• forrcaho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For people asking what this is about, I didn’t look at the NYT because of the paywall, but here’s an article that’s very similar in tone from NPR.

    Although they do state

    The dozen Harris statements lacking in context are far less in comparison to 162 misstatements, exaggerations and outright lies that NPR found from Trump’s hour-long news conference Aug. 8.

    the following items are really nit-picky. It’s laid out as a list of misleading statements, but reading the details of each makes me think “ok, so basically true, then”.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like some loud conservatives made NPR freak out and now they’re trying to sprinkle in stories like this.

      Because the moment conservatives run things again, they’ll absolutely continue gutting public radio.

    • Narwhalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some of the “misleading” statements were Harris neglecting to enumerate the reasons why a stated policy goal might not succeed, which would be incredibly unusual to include in a speech of this nature.

      I guess the point the author was trying to make was that saying you “will” do something in office is a promise, and if you don’t have the ability to guarantee that promise can be kept you shouldn’t say that thing at all? I love me some NPR but they’re really bending over backwards with some of these…