• JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    America’s far left is just normal shit.

    “Hey how about everybody gets food and can see the doctor”

    “How about suck my dick and be my slave”

    “Whoa whoa you two, let’s be civil. Especially you, first guy 😠”

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      America’s left is normal shit, but the far-left is much the same as it is everywhere else, Marxists and Anarchists.

      • Mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        America’s democratic party is much further right than any left leaning European party. Yet, even in the countries where those are or have been in power, the scary communist vision American propaganda promoted never materialized. People’s lives got just a little better as a whole in most cases. American capitalism is a cancer just as much as communism is an unattainable utopia. The answer, as in most cases, lies in the middle, but that’s something the American electorate really struggles to grasp.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          First of all, I absolutely agree that the Democrats are a right-wing party, and the center-right European Social Democracies generally have higher living standards for most people than in America. However, I believe you have overlooked what I believe are critical factors, and you can correct me if I’m wrong here:

          1. The Social Safety Nets in these Social Democracies are shrinking in most cases

          2. Most of the Value consumed in these Social Democracies, the grear, vast majority, comes from countries in the Global South paid far less than the Value created for the Global North, meaning they depend on Imperialism

          3. Disparity continues to rise as Capitalism continues to centralize into fewer and fewer larger and larger Monopolist syndicates, the trend is still towards instability

          The reason they haven’t “turned to Communism” is because they have never wanted to, they have been fundamentaly structured around Capitalism as the dominant Mode of Production and rely on Imperialism to subsidize their cost of living.

          The reason America is different is because it is the global Hegemonic power. The “World Police.” Why is it that the US outspends the rest of the world on the military? So it can project soft power all around the world, securing unequal trade deals with the wealthy Capitalist classes in the Global South. The world trades in US dollars, which the US fights to maintain because it profits from that. This internally causes hyper-disparity between the wealthy and the poor in America.

          Finally, I want to ask why you say Communism is an “unattainable utopia.” Marxists have thus far been proven correct in their thesis that markets trend towards centralization through competition over time, and that as firms get larger they begin to develop infrastructure for their own internalized planning. The concept of a fully publicly owned, centrally planned economy is built up by Capitalism itself. That’s without speaking to the fact that there are already Socialist states working towards said goal of full public ownership and central planning.

          Why do you say the answer is a “middle ground?” What does this look like?

          • Mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Honestly… I’m not sure at this point. I was somewhat nihilistic before, but these past few years have brought that sentiment to a whole new level for me…

            The main limiting factor towards a true communist utopia is one: we’re human. As such, we are unfortunately individualistic by nature, and it’s been proven time and time again that the accumulation of wealth and power only strengthens that sentiment in the vast majority of the population. Under these constraints, I don’t see a path to fully public, decentralized governance and economic equality, someone will always attempt to centralize both.

            What can be done is increase regulations, break up monopolies, put on safety guards and ensure better redistribution, and use, of wealth by increasing taxes to the ruling class. So basically yeah, some form of democraric socialism.

            But then again, since decisions are made by the ruling class, that is unlikely to happen, it’s not in their best interest.

            And as we’ve seen this time around, you just can’t beat stupidity. All the good intentions and overwhelming proof in the world won’t do you any good if people are unwilling to listen. Oftentimes, even the highly educated are unwilling to listen, what chance do you have with the average person?

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ll address what you said in a moment, but I really do think you should read theory. If nihilism is overtaking you, in my opinion that means you have likely not properly analyzed our conditions, nor how to fix them. I keep an “introduction to Marxist theory” reading list I can link if you want.

              First, no Communist is “Utopian.” Utopianism refers to the strategy of trying to figure out the right formula and directly create it, rather than analyzing existing structures and where they are headed. Communists analyze Capitalism and advocate for Socialism because Capitalism creates the conditions for Socicalism naturally, over time, by forming monopolies that can be folded into the public sector and centrally planned.

              Secondly, you are making a critical misunderstanding of Communism. Communism is fully publicly owned and centrally planned. This is the entire purpose of public ownership, once you have public ownership you can plan things centrally, along democratic lines.

              Thirdly, human values and thinking is guided by their social relations and material conditions. In Capitalism, a highly individualistic system filled with competition, these values are expressed at greater levels among Capital Owners. However, as it centralizes, the working class becomes more associated, and communal values are expressed at greater levels. This process has been reflected throughout all of history, from the tight-knit family structure of Feudalism to the modern era, the Mode of Production has formed the Base of society, and influenced the laws, culture, art, and so forth forming the Superstructure that reinforces the base, in a cycle that continues to evolve over time as one Mode of Production slowly leads to the next.

              As per your “Democratic Socialism,” you are describing “Social Democracy.” There is nothing Socialist about what you described, a Capitalist state with large safety nets is Capitalist regardless. As such, you retain the inherent unsustainability of Capitalism and the further rising disparity it contains, until it is eventually overthrown and Socialism is achieved.

              Regarding people’s receptions to ideas, this gets back to the Base and Superstructure argument. As the Base shifts over time, people become accepting of new ideas and values. Focusing on literacy and organizing are the best ways to increase social awareness of systemic issues, and figuring out how to solve them.

              I maintain that you should read theory. I can offer a reading list, or answer any questions you might have. I don’t think it’s fair for you to denounce Communism as impossible if you haven’t engaged with the literature enough to fully understand what it even is, or how Communists want to achieve it and why they believe it not only to be possible, but necessary.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The awful thing is they don’t even see what’s wrong with what you just described.

      Extreme left and extreme right are both pieces of shit in my opinion. I’m not a centrist, but I’m not an extremist either. I just want people to not be put in concentration camps because of who they love or what they said online.

      I guess it’s just too much to ask for from some people. Well, at least 20 million of them.

    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, you ignorant fool… they needed more scorned establishment Republican figures to support her. Liz Cheney wasn’t powerful enough, that much is clear now. The absolute genius of having our vehemently pro-choice candidate on stage accepting the endorsement of rabidly anti-abortion figures almost payed off. It’s the voters who were wrong!

    • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Centrism can win in places that aren’t America. Too many Republicans are being fed propaganda all day long by Fox “News”…an organization that has argued in court that no one should take them seriously. But that’s where they get their news. They’re also indoctrinated by their religious upbringing from Evangelicals. There is no such thing as a moderate Republican anymore. They have shown that they will vote every time for the Republican candidate regardless of how flawed they are. Trump is a convicted felon that tried to overthrow the government, has been found in a court to be a rapist, was best friends with Jeffrey Epstein, has had numerous failed businesses and bankruptcies, has denigrated our troops. NONE OF IT MATTERS. Stop trying to appeal to the right and actually get your voting base excited about the policies you want to push.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Keir won because the UK, like the US, has First Pass The Post and the Even More Far Right Party - Reform - divided the votes on the Far Right hence the Tories came second in lots of electoral circles were they usually come first.

      Also I’ve lived all over Europe including the UK and New Labour is plain Right, not Center-Right - they only seem center by comparison with the Tories who migrated to the Far-Right during the Leave Referendum and subsequent Johnson Government.

      Similarly by comparison with most of Europe (not the UK) the US is a country with only a plain Right (maybe even hard) and a Far-Right.

      Curiously, both New Labour and the Democrat Party support the ethno-Fascist regime in Israel, something which I feel neatly underlines my point as from what I see elsewhere in Europe (with the notable exception of Germany) no Leftwing party supports them.

        • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Labour are centre-left within the context of British politics

          Nothing left about them, Keith made pretty damn sure of it. The fact that you (and sadly many others) think they are though, is simply a demonstration of how the Overton gets shifted to the right by the establishment protecting its own interests, since they are who parliament actually serve.

          maybe this is the wrong community for me to say things like that.

          Pro tip: the community you post in doesn’t change reality.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Or maybe the words do have reasonably fixed global meaning and only British Exceptionalism and their very propaganda-heavy environment makes Britons think their political landscape redefines those words.

          Besides, even in Britain you might want to consider the existence of the Corbyn phenomenon (who, if I remember it correctly, got more votes than Starmer did) as well as the Greenparty (whose 1 million vote count went up to 1.4 million in the latest electing) as proof that there is in fact a Left even in England which is not just “What’s in it for me?!” Neoliberals cosplaying as “lefties” by throwing some identity politics slogans and below inflation minimum wage raises once in a while, whilst de facto supporting an ethno-Fascist regime half way around the globe currently working on Holocaust v2.

          I would say their support for the Neue Nazis and their pro-Finance politics (which I saw up close and personal having worked in that Industry before, during and after the 2008 Crash) by themselves are more than enough to place them firmly in the full-on Right field, possibly even Hard Right.

          People whose guiding principle is “The greatest good for the greatest number” don’t do what the New Labour types have done and continue to do, even the “pragmatic”/“moderate”/“center” ones.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s no way to know exactly. Some states don’t disclose the voter registration statistics. North Dakota doesn’t even require party registration to vote.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re not required to vote in alignment with your registration. It simply allows you to vote in the primary for your party.

          I switch my registration to Republican when there’s a Democratic incumbent so I can vote in the primary.

          • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You have to register as x or y to be allowed to vote though?? Like I knew all the other fucked up parts of the whole US system, but this just fundamentally breaks the secret ballot. It doesn’t matter if you don’t have to align your actual vote.

            It’s like y’all saw us (Australia) doing the secret vote thing and thought “how could we fuck up implementing that?”…

          • pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Or not registered with any party and are little “I” independent. Some states have Independent candidates or parties. I wrote a “ySK” about it early this year around primary time and was accused of misinformation by people who don’t understand different states have different party registrations and laws. I wrote the post as someone smart I knew thought they had to register as an Independent party voter to “not be a Republican or Democrat”.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why is this third considered to be representative of the “moderate republican”?

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Look, I just got my coffee, it’s four am, and you are asking me to effectively explain the previous 40 years of American politics to you.

          I want to trust that you are asking in good faith, and that you deserve an explanation here, but I’m burnt out in the equivocation right now. So just give me a small signal that my time isn’t wasted here and I can explain this to you .

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’m sorry. To me it seemed like something the more politically involved voter would do.

            • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t think that’s the response they were after.

              You could have tried something like:

              I can appreciate you’re tired and I think we’re all a little exhausted after this election cycle. I am definitely interested in learning your perspective on this and opening myself up to other viewpoints.

              See I acknowledged OPs comment and tried to explain my motivations for the question. You, on the other hand, you called them out for rightfully wanting to value their time.

              • iii@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That’s alright. Simply trying to understand the relationship between that graph, and the conclusion the author took from that.

                But I see now that this might not be the appropriate crowd to help me understand.

                • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Sure, everyone is downvoting you but you can’t be the constant here and it must be this entire community.

                  Perhaps someone more eloquent than me can come along and explain why your approach fell on deaf ears.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m sure them supporting and paying to kill women and children didn’t help either, and that their online cult acted almost as fascist as the person they claimed they were trying to stop.

    • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nobody is under the illusion that Trump is better for the situation in Gaza than Harris.

      But, too many left-leaning voters feel they have to “take a stand” by staying home or voting third party. I have several friends who did exactly that, even though it’s abundantly clear that staying home is effectively a vote for Trump.

      Meanwhile, NOBODY on the conservative side is doing that shit. It’s been true since the Reagan era, the conservatives put aside any personal distaste they have, and they get behind their candidate.

      • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But, too many left-leaning voters feel they have to “take a stand” by staying home or voting third party. I have several friends who did exactly that, even though it’s abundantly clear that staying home is effectively a vote for Trump.

        That is the big problem here that people just don’t want to admit.

        • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just look at the numbers. Harris will probably finish 15 million votes behind Biden 2020. Those are people who could have voted, but didn’t.

        • SoJB@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Could it be the dogshit right wing Hillary-repeating campaign the Harris folks ran?

          The same campaign leftists have been tearing apart and pointing out the objective failures of, predicting exactly this result?

          No, it must be the nonexistent leftists who are wrong.

          You people are hilarious lmao. You seriously think the average American even knows one shred of leftist theory?

          I guess if you people knew why you lost, you wouldn’t have lost so I can’t blame you too much. The curse of a weak mind must be hard to bear.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Correct its the fault of the person advocating a genocide.

              ‘dont commit a genocide, toss in some prolabor policies.’

              ‘Stop tearing me down!’

              Do you even fucking hear yourself. Lol

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Indeed my speech is high in protein. It does the soul good. You should try not supporting a genocide sometime yourself. Once you can do that all the other little groups im sure you’ve tried to brow beat people with would suddenly also be protected.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Almost like Kamala could have changed her stance on the situation and got those people out to vote for her. But sure, let’s blame people not willing to hold their nose and vote for more genocide.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      and that their online cult acted almost as fascist as the person they claimed they were trying to stop.

      Yeah, like how Harris fans were talking about people poisoning the blood of the country and their plans about deporting millions of people, which would require concentration camps. And then there’s the Democratic party’s genocidal persecution of queer people.

      Basically no difference at all.

      I don’t want to leave this country, but I’m so fucking glad I’ll get away from these sort of stupid lies.

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not in your country, but already have Timewarp tagged as “Trump talking point maniac” for some time. Just so you know the lies are available abroad too.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I know they are, but less so. Or at least hopefully less so about America. I’ll have to deal with all new lies in Britain.

          • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well Keir Starmer was one of the first to congratulate Trump on his victory before it was official, and talk about the “special relationship” between the two countries, so I wouldn’t get your hopes up. Trump also owns a golf club is Scotland, so is sure to visit and the Tories are pushing for him to be allowed to address parliament when he does, which is nice.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              When Keir Starmer starts planning the queer genocide Trump’s people are planning, I’ll give more of a shit. Right now, I am laser-focused on protecting my child. That is my only job right now.

              • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                To drop all the snark: I do worry about the UK, but for sure it would be a better place to be than the US right now.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t matter what country you go as long as it is a two party corporatocracy and the “left” is parading around with war-mongering neocons, supporting genocide, censoring and astroturfing social media for people point it out, etc… then you’ll get the same result.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Oh that’s fine. It’s a three party corporatocracy in England. Plus the corporatocracies in other parts of Britain.

          But they know what fascism is and they know that what Harris’ supporters wanted wasn’t fascism. So I’m happy to be going there.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m a progressive that is against fascism and genocide, but the number of Democrats that censored me and called me a fascist has me convinced that many of them are perfectly content with fascism as long as it is their fascism.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They were talking about their plans to deport more people, build more immigrant holding facilities, and shutting the border down. When republicans started fear mongering about the “immigrant caravan”, democrats hopped right on board.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not even close to the same.

          No one is saying they were good. That’s the mistake so many people make about people who voted for Harris. Plenty of us didn’t do it because we liked Harris. We did it because we hated Trump.

          Over and over again, I said to people telling me not to vote for Harris, “which candidate should I vote for that has a legitimate chance of beating Donald Trump?” And I didn’t get an answer.

          Then, when Indiana finalized it’s ballot, there were four names on it and write-ins were not allowed: Harris, Trump, Kennedy and Oliver. Again, I asked who I should vote for multiple times. No answer. The closest I got was a very confused person who told me I shouldn’t vote for any of them as I did a process of elimination while simultaneously saying I shouldn’t abstain.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Good lord you’re prolific on here. Im pretty sure youve argued with me against progressive parties before and all of this is extreme revisionism. But its too far buried.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not sure how that changes the fact that I asked and asked and I never got an answer for who I should vote for.

              Even now, you’re not saying who I should have voted for.

              That is not how anyone wins elections.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I think you are completely lying. I was on here a lot promoting Stein, and getting extremely opposed by you and everyone else. Fuck off with this “i just wanted an answer” innocent BS

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m not lying at all.

                  I literally could not vote for Stein. Did you not read what I wrote? Do I need to show you the Indiana ballot and prove it to you?

  • J Lou@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the Republicans are going to call the Democrats communists and socialist regardless of how moderate a campaign Democrats run, Democrats might as well lean further left on economic policy. Appealing to the right does nothing because the right can appeal to the right better than the center-left can

    @leftism

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      None of that will work anymore. The far right owns the house, the senate, the government enforcement agencies, and the Supreme Court. We’re nearing the end of the monopoly game and you don’t get anything extra for landing on free parking. The restraints for any of the rich and powerful just got taken off.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which is precisely why they don’t. They don’t exist to threaten the establishment, they are part of it, and are there to provide the illusion of choice so that the public feel like we’re helping while those in power do whatever they need to at our expense to keep that power. Playing by the rules and within the systems they have set out for us can and will only ever maintain the status quo.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This makes sense if one has never been in any sort of leadership role or public-facing organization before.

        It’s true in very narrow senses which are stretched to breaking because really it isn’t true.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This assumes the dems have any interest in actually improving the lives of Americans.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Jangling keys of “maybe if I get the senate I’ll raise minimum wage? Do you want… Legal weed sometime?” sure works well. Just look at that electoral map!

      • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Oh, you mean Social Security? Medicare? Medicaid? Forgiveness from predatory student loan financial slavery? Overtime pay? Reasonably safe work conditions? The option to have a dead fetus removed from a woman before it literally rots in her and kills her? A basic education for every child, regardless of wealth? Healthcare for all Americans without death panel insurance companies who care more about shareholders than the policy owner?

        You mean those things?

        “But… but… muh property taxes and gas prices… damn blacks, queers, and loudmouth women ruin everything!”

        Fuck Putin, by the way.

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just because they implement good policy from time to time doesn’t mean they give a shit about Americans.

          • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You know who really doesn’t give a shit about Americans, or anyone else but their "Tribe?’ Nazis. Well, now you’ve got it. Hope you enjoy it when anyone you know who isn’t white and straight is persecuted.

            We’re done. Buh bye.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yup. Democratic leadership would rather trump win than run a left-facing campaign and candidate. What’s the definition of insanity?

    • JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Democratic Party is basically dead now. Time to sit back and watch the MAGAs eat themselves. Clock ticking.

      • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You won’t live long enough to see the end of MAGA. You will live to see the end of American Democracy.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well that’s one way to look at this positively.

        How do you see this going down? Internal power struggles and tantrum hissy fits?

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Magas will eat a lot of good people first, unfortunately. And the show will be extended over many years. Another enemy or bad group will always be found.

        The “and then they came for” moment won’t hit critical mass for aomg time if ever. It’s terrifying to think how long an authoritarian group could maintain power with the technology and military power available today.

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah no. I hate the democrats, I’m a registered libertarian. The popular vote said they’re fine with project 2025.

      I don’t really care what issues anyone had. It was exesetential. We failed. That’s not a party issue, it’s an American issue. I don’t care about turnout, if you didn’t turn out you don’t care. Thats not on the party that’s on you. I don’t care about policy, it’s all about to get worse, we’ve seen it. Parties cease to matter when there’s dead bodies in the halls of government. We all saw the worst fucking coup attempt in history… And it worked. There is no party to blame for that. 2016 came down to poor leadership, this is just… deserved.

      We’ll see what’s left to re-build with.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is a party issue. The reason Democrats couldn’t effectively run on the issue of democracy is that they THEMSELVES did not treat Trump as a threat to democracy. Actions speak louder than words. Democrats called Trump a fascist and a threat to democracy. But they didn’t even start an investigation of him til two years into the Biden term. That man should have been arrested day one, hauled in front of a military tribunal, charged with treason, and dealt with accordingly. Any SCOTUS justices that tried to prevent this should have been charged as accessories after the fact and similarly tried as enemies of the republic.

        THAT is the rational response to a former president that tried to overthrow the government. Trump should have been six feet under before Biden finished his first 100 days. That is the kind of urgency that is needed when a true existential threat is present. Look what happens when a random citizen tries to walk into the White House carrying a rifle. Do you think they weigh the political calculus of dealing with the person and how to respond to them without angering voters? No, they do what is necessary, then and there. That is what you do in an emergency.

        What kind of existential threat do you just ignore for two years and then slow-walk? If China were invading Hawaii, would we move with that kind of sloth? No, an existential threat requires immediate action. By giving so much deference to Trump, Biden made extremely clear that he didn’t believe Trump to be an existential threat to democracy. Entirely because of his actions, any later campaign pleas about the threat of Trump fell of deaf ears. If the president of the United States won’t take something seriously as a threat to democracy, why would anyone expect voters to?

        • batmaniam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t disagree they did a bad job. Clearly. Again, I don’t even like them in the first place for similar reasons. What I’m saying is there was exactly one way to avoid all of this this week, and we all signed off on it. The democrats didn’t make anyone stay home. The democrats didn’t make anyone vote for Trump. Individuals can’t take the action you described above, but they had an option to stop it from getting worse, and chose not to.

          If you think the party is busted fine, I freaking agree. It’s not picking evil from the lesser of the two, it’s picking who you want to fight.

          Again I’ll say, the dems didn’t do this, we all did. The dysfunction of a party doesn’t excuse individuals had a choice, and chose this.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      100%

      Here in deep-red Missouri the $15 minimum wage passed in a landslide, but for some reason, all Democrats wanted to talk about was tax cuts that no one thinks they’ll actually pass anyway.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Democratic leadership is those of us who do the thankless work of playing politics to help others.

      Find something different. You won’t. Sure Progressive Party Whatever - they’ll run into the exact same thing. You’re re-inventing the wheel because you don’t know that.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s…

        I’m not sure we’re all talking about the same thing. The Democratic Party has been playing to the “center” longer than any of us have been alive, while shunning, excommunicating, and often literally arresting anyone to the left. And all that accomplishes and has ever accomplished is the Overton window shifting further and further right. Kamala was running on bragging about hiring “the good” republicans while sidestepping the massive issues anyone even slightly progressive wanted to talk about (and what almost surely turned off a huge portion of voters), which is the ongoing genocide in Gaza. She finally said the day before the election that she would do “everything in her power to end the war,” which is still not nearly enough when discussing a fuckin genocide.

        So many of the people I know are leftists. None of them voted for her because of it. Sure, the democrats and liberals I know did—my parents, for example. But they have voted democrat the entire time I’ve been alive. They are solid, reliable Dem voters. They’re not the people she needed to appeal to either—but keeping them was certainly more important than any mythical “centrist/swing” voter.

        Everyone that was arrested for sitting in school buildings protesting the genocide, everyone who is sickened by what we’re seeing. Who couldn’t stomach voting for someone who didn’t feel the need to say it was a genocide that sickens them. THOSE are the people the dems gain when, like in 2020, things are so bad they hold their noses and increase turnout, and they’re the votes they lose when they hold office and maintain the genocidal status quo.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Who has been arrested for not being Dem enough? Oh, that’s right. Nobody. And the Republicans have never, will never, and absolutely will never stop Gaza genocide.

          Fuck Putin.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, there’s a whole lot that went wrong, but the big one was subverting the democratic process with primaries that didn’t really pick a popular candidate (2016 and 2024).

    The primaries are the time for the candidate to energize a base of support. Harris has never energized anybody, and it was silly to think that affection for Biden would carry her.

    Conservatives vote in force to signal their loyalty to their chosen community.

    Progressives stay home when they perceive that their community doesn’t chose them. Harris’ vote totals at the end of this will sit somewhere below Biden 2020, for that reason.

    • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wouldn’t leave 2020 out. Having politicians ahead of Joe Biden pull out to endorse him ahead of super Tuesday was really irregular and didn’t result in a good candidate either

  • lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know how normal it is to be registered in the US but I would assume the target were moderate voters, not party members

    • klemptor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In many states you have to be registered if you want to vote in the primary. I would imagine most active voters are registered.

  • Juigi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    After everything that’s happened with trump, you guys elect him the 2nd time.

    You guys suck.

  • shastaxc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem with that strategy is that moderate Republicans don’t watch the news. They believe that all other Republicans are just like them and hold all the same beliefs, because all their friends are in the same echo chamber. So then they believe all Republican politicians are the same way. They intentionally don’t pay attention to the news because it is full of sensationalism and depressing things they can’t personally control like terrorism and mass shootings. They still believe it’s important to vote, because that’s the patriotic thing to do, and they can just fill the bubbles next to every name marked REP and not have to worry about doing research and learning facts. It’s just the easy way and they’ve lived their whole lives doing things the easy way because of white privilege and generational wealth, but any low points in their lives they will consider to be “hardship” so they “know” that anyone living in poverty is just not trying hard enough, because they personally made it through that “struggle” with barely more than the average effort they usually contribute to anything.

    How do I know this? I was raised in a family that is exactly how I described here. The only reason I’m not just like them is that I went to public school and made friends with kids who did not come from the same background. It took about 17 years to finally see all the flawed logic and head-in-sandness before finally breaking free and forging my own path based on my own beliefs.