Tim's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
an_onanist@lemmy.world to Political Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

GOP struggling to solve the declining population problem

lemmy.world

external-link
message-square
57
link
fedilink
1
external-link

GOP struggling to solve the declining population problem

lemmy.world

an_onanist@lemmy.world to Political Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
57
link
fedilink
  • d00ery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yep, sorry! I did change the comment.

    Why did women go to work, was it so they could buy more things, to support their family … I don’t know.

    Perhaps it offered a better life then living off the land.

    Women would have worked in the home before having the ‘right’ to work in a factory…

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, that ignores the fact that rich people (who don’t have to work) have less kids and that’s been the case for ages, it just so happens that rich women have access to education and contraceptives and that’s been the case for over a hundred years.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’d have to provide some data about not having to work and birthrates. According to table 2, by far the largest proportion of births is to those who are unclassified. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/articles/anoteonchildbearingbysocioeconomicstatusandcountryofbirthofmother/2016#births-by-socio-economic-status-and-age-of-mothers

        However it doesn’t distinguish between being wealthy, on benefits or perhaps being a student!

        This paper suggests that the fall coincides with the industrial revolution. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44289704?seq=1

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_and_fertility

          It’s a very well known and studied phenomenon.

          • d00ery@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s GDP of the country, and is not related to the number of children born to parents who don’t have to work. It states that rich countries have a lower birth rate.

            ignores the fact that rich people (who don’t have to work) have less kids

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Do you think multimillionaires have to work and that people who make under 25k don’t?

              https://www.statista.com/statistics/241530/birth-rate-by-family-income-in-the-us/

              • d00ery@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                This chart does backup your statement that low income families have the highest birthrate.

                It does not show whether people have to work, which is the point I was disputing (that rich people who don’t have to work have fewer children)

                Looking at the ONS data the percentage of women who’s employment status is ‘unclassified’ is, by far, the largest proportion of women giving birth

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Do

                  You

                  Believe

                  That

                  Multimillionaires

                  NEED

                  To

                  Work

                  ?

                  • d00ery@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Lol, I have no idea, a million isn’t that much if one has a big house, staff, and private jets.

                    I’m not quite sure what your point is?

Political Humor@lemmy.world

politicalhumor@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

  • Be excellent to each other.
  • No harassment.
  • No sexism, racism or bigotry.
  • All arguments should be made in good faith.
  • No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
  • All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
  • No bots, spam or self-promotion.
  • If you want to run a bot, ask first.
  • Site wide rules apply.
  • Have fun.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 12 users / day
  • 24 users / week
  • 341 users / month
  • 713 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 1.27K subscribers
  • 199 Posts
  • 2.84K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Bucky@lemmy.world
  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org