Yeah, both sides amiright?

    • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      That excuse wouldn’t fly in a courtroom if someone helped a murderer (repeatedly and knowingly), even if they claim they gave them the weapon for self-defense. It’s proven the US govt knows what the weapons are used for, and they’ve been sending them continuously for over a year. It’s called being an accessory to the crime.

      Btw the genocide convention explicitly lists under article III e “complicity in genocide.”

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        If I loan my kid a gun because he doesn’t feel safe in his house, and he later uses that gun to commit a crime, the only way I get in trouble is if he legally were not allowed to own the gun in the first place.

        To date, Israel has not been sanctioned in that manner. It’s perfectly legal to supply them.

        • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re ignoring the fact that the US knows the weapons are used for war crimes, have been used for war crimes before, and that they’re supplying ever more weapons despite this. If you give your kid a gun and you know he’s going to murder someone, and he’s done it before multiple times, you’re going to jail.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            A better analogy would be handing magazines to a mass shooter whenever he ran out of ammo