• LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Considering ~95% of the native population died of disease within 50 years of the settlers landing? Yeah you can say it was pretty empty. I’m always fascinated by the willful ignorance of “settlers” in the context of the old west. Journals talk of “miraculous” groves of fruiting bushes and trees or other edible vegetation and how it’s clearly a gift from their white god while studiously avoiding any mention of the signs of previous habitation in the area. We’re still discovering massive irrigation networks in AZ and NM with satellite LiDAR that no “settler” ever mentioned.

    Don’t overlook the first genocide of my people by focusing too hard on the second. The Europeans struggled to quell the survivors. I honestly don’t think settlers had much of a chance otherwise, even with the difference in technology.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except there’s about ~200 years between plagues being introduced to the America’s and the big westward settling pushes. Again, don’t conflate one genocide with another.