• Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The problem is that this argument can really be made both ways. If someone said Israel shouldn’t exist because Palestinians used to live there before that, that’s just essentially the same argument.

    • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Neither argument hold any merit and is an example of the tyranny of history. Who cares what a bunch of dead assholes thought was theirs? The people who live there (not the politicians who pretend to represent their interests) are the only people that have any legitimate claim to authority on what should be done about the region.

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        It is especially meritless to equate people who claim the land based on other people sharing their religion having lived there a thousand years ago, with people whose grandparents got kicked out of their houses and who’ve had to live in an open air prison ever since while being subjected to regular attempts at ethnic cleansing.

    • uzay@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Israel shouldn’t exist because it’s a colonial apartheid state perpetrating a genocide. That doesn’t mean every non-palestinian has to leave either.