• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Starship is aiming to have the same payload capacity while being fully reusable. Seems like adding that constraint makes it harder.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Would you call the pyramids the most difficult engineering problems in human history? They had a whole lot worse tools. I wasn’t taking into account how much easier the tools make it, just the complexity of the challenge.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I mean. They were pretty challenging, I would expect.

                It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

                • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

                  What do you mean? Starship does too.

                  • Optional@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It was about “Those are literally the engineers who worked on this, one of the most difficult engineering problems in human history, having nailed it on their first try.”

                    And how the tools, materials, processes, and organizational structures to deal with those complexities do in fact make it easier than say the original Apollo missions.