• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That makes an assumption that all or a big majority third party voters would prefer Harris over Trump.

    Just for clarifying the logic here.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      These numbers are also lies. Trump won PA by 68,735, while Stein got 48,912. It’s just misinformation.

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nobody who would have otherwise voted for Trump is going to be convinced to vote for Stein. Every vote she gets IS one that was much more aligned with Harris.

      This isn’t a question of ALL third parties, but there aren’t any right-aligned third parties making any kind of a meaningful run.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What??

        In Michigan Gary Johnson got 172,136 votes, in Pennsylvania he got 146,715, and in Wisconsin he got 106,674. If all Greens voted Clinton and all Libertarians voted Trump then New Mexico would’ve only been won by Clinton with around 1,000 votes, Colorado would’ve also been nearly Trump. Nevada, New Hampshire, and Minnesota would’ve been won by Trump. Maine might’ve gone majority Trump.

        Third parties hurt Trump more than they help him, because Libertarians would not have voted Clinton.

        • Red_October@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          And how many of them are running now? This isn’t about them, this is about the one third party candidate that actually makes headlines.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The Green party gets more attention in left-leaning circles because there are people sympathetic to it and there are people who want to blame them for the Democrats losing. It’s not because they’re actually more popular than the Libertarian party, which regularly gets like 3 times as many votes.

            2020: 1,865,917 (LP); 405,034 (GP)
            2016: 4,489,359; 1,457,216
            2012: 1,275,923; 469,627
            2008: 523,713; 161,797 
            2004: 397,265; 119,859
            

            So it’s completely wrong to say that “there aren’t any right-wing third parties making any kind of a meaningful run.” It’s just that your perception of how popular the Libertarian party is compared to the Greens is distorted.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              At the same time, the way that the EC favors the GOP causes the spoiler effect of the Green Party to be amplified compared to Libertarians.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                How? By the same math as OP, the Libertarian Party splitting the vote cost Trump Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin in 2020. That’s 37 EC votes which would’ve been enough to make the election an exact tie.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes. If Greens tend to the Left, the last thing they should want is right extremists