• ghterve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      So as they are being killed, they can think “well, zarkanian didn’t vote for the choice that might have improved my chances of not being killed, but at least it was a principled wrong choice”

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Stein had huge support among Palestinian-Americans. She was the one that they were asking people to vote for. She was endorsed by several Arab-American organizations. This is because she was the only anti-genocide candidate on enough ballots to win.

        Why would they want me to vote for the administration that is not only funding their genocide, but has promised to never stop funding it?

        • ghterve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          They may have preferred the outcome where she won but that was never going to happen no matter how you voted. The possibility that your vote was the difference between Trump and Harris, on the other hand, was within the realm of possibility.

          We need ranked choice voting. But at the moment we don’t have it.

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            The possibility that your vote was the difference between Trump and Harris, on the other hand, was within the realm of possibility.

            Not even remotely. I don’t live in a swing state.