• lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The entire “article” is based on one tweet from one guy. Guess that guy is “MAGAs”.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is what’s called a whataboutism and it is garbage rhetoric. I’m not saying it isn’t hilarious watching these idiots eat themselves alive. But giving something you agree with a pass because ‘well the other guy did it first’ is dumb.

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not a commentary on shit. It’s attempted righteous grandstanding that falls apart pretty quick and so is this comment.

            • Voyajer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Considering the point of whataboutism is to deflect, their example of “slam” articles wouldn’t make sense as it is often used by what you would consider that person’s side wouldn’t make sense. I’d even say your comment fits the good old fallacy fallacy.