I’m making clear my point in multiple ways. You’re still not getting it so lets just end this here.
Back at ya
I’m making clear my point in multiple ways. You’re still not getting it so lets just end this here.
Back at ya
Me: “X does exist for a specific area, its called Fedramp.”
What you’re talking about, and what myself and the author are talking about, are clearly not the same thing.
Where is the difficulty you are encountering in understanding conversational flow?
There are a few dozen ARM distros. Just do a web search for your favorite + ARM.
I don’t know how to help you if you’re not able to see the parent post which is quote in the article
I don’t know how to help you if can’t see that’s nowhere to be found.
It has this important line which we’re discussing in this thread.
That word is not there either.
The word it does have is “could”, meaning does not currently.
it should be easy for you to cite a company that got Fedramp work without being Fedramp certified
Once again, no one is talking about " fedramp" but the entire article goes into detail about the subject of government requirements for contractors that don’t exist. Maybe give it a look.
Its the whole point of this point in this thread.
Weird that the article never even mentions it’s own subject…
Or that its about a problem you claim doesn’t exist…
No amount of donor money allows a company to bypass Fedramp compliance for this work.
Oh, honey…
That’s not what anyone is talking about and you know it. Everyone knows what “tech company” means colloquially.
Mullvad is great but also breaks ~20% of sites.
So many places online don’t accept any form of payment except PayPal.
I have to disagree for 2 reasons:
What’s the alternative? We cant evaluate browsers in a vacuum.
Every browser is supported by ads. Advertising has been a part of Firefox since its inception. Im not sure why people are only just now realizing this, I’ve been saying it for years. I dont know that there’s another feasible way to fund development.
We can easily recommend one of the many Firefox forks. Personally I’ve been enjoying Zen browser, which has telemetry disabled and cannot be enabled.
Otherwise we’ll have to wait for Ladybird to be finished.
I dunno what “Fedramp compliant” means? Presumably Apple and Google aren’t bidding for these contracts, which are the ones with the power to change the industry.
I don’t know what any of that has to do with what I said.
Lots of things benefit from standards but corporations don’t, which is why they invent their own and don’t allow for interoperability.
If this was a custom off-road build I’d be impressed but there’s absolutely not enough people who both need and can afford this to justify it’s existence.
You can put a new permanent low price. You just can’t market it as “on sale” or otherwise discounted.
Not that I care but clearly a lot of people appreciate the increased performance and resolution that other handhelds offer. And the vast majority of games don’t need touchpads.
This has nothing to do with the gaming industry, specifically. This is a basic (very effective) marketing strategy. But typically federal regulations prohibit them from advertising something as “on sale” perpetually so it has to be advertised at retail price for x% of the time.
Except the tech companies are among the politicians’ biggest “donors”.
They say that it feels like a 125" screen but its actually like having a smartphone held against your face. Also the edges are all fuzzy, if they’re even visible.
I don’t think there’s a reality where advertising disappears entirely. However I do think there is one where advertising is simply less-invasive, which is what companies like Mozilla, Brave, and Ad Nauseum advocate for.