• davitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    He’s free to discuss this article any way that he thinks is interesting. Just because he found it helpful to point out the bias in this case doesn’t obligate him to do it in any other cases. He doesn’t owe you anything.

    Also, responding to someone noting the reputation of your source with what amounts to "ARE YOU ACCUSING ME OF BREAKING THE RULES? ARE YOU SAYING CONSERVATIVE LEANING SOURCES ARE ILLEGAL?” is basically the textbook definition of a wildly defensive response lmao.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He’s free to discuss this article any way that he thinks is interesting. Just because he found it helpful to point out the bias in this case

      Agreed. He’s totally free to do that.

      And I’m free to let him know that I didn’t think it really added to the conversation. Which I did.

      So you would you be totally cool with me going down every single pro-harris article and giving a brief history of how that news org leans democrat?

      How long do you think I could do that before being accused of being a troll?

      Should we list the bias of every news org for every article? Or just the ones you all don’t like? Cuz I’m cool with doing that if you are.