• themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    More like it shows dangers of using only one provider for almost all IT infrastructure.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because cash doesn’t solve the problem. If the stores themselves rely on computers, and they do, it doesn’t matter what’s in your wallet. (In other words, you need more than just cash to have a reliable alternative. It’s certainly possible to do so.)

        Also, some of the big problems were in airports and hospitals where payment was not the serious concern.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Because if everyone used cash, schedule systems, records systems, communication systems around the world, breakdown still.

        If there’s a verity of software vendors used in these systems, and financial systems, you don’t get simultaneous global breakdowns any more.

        Basically. Using cash won’t prevent this from happening. Using several interoperable software providers and systems will.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Using cash won’t prevent this from happening.

          I mean yeah, that’s why I said both, not just cash. I carry some cash on me because you never know. I’d also like to see less monopolization of just about everything because it makes for single points of failure. Diversifying your payment methods by including the potential for cash also helps.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            But cash has nothing to do with this.
            It’s an entirely unrelated issue.
            It could equally be a warning to floss every day for all they’re related.

            • deranger@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              When the payment processor goes down, I can buy my groceries/gas/weed with cash, not by flossing my teeth. I don’t follow the point you’re making. Going fully cashless is a bad idea, and the recent outage didn’t affect every system used. I don’t see how having multiple methods of payment is possibly a bad thing. I’m not advocating for only cash.

              • sibachian@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                this wasn’t a problem with cashless infrastructure tho, this was a problem with monoculture. if the globe stopped using microsoft for gov and business, and instead threw their tax money towards open development; as in - the people, not microsoft, these kind of global issues wouldn’t exist.

              • Steve@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                The inventory and POS systems also go down. You still can’t by your groceries/gas/weed.

                Going cashless is a bad idea. But not because of this.

                • deranger@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  That’s not what I witnessed recently. Payment processors went down but local POS was fine. Inventory didn’t matter with the short duration of the outage. This is one of the reasons going cashless is a bad idea. Far from the only one, but it’s a factor, and I experienced it. Going cashless reduces diversity in payment options and makes the system more vulnerable.

                • ganymede@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Going cashless is a bad idea. But not because of this.

                  It’s pretty clear this incident has highlighted a myriad of very important issues.

                  It’s likely more productive to discuss the other issues in their own threads - this thread is clearly focused on the cashless problem.

        • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Agreed. While I agree with the privacy and security arguments against cashless payment methods, I’m still for them for the simple fact that as someone who works as a cashier for a living (or some semblance of one anyway), I’m more aware than the average public of just how DISGUSTING cash actually is.

            • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Oh gods yes.

              I get so many bills that are dirty, but also you don’t wanna know all the germs that are on a lot of those bills. Another thing I learned from years of working in retail is that people are also disgusting as all hell. Many people don’t bother washing their hands after going to the bathroom, or they’ll hand you nasty sweaty bills they pulled out of their pocket after walking into a store or up to a fuel kiosk during a >80 °F (26 °C) day, or after working a shift in construction or a factory job or even simply just exercising. Some women will pull cash directly out from under their bra, as if I want to accept sweaty boob money. Yes, they could use a wallet. However, many people don’t. Rather, they just shove the cash directly into their pocket or bra and be done with it. Because fuck cashiers, I guess.

              Not to mention that the majority of bills out there have at least some trace amount of cocaine or other drugs covering it, though you may not be able to see it.

              So, in short, sorry for the ramble but, yes, people are absolutely disgusting and so is their cash.

              Retail. has. fucking. ruined me.

              /rant lol

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not necessarily one provider but one point of failure. In this case it was the update system that allowed one company to push something to production on other companies systems.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s more to it. The mono-culture is one thing, but rolling out the update to millions of computers on the same days sounds like a bad idea.

      Fun fact in 2008, with nuclear submarines, the mono-culture was not that bad yet.

      It’s interesting to note the UK went with a Windows XP variant and not Windows Vista, which is marketed as the more reliable OS. The USA never made the same calculations: The American Navy runs on Linux.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    cashless society is a really stupid idea. it’s not worth sacrificing privacy and stability for a tiny bit of convenience.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Does anyone actually want a cashless society though?

      I don’t carry cash for the same reason I don’t carry my socket wrench. I use it for specific things at specific times but I don’t need it day to day. That doesn’t mean I think socket wrenches should be outlawed.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Governments love the idea. It’s much easier to collect taxes or punish dissidents in a cashless society.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, our own government has never said anything about it. If they did propose it I guess our democratic process would find the best way forward. The same could be said of a great many things that will never exist.

          Also collecting taxes ought to be easy and fair. If no one cheats then no one pays too much if they do not cheat. Besides that, there’s plenty of other measures that can be applied in 2024 to diminish tax evasion.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t understand why we can’t have multiple forms of payment. I’ll keep cash and cards so I have options

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Same here. In a more general way, I don’t understand why people can’t simply let things coexist in peace. Just because one doesn’t like or use something, doesn’t mean that others shouldn’t. I’m getting tired of that behavior in our society, to be honest.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Need to send a friend some money? How about you download this proprietary app made by some random company who takes a cut out of the middle. Cash is so outdated we need to use phones for no reason

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          People are shilling something they don’t understand and the regime is taking advantage of their poor education and impulses.

          Adults need to adult. Use cash and educate people around you about risks of cashless.

          Prolly a futile fight but what are we gonna do, give up? Fuck that

          Doing my part.

  • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    One problem no one has mentioned, is that it also makes life a lot harder for homeless people. I guess they need to open a bank account and start writing their account number on a cardboard.

    This actually reminds me of when I went to a restaurant a while ago. I had some physical money to spend, so I figured I’d take it with me and pay with that. At the end of the meal, while my friends paid with a card, I asked if I could pay with cash. Immediately, the waiter’s demeanor changed and he looked almost… disgusted? I don’t even know. Then he asked me in a tone that matched his expression if I didn’t have a card, and I answered something like “Well, I do, but it would be more convenient for me to pay with cash, if that’s okay”. Then he, for some reason, repeated the question, and I answered similarly. He didn’t say anything and just avoided looking at me. While a friend next to me was paying I asked again, “so, can I pay with cash?”, and without looking at me, he just barely shook his head yes. So I paid with cash, and then I awaited my 3€ change back (in my country it’s not usually custom to tip because waiters actually get paid full salaries). Eventually he came back with our receipt, but no change. I just left without saying anything - at this point I wasn’t going to argue about 3€ - but I’m most definitely not coming back to that place.

    Still don’t know what the dude’s problem was, but it did leave me wondering how are homeless people expected to pay for anything, if even a person who isn’t homeless can receive such cold treatment just for choosing to pay with cash.

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      One problem no one has mentioned, is that it also makes life a lot harder for homeless people.

      But to those who organise those systems, they’re not consumers with disposable income or a credit line to spend. They are happy for them to fall through the cracks and people not using cash penalises them further by eradicating charity and widening divisions.

      It is functioning as designed.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s wild

      I would of given that person a piece of my mind. I don’t know about different customs but to me that’s very disrespectful. They would’ve gone with no tip or a very small one. I only tip bigger when they pass the baseline of not being rude.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not sure why you are being downvoted.

        I guess depends what you would have said…

        Either way, in the US you can just remind them they are legally obligated to take cash. Put down the cash, snap a picture and leave.

        If they call police, allow them to explain to a government official how they refused to accept the legal tender in this here country 🐸

        I generally don’t advise schooling staff but this one is disrepect of liberty, and I don’t care, they can get fucked for being a bootlicker.

        Shit is disgusting, your preference on my payment method is not a thing and you are beyond out of line with such behavior. Freedom ain’t free folks

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      One problem no one has mentioned, is that it also makes life a lot harder for homeless people. I guess they need to open a bank account and start writing their account number on a cardboard.

      And you need a permanent address for a bank account. Unfortunately, that’s a feature of the cashless movement not a bug. Anything to make the lives of people experiencing homelessness harder.

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I would have ripped him a new one right there and then in front of everyone. And I would not have asked more than once, I’d just drop my share in cash on the tavel and be done with it.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are more cashless options than using banks.

      In some countries you can use phones (and phone credit, more or less) as your payment option. Doesn’t even have to be a smart phone, though that makes it easier.

      Beggers on the street with QR codes printed out. Or their phone number on cardboard.

      And in other countries, you can use the local equivalent of the Uber app instead of a bank account.

      Cashless is good. Safer for the homeless (harder to rob) and still easy to give money to them.

      • eagertolearn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        To use phones people need to first buy them and regularly recharge them. Homeless people already have hard time to find other necessities.

        Also in some countries you don’t have any option to get any sim card and use it without first registering to your name and your address.

        For the safety aspect yes, it is harder to rob them of their money but the phones are very easy to steal.

        Cashless is only good if you already have some base level of comfort and do not care about your financial privacy. Every cashless transaction you make is recorded, tracked and sold via however many middle man you use.

        I am not saying everyone has to use cash but people should have the freedom to choose how they want to pay.

      • prism@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Username checks out.

        Let me just pull my phone out, download this money transfer app with an abysmal privacy policy. Now let me register an account and input every personal detail known to man. What’s this? I need my government issued ID? I’ll inform the beggar I’ll just pop to my house to grab it. Got my ID, now I’ll complete a liveness test because god forbid that I might be a robot. I may as well send them an ass swab because they need to “know their customer” so well. I just need to link my bank account and enter an OTP that’ll take 5 more minutes to arrive. Finally, I can donate to the beggar after messing around with a poorly printed QR code on a cardboard sign.

        OR I can just pull out my wallet and hand them a $10 note. I’m going to pick the 10 second process with fewer steps over the 30 minute process any day of the week. Having options is important, especially if your phone dies for whatever reason. A cashless society is just a way for card companies and payment processors to continue making a quick buck in the name of convenience. Both card and cash have their uses, and it should be up to the consumer to decide which to use.

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In Europe it’s so much more common to use cash than card anyway, that guy was a fucking weirdo

        • Wilzax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah but most of the continent is under a unifying government with a shared currency (with a few exceptions, but paying in euros implies OP is still under EU jurisdiction)

          Obviously nothing holds true for an entire region that won’t also hold true for the majority of the world, but I feel like businesses in countries that use the euro are FAR more likely to regularly accept payment in cash or even require cash than counties in any part of the Pacific hemisphere

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Then why does my map have a big blob on it that says EUROPE??? Checkmate. King me.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can’t remember which one but credit cards were offline for a time with something and places that still had the carbon paper roller things stashed away took them out and used them. They should keep those things around.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Serious privacy issues around copying cards. That means the store has to retain a physical copy of the full embossed card number.

      There were boxes full of them in the backroom.

        • Truck_kun@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Shop I worked for in 2005… I think … ran cards when the connection was down and took card impressions, and I think the transactions were all auto submitted when the connection came back up.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not sure how much good that’ll be… A lot of banks are giving out cards where the numbers are only printed, I haven’t had one with raised numbers in years.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Would Taler be more resilient than a typical EMV/AmEx card? It’s designed as an online payment system but it’s less centralised, so that could help.

    It’s already an attractive project due to its privacy feature, and due to it being more regulation-friendly that cryptocurrencies. If it’s resilient enough it could act as a digital cash.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      To me Taler is not a cash alternative, but a card alternative, besides cash. It’s better then cards, probably for everyone involved, but it isn’t better than cash.

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you’re against cashless you’re a criminal or a tax evader, which is also criminal.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The ability to pay with cash is great just in case a country’s cashless system(s), especially the one you use the most, goes down for any reason. Gives a backup just in case you need to pay for stuff locally like at a store but your digital money is essentially in limbo until the system(s) is/are fixed.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        How often does that happen though?

        Or… what if the power goes out, you can’t pay with cash or card.

        Honestly if this is the best reason to carry cash then we should be cashless.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why wouldn’t I be able to pay cash without power? If people did it in BCE, I can certainly do it now.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because the equipment used to record sales uses electricity.

            Do you really think the 12yo cashier is going to get out a pad and pen and rithmatic your purchase?

            • Enkrod@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              12yo? What’re your child labor laws? Arithmetic? We’re talking simple addition here. I manned a cash register before, it’s doable even without the computer. Just takes a wee bit longer.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Like drugs have never been bought on card, and money washed through banks…

      It may be the case that people do not want every single step they take to be monitored as it currently is.

      You might not have a phone or be charged per use of card.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Amazon didnt pay a penny in taxes where i live, theyre giant criminals yet they dont need to use cash to evade taxes.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not in favor of a cashless society but looking at how Apple and Google are pushing their wallets (and how practical it is) you guys need to come to piece with the fact that cash might die with the millennial generation. Most Gen X don’t have / want a physical wallet and money needs to be digital.

    With that said, I believe this Crowdstrike fiasco just proved that the biggest threat to IT lies inside the companies themselves and on the managers who decide to use this kind malware without properly understanding the risks. Yes, I’ve said it and I’ll say it again Crowdstrike is malware, anything that messes with Windows at that level is malware, there’s no other description and shouldn’t be allowed by Microsoft to exist.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Im the Xer type with no smartphone and prefers the wallet. I remember so many shows or street people with paranoia would have the horror of government trackers but I find the horror of corporate trackers to be much worse and far to real now.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, those same people totally paranoid about govt tracker are now carrying smartphones around no problem, how ironic isn’t it? :)

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Industry standard solution that protects companies against malware is malware? Any proper AV will have unrestricted access to system. Only other option is for companies to completely lock down your device.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Here’s the thing, malware protection is supposed to deliver protection and one important aspect of that is making sure there’s business continuity… what they did was to completely fuck over their customers in that aspect, they become the problem and I bet that most companies running their solution would never suffer any catastrophic failure this bad if they didn’t run their software at all. No hacker would be able to take down so many systems so fast and so hard.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes. It is.

        Any system with this level of access to the system should be opensource and tested against actual workloads before shipping updates to prod.

        Something like ebpf would make more sense too.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I carry cash and so do many of the younger people I know. It is handy sometimes and happens to be private.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Campaigners say the chaos caused by the global IT outage last week underlines the risk of moving towards a cashless society.

    Supermarkets, banks, pubs, cafes, train stations and airports were all hit by the failure of Microsoft systems on Friday, leaving many unable to accept electronic payments.

    The Payment Choice Alliance (PCA), which campaigns against the move towards a cashless society, lists 23 firms and groups, at least some of whose outlets take only credit or debit cards.

    Cash payments increased for the first time in a decade last year, according to UK Finance, which represents banks.

    The GMB Union said the outage reinforced what it had been saying for years: that “cash is a vital part of how our communities operate”.

    In March, McDonald’s, Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Gregg’s suffered problems with their payment systems.


    The original article contains 416 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, that is not correct. Global outage shows the dangers of centralized systems would be a better headline. Monero Worked all day throughout the entire outage with no problems.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      … And if the systems you actually interact with go down, you can get fucked as well.

      If you want to buy food with Monero and the payment processor for the local shop doesn’t work, even if it’s a local machine sitting in the back office, you still can’t buy anything.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        A local machine sitting in the back office, acting as a payment processor, is much easier to access and fix than the Visa Network.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is not correct, either. The outage even took out decentralized platforms.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Monero isn’t bad but I don’t think it is great for easily buying things. At the end of the day trying to use two different currencies is hard. Also Monero gets a bad name because it is used primarily for illegal transactions. It is simply two complex and has no accountability

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that it’s used for crime means that it actually does what it’s supposed to do and keeping people private. Shoes are also used by bank robbers and we don’t ban shoes. Monero is a tool the same as a hammer or a shoe or a car or a gun.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Define “worked” in this context. You mean their own infrastructure didn’t crash? You certainly didn’t pop down to the store and buying anything useful with Monero 😂

    • Username@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Even central currencies can work if you can make offline and peer to peer payments.

      Not easy to pull off cryptographically, though.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What good is cash gonna do if the networked cash register doesn’t open anymore?

  • prism@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Agreed. I would love to see a law requiring businesses to accept cash where possible. That sort of law already exists at state and local levels in the US, would like to see it adopted in the UK.

  • shikitohno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even cash breaks down pretty quickly in a hypothetical situation where you have something similar occur that lasts for an extended period. When banks’ systems are impacted, how do I get more cash from my account with them when whatever amount I had when the system went down runs out? I haven’t had a physical passbook for an account in a good 20 years.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The economy is so fucked i essentially interact with friends and family on a barter system anyway. I bake them cookies and cakes and they let me use their laundry machines.