• Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The product is you not going broke in case you break your arm.

    Doesn’t mean that the american healthcare system is good, it’s a disaster. But claiming insurance is a bad thing is moronic aswell. These are the people that want “free healthcare” like most oft europe, not realizing that the “free” part is because wie habe (somewhat) mandatory health insurance.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s supposed to be that insurance converts inherent risk into a predictable cost, but health insurance is not really doing that. The costs remain unpredictable.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      But they know that, which is why healthcare costs have consistently increased higher than inflation.

      Healthcare is one of THE MOST demand inelastic commodities or services. People do not say “oooh that’s a lot of money - is there a worse doctor who is cheaper?”, instead they say “100% yes I will remortgage my home and sell assets to pay for the cancer treatment my child needs.” Nobody is at the free clinic by choice, they’re there because they cannot afford or borrow to pay for better care.

      Capitalism is incompatible with ‘rational consumer purchasing choices’ that apply to clothes, food, TVs, etc. because when there’s death or life altering negative outcomes, the only rational decision is to pay WHATEVER the price demanded is. Healthcare has a demand wall, not a demand curve.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        For mathematics wall is a curve. But yeah, completely agree.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        People do not say “oooh that’s a lot of money - is there a worse doctor who is cheaper?”, instead they say “100% yes I will remortgage my home and sell assets to pay for the cancer treatment my child needs.”

        I can’t believe how many times I had to make this exact point to dipshits I worked with any time they uttered the term “free market”.

        What am I going to do in an emergency in the back of an ambulance on the way to the ER? Hey, can you guys pull over for a sec? I need to check if the current ER doc is in network. Fuuuck ooooffff.

        I then recount the time I needed a non-emergency procedure (MRI for my back) which affords me plenty of time to shop around. I proceeded to call around to try to get prices (LOL) and then I got my insurance and MRI place on the phone all at once and I STILL couldn’t get a solid number for how much it would cost me. Who the fuck else needs to be on the call to get a number???

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          No, in theory, they work like a well-funded savings account: you put in a predictable amount of money every month, and they store it for you until you need to withdraw it; with an added benefit that they would allow you to withdraw more than you have (internally using other people’s money to cover the difference) under the assumption that any shortfalls that result will all come out in the wash eventually; some people overpay, some people underpay, and you invest what you have in low-risk investments in the meantime. All insurance companies work like that in theory, or at least that’s what they tell regulators. But in reality, they don’t pay out nearly enough to provide the consistency people need.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The costs remain unpredictable.

      I wholly disagree. I predict that the costs will be unnecessarily high.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, they make a profit if your premiums are more than your care+overhead. Preventative care is sometimes offered with no co-pay — presumably because you end up costing them less over the long haul if you keep up to date with your Dr. appointments.

      It’s not a great system; but it does work very well for some customers, and failing to recognize that tends to preclude having a productive discussion.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        the united states is #1 in medical bankruptcy, including people with insurance.

        insurance is a scam youve been taught to not see as a scam. its a terrible middleman which extracts profits from sick and hurt humans by denying them care. if they paid all the claims, they would have no profit. and why should they? how can anyone defend such a gross money grab.

        giving the scam credibility keeps those costs high . pretending it has value keeps us from moving to a cheaper, more universal system.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, they also profit from healthy people who don’t use their insurance much.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          They literally do?

          Customers that pay their premiums for years without actually needing healthcare is literally free money for them.

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            im not sure why you think the money coming in from premiums isnt the same money used to pay claims, but you go ahead and believe whatever you want.

            the fact is we have to pass laws forcing them to spend a percentage of their profits on claims. their income is premiums their output is either claims, profit or operating costs.

            their profit comes solely from them denying claims. if they paid all claims they would have no profit.

            • skibidi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The argument the person above you is making is that they also profit off people who never file claims in the first place. In fact those people are more profitable since they do not consume labor to process claims.

              The Byzantine system of rules and coverage exemptions exists to disincentive people from filing claims just as it exists to give leeway to deny them.

              Of course the overall point that paid claims must be less than premiums charged (and investment income) is correct.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              im not sure why you think the money coming in from premiums isnt the same money used to pay claims

              And I’m not sure why you’d assume I think that.

              You’re saying they make their money from denying claims, rather than from premiums paid by the healthy, which they then keep by denying claims from the sick (who also pay them premiums), is a distinction without a difference.

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Disclaimer: I think the current U.S healthcare system is hilariously bad and should be heavily reformed.

    Insurance is not a bad thing, and there is a clear product involved in it. To demonstrate, you can go to a doctor in the U.S and pay in cash for the treatment. As I’ve understood it, you can even negotiate lower prices than the list prices if you are paying in cash. Still, it’s probably going to be expensive to the point of potential financial ruin.

    This is the product that insurance offers in any domain it operates - buying your way out of risks you cannot accept. Fundamentally, the concept is sound, albeit very poorly implemented in the case of U.S healthcare.

    It’s basically just a bunch of people pooling their money together and having that pool of money pay in the case of an adverse event.

    One of the primary alternatives to the mess that is U.S healthcare today is in fact another form of insurance - it’s just that enrollment would be mandatory and as such the risk spreading would be as uniform as possible, along with subsidies for people carrying higher amounts of risk. That’s fundamentally what universal healthcare is in other countries.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Health insurance companies sure seem like socialized healthcare but with some rich guys that steal money out of the pot

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    They literally don’t even have a product.

    Then don’t buy it.

    (I’m tired of the oversimplification that gets voted to the top of any social media)

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The in-network healthcare providers don’t trust my employer’s insurer. So much so, they require full payment up front. At this point, I don’t know what in-network even means. I no longer buy it.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yikes. I’m guessing that provider has had issues being paid by this insurer in the past?

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah no kidding. A company gets to profit off keeping us from getting treatment and it’s just accepted and normal.

  • Illogicalbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    My favorite is when they send me and letter in the US mail for the sole purpose of telling me they decided to cover our medication the doctor prescribed. The language they use is infuriating.

    As if we should call them back and praise them, be grateful for their service, and just ignore that I’m paying them.

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This! Health insurance is the reason why medical costs in the US are so ridiculous. Health insurance, and IMO all insurance, is a scam. And since the “customers” (people who NEED care) can’t see the price of service beforehand, there is no way for them to choose the most cost efficient option, which allows providers to charge whatever they want. Then the insurance company can come up with reasons not to pay and put the client on the line for the cost.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I disagree with the idea that all insurance is a scam. Insurance is a risk mitigation tool. I’m fine with paying a little bit of money every month so that my family is financially secure if I die unexpectedly or I can replace my home if it burns down. All in all, insurance can be a fairly good and cost effective risk mitigation tool.

      The problem is that an insurance business model is incompatible with healthcare. It’s not likely that I’m going to die within the next year. It’s very likely that I’m going to need medical care within the next year. As we [Americans] have increasingly leaned on health insurance to pay for routine medical care, health insurance companies have done a great job of muddying the water and making it more and more difficult to understand how the process works, much less get good quality medical care. There’s a clear conflict of interest between making money and paying for medical care.

      Insurance itself isn’t bad. But health insurance is bad. The fact that health issurance is often tied to employment is also bad. Ironically, it has a negative impact on the economy. Maybe even a significant impact although that’s hard to say for sure.

      If politicians really cared about small businesses, they would pass a universal healthcare bill ASAP. I would bet my left arm we would see a huge increase in small businesses if the potential small business owners didn’t have to worry about getting healthcare from their current employers.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s gambling, so the house always wins, except it’s worse with insurance because you could only win by losing.

      Health insurance would make sense if it was cheap. My parents used to have “major medical” plan, indemnity vs very high bills, not healthcare just literal insurance. But it was cheap.

      Now I have the High Deductible with HSA plan, same thing except it comes with some free preventative care. But it’s expensive! What the fuck!

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Apparently, yeah.

      You probably haven’t even shot up a school or anything have you.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah in the United States of Billionaires healthcare is a product to extract profit from in every way possible.

      Pharma companies get public funding for research and then turn around and charge insane prices for the final product infuriatingly referring to research costs to justify their pricing.

      Hospitals are bought and run by investment companies.

      “Insurance” scammers corporations have their own fiefdoms that they control so there’s very little competition and their sole reason for existing is to take your money and deny coverage for absolutely anything they can possibly deny you for so they keep the most money possible.

      We have The Best System In The World™ (for the ultra wealthy)

  • orangeboats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you squint your eyes just enough, insurance is like gambling… You are betting that something is going to happen to you, the insurance company is betting against that. The insurance company can improve their chances by adding conditions to that something.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s way worse than gambling. When you win a jackpot there are laws that require you to get paid out.

      Insurance companies can just say no and fight you in court until you die because it’s cheaper for them to pay some lawyers than for your treatment.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s the part that makes the US system insane.

      In countries with a public health care system, the goal of the patients and the doctors is the same. Everybody’s goal is to prevent diseases and sickness, and to treat it when it isn’t prevented. The administrators just estimate how much funding is needed to achieve that goal.

      In the US system, the patients are trying to prevent and treat their sicknesses and diseases. The administrators are trying to find ways to avoid paying for any treatments, and the doctors make more money if they can find a way to bill more things.

      And, what’s especially insane is that healthcare really isn’t a normal market like other things. If you’re buying a truck, you can shop around, haggle with salespeople, etc. If you’re hit by a truck, you’re not going to be comparison-shopping emergency rooms.

  • Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Same as student loan “servicers” collecting billions in interest to just keep track of peoples’ debts.