services that they can offer based on the days collected about you. The data itself is too valuable to be sold, as their monopoly on it is the basis for their business model. That’s why all these “we’re not selling your personal data” statements are pointless at best and dishonest at worst.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “if you don’t use linux you are literally unintelligent and there’s no other reason why someone wouldn’t want to spend hours configuring a personal device” — one inevitable comment under every post like this for some reason

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The reason MacOS is seen as a working computer is because if anything breaks about it, it isn’t considered a computer anymore by Apple, it is considered e-waste.

    • This was a problem when they were selling Apple IIs

      MUGs came into being because Apple provided zero support and overcharged for proprietary hardware. So the only recourse was to find a hobbyist, and they were glad to help.

      • panicnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I tried to find a good study of laptop lifespan by brand. The best thing I could find was a consumer reports survey from 2023.

        https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics-computers/laptops-chromebooks/laptopreliability-a7029273631/

        They rated Apple as the #1 laptop for reliability. I don’t think that is “iWaste.”

        This lines up with what I’ve seen, but even as a career IT person my personal sample size ain’t that great.

        I dislike that current Apple products aren’t very repairable, but appreciate that they are very recyclable and durable.

          • panicnow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            If you are saying the “iWaste” comment is about repairability not reliability, I get that. My take is maybe that if something has a long lifespan despite not being repairable, it might be have a longer life before becoming waste or recyclables.

            I do like that the EU is mandating user replaceable batteries and other changes and support most right-to-repair legislation.

            • Shareni@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It can’t have a longer life than something that’s repairable and upgradable.

              Even if we imagine Apple used the highest quality components, which they most certainly didn’t, anything dying means you need to completely replace the internals of your device. It’s like saying a car that needs an engine replacement because of a dead spark plug can have a long life.

              • panicnow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Edit: I’ve lost the thread a little as this started about laptops not mobile phones. I’m leaving this comment here as the points may be valid even for laptops, but I’m too bored to do any more research. Thanks for the great and civil discussion.

                I would agree that a theoretically completely upgradeable and repairable device is better, but I think the real world implementations generally aren’t that good.

                It’s hard to get to statista’s summary of lifespan of phones without a subscription, but many summaries that use their data say something like:

                In general, the average lifespan of a smartphone is 2 to 4 years. According to reports, the iPhone lasts 4-10 years, followed by Samsung units, which can last 3-6 years. Huawei and Xiaomi units have an average lifespan of 2-4 years, while OPPO units have 2-3 years.

                Perhaps there is better data out there that would change my mind, but I haven’t seen it. If Apple products are iWaste, then it appears nearly all other products are even more wasteful. All the data I have seen points to Apple products as generally having a long lifespan followed by an excellent free recycling policy (https://www.apple.com/me/recycling/).

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I guess I don’t get this attitude about macs. I switched to mac when I was traveling a lot in 2007 and saw how portable they could be compared to other laptops. It’s almost 2025 and I just bought my third one last year. My kids are still using my 13 year old MBA for homework, and the hardware is absolutely solid.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You don’t get this attitude about Macs? Are you willfully blind?

        Plug a 1080p monitor into a Windows or Linux machine and notice how text is crisp and readable, because they use sub-pixel text rendering, a technique in use for decades to make text readable and lower resolution monitors.

        Now plug that monitor into a MacOS computer and notice the text looks like trash because Apple ripped out their sub-pixel text rendering system to force users to buy their fancy high res monitors.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Font rendering on Linux is still hit and miss. Recently had to troubleshoot an issue where only the titles of Wikipedia articles in Flatpak Firefox on OpenSUSE looked like ass, with other text, or all text in other browsers and another distro rendering OK.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t actually own a 1080p monitor (nor an apple one), and that’s a pretty specific reason to hate macs of high resolution is your desire. I’m sure there are no similar issues with other platforms that someone could find as a reason to [presumably] turn their PCs into ewaste- which is the actual topic of this thread.

          Hyperbolic much?

          From another thread on this topic:

          Even Microsoft themselves are moving away from it. They just left it on Windows as is for those who use old, standard-res LCD. Their subpixel antialiasing (ClearType) has been disabled by default on Microsoft Office (and many of their productivity products) for years.

          The reason why they are moving away from subpixel antialiasing is because, the sole reason for it exist is for the shortcoming of standard LCD, where it has a big “pixel” that consist of row of RGB “subpixel”. Say if you want to draw a line of 1.5px, obviously you can’t divide that pixel in half. What people did was by using some of the “subpixel” to made up that 0.5px (e.g. it’ll only light up the blue subpixel if the 0.5px is to the left, or conversely the red subpixel if it’s tho the right). Here is an example. By using subpixel rendering on standard LCD, you can “fool” the user by adding that extra colour on the side, which when viewed on standard LCD, it will look smooth rather than those jagged colour.

          Now, obviously this “illusion” will only work on display with big pixel consist of (in order) red, green, and blue subpixel. Now, since many people are moving away toward high resolution display (Apple’s main reason) and there are many other display type with different subpixel arrangements (Microsoft’s main reason, and also Apple’s with their OLED products), there is no reason to use subpixel rendering anymore (in fact, using it on any display other than LCD will look worse).

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I don’t actually own a 1080p monitor (nor an apple one), and that’s a pretty specific reason to hate macs of high resolution is your desire.

            No it is one example amongst hundreds of Apple not prioritizing backwards compatibility or even just third party compatibility, because it would be a little extra effort for a couple software engineers, and as a result we get piles and piles of physical e-waste.

            As a company Apple takes no responsibility for their role in compatibility and ensuring that our (society’s) broad ecosystem of products keeps functioning, they only put effort into making sure that their products, that they profit off of, work and keep working.

            • credo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              A little extra effort times “hundreds” of examples is a lot of extra effort…

              Okay then. Thanks for your viewpoint.

              • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I could never imagine playing defense for a trillion dollar company. “It works for me so I like it.” is a perfectly valid response, but you’re trying to somehow defend their horrible practice of a walled garden, a practice that creates huge amounts of e-waste.

                • credo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  No one defended walled gardens. The conservation was about deprecating lesser used functions. Stop trying to use terms you don’t seem to understand.

              • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                So in your opinion, a trillion dollar company that made billions and billions in pure profit after all their salaries and costs, over the course of decades, can decide that they have no responsibility to reduce e-waste and everyone else in society should throw their stuff out and pay them more money?

                And that’s ok to you? On a moral and ethical level?

                How the honest fuck are you defending an excessively profitable company not supporting (and in several cases, explicitly going out of their way to break) third party accessories and forcing consumers to pay more money and generate more e-waste?

                Or is your opinion is that you bought into the Apple ecosystem, so they can do no wrong?

                • credo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  WTF are you smoking? I just pointed out my last laptop from them is 13 years old and still going strong. Show me another brand that lasts like that.

                  Let me be clear: FUCK OFF

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Did you have anything break on them? Because that was my point.

        Repairing Macs costs a fortune, because Apple rather you buy something new than repair them.

        I still have a Windows 98 machine that fully functions. It is just slow.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, you take it back in and they fix it. Or you fix it yourself. Just like any other computer. If your issue is something hardware related, Apple will still fix it, it just costs a lot because you’re paying for it in every part of the engineering. You can also go to third party repair shops and have them fix it for cheaper.

          I gave a friend a powermac g5 that I had gotten for free as a teen, gave it to them 10 years ago, and it still works too, it’s just slow. That means nothing.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They put out the best commodity hw on the market IMO. The rest is subjective, and everyone is entitled to their preferences.

          Also no mention that macos actually flows from the last Berkeley release of BSD and still has significant interoperability/portability with other variants. Oh well.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Man, this guy’s wiki background ends on a banger.

      " In mid-2013, his website announced: “God’s temple is finished. Now, God kills CIA until it spreads [sic].”[6]

      Davis died after being hit by a train on August 11, 2018.[7]"