• Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I swear there were like 3 guys in the 60s or something that loved brutalism so much that they spent the next few years going to major cities to convince mayors to build the ugliest, most ghastly buildings that would remain as eyesores for decades to come.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Where I live there was a period in the 80s where people got obsessed with ‘roughcast’ and decided to start covering their houses with sharp rocks. I’d be scared of falling against them while drunk and tearing my face open.

            • someguy3@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Like how close do you have to get before you can even see that it’s rough? Brutalism can be seen the second you see the building.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Brutalism is also about showing the materials used for the structure rather than using facades. (But I don’t think anyone is saying rough rock coverings are brutalist lol)

              • snooggums@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Depending on the coloration of the material in of the texture and how rough it is, several feet to hundreds of yards/meters away.

                But the reason brutalism is easier to see far away is more about the solid rectangular shapes and style than the texture of the material. If you made a concrete version of a building normallly made of stone with lots of fine details like a cathedral it wouldn’t be considered brutalism just because it was all concrete.

                • someguy3@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You can see the texture of a wall from hundreds of yards away? You have better vision than I do Legolas.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s a building in my hometown with this stuff. I have vivid memories of scraping against it on my bike. Over 20 years later my heart still jumps if I pass this dreaded material

      • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s kinda okay, but some cheap white (or any other color!) paint would absolutely be an improvement in my eyes. I’ve yet to see an example (and at this point I don’t think there is any), where paint over otherwise okay brutalist architecture would improve things. Bare Concrete is just an ugly and unfinished look.

      • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well the right hotel looks pretty decent, although seeing just bare concrete makes me want to indulge in suspicously cheap vodka and intoxicate myself for my entire life + depression.

        It has it’s weird charm, like looking back to the awful past of the USSR. These are a great reminder for us eastern europeans to never ever let another communist regime to power.

        • abruptly8951@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Looks like the Barbican in London to me, it’s apartments and a public bar/drinking/working area, nice spot to hang out!

      • mle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        For me personally that looks very interesting if that’s the right word, it pikes my curiousity, but it evokes a very uneasy feeling which would make me want to leave rather than hang around this area.

        Kind of “nothing is allowed here if it’s not with explicit purpose”

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “It’s not brutalism, it’s concrete expressionism!” Or some shit like that.

    I can only think they thought it looked good from a distance, which it still doesn’t but from making a little model it can seem clean and all that.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I find some of the origin story fascinating. Apparently it almost started a war with Libya (2nd link).

    Only the bottom part of the sandcrawler was built for close-up scenes in the Tatooine desert for Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope. In Star Wars: Episode II Attack of the Clones these large vessels appeared on matte paintings. George Lucas took many pictures of the treads of NASA’s space rocket carrier (known as a crawler) as inspiration for the sandcrawler.

    https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Sandcrawler/Legends

    In Jay’s book, the author implies that the original shooting location of the Jawa Sandcrawler may have been a little too close to the Libyan border for Gaddafi’s comfort, because the Libyan government “rushed inspectors across the border to ensure Lucas’s crew wasn’t constructing some newfangled military vehicle.”

    The vehicle’s original design was conceived by Colin Cantwell, and was later redesigned by Ralph McQuarrie, one of the most famous of the Star Wars designers. It was modeled after NASA moon rovers from the time. There were smaller models, of course, used for effects shots, but the bottom half of outsize Sandcrawler — complete with tank treads — was also built to accommodate a notable scene where Luke Skywalker’s uncle buys R2-D2 from the Jawas.

    https://www.slashfilm.com/1257153/star-wars-sand-crawler-mistaken-for-real-military-vehicle-filming-a-new-hope/

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lol I JUST heard this exact reference, image to word, in a “stuff you should know” podcast. They just couldn’t remember the name of the sand crawler.

    Life can be pretty weird, or you heard it too lol