• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What would you qualify? My mind goes to fusion, and the moon landings. And this is quite a bit more complicated than Apollo. (Though we have better tools nowadays)

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Starship is aiming to have the same payload capacity while being fully reusable. Seems like adding that constraint makes it harder.

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Would you call the pyramids the most difficult engineering problems in human history? They had a whole lot worse tools. I wasn’t taking into account how much easier the tools make it, just the complexity of the challenge.

                • Optional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I mean. They were pretty challenging, I would expect.

                  It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

                  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

                    What do you mean? Starship does too.