• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Not the point? The point is that it was common enough for men in literature to creep on children that the obvious criticism was missed.

    • Architeuthis@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Nabokov’s Lolita really shouldn’t be pigeonholed as merely that, but I guess the movies are another story.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        It certainly shouldn’t, but i was talking about the men who misinterpret the book a bit into some sort of love story, and not a creepy unreliable narrator who is trying to convince you he is really the victim here.

        E: And don’t get me wrong, I don’t think ‘young person discovers their sexuality and comes to grips with it’ is something that should be banned from books or something, it is just annoying to me that so many books have the ~14 year old girls, written by a man, girl gets heavily sexualized by older men (or worse goes for much older man, bonus points if the guy is actually a writer (this is uncommon of course as that is quite specific)), pattern. It feels a bit like creepy wish fulfillment. At my book club we had a period where we noticed that every book we read for a while had the sexualized ~14 year old problem.