Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoWhat's a woman?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageWhat's a woman?lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square155fedilink
minus-squareWalk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoAssuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoAssuming I’m a bicycle, I’d have wheels. Protections presuppose bad faith.
minus-squareWalk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoWhat protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoGendered bathrooms? It certainly does not require a lot of good faith to come up with this example.
minus-squareWalk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoThat’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.
minus-squaregimsy@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoAssuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption
Assuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
Assuming I’m a bicycle, I’d have wheels.
Protections presuppose bad faith.
What protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
Gendered bathrooms? It certainly does not require a lot of good faith to come up with this example.
That’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.
Assuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption