• keegomatic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not only does the article you replied to show that your numbers are completely wrong, but your comment isn’t even internally consistent… 462,657 is like 3% of 16.2 million, not less than 1%. What are you smoking?

      • keegomatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Again, your numbers are completely and totally wrong to begin with, proved by the very article you replied to—I’m just ALSO saying that even using your wildly incorrect numbers you’re still wrong in yet another way