• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s both - yes, places are getting hit with types and scales of natural disasters they could not have anticipated, but they’re also rebuilding in places that will get hit hardest when they do it again

    Consider the idea of a 100 year standard - you’re building to the level where it won’t hold up to the storm of a lifetime. Let alone the fact that storms keep getting worse… It boggles my mind

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Poor people live where they can afford to, however they can. In trailer parks, in a tent, in a log cabin, however they can. Even knowing that someplace is likely to flood again, someone will choose to live there. For someone who has a minimum wage job, no savings, and with most houses costing a significant fraction of a million dollars, they don’t have the choice to live in a floating sky castle or 20,000 leagues under the sea or on a moon colony, so they’ll choose to live even somewhere where life is difficult.

      Agreed though that people should not pay the full asking price for such a place, as if it would not flood, that is… probably happening, but not wise at all.