• Noble Shift@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fuck you guys. Communism is the best idea ever for a government. I’ll list every place Communism has worked …

    1 - uuhhhhh … hmmmmm

    1 - uuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh … Well shit I guess you guys are right. Communism fucking sucks and communists are idiots.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hey.

      Finland here. Socialism is pretty fucking great.

      How’s it going in America, the bastion of capitalism, where there is no parental leave, limited sick days, at-will firing, cities are overcrowded with human excrement from homeless people who still have actual jobs, for profit prisons forcing people to slave away for years because of mandatory minimum sentencing, and all that other good shit?

      Communism might not work until we get to a Star Trek style utopia, but socialism definitely does. Capitalism doesn’t have a monopoly on market economies.

      Market socialism is just the same thing as capitalism, just with less poor quality products, good labour laws, no horribly massive income inequalities, etc.

      But no you go on ahead and defend capitalism as an ideology, I’m sure you’ve read the literature on the subject and know what you’re talking about.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        While I don’t disagree with your main point, to my knowledge Finland is still capitalist, it just has a robust safety net, regulations, and workers’ protections, like most of Europe, and unlike much of the US.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, a lot of people think that, and they’d be wrong.

          We’re a social democracy.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy

          Social democracy is a political, social, and economic philosophy within socialism that supports political and economic democracy and supports a gradualist, reformist and democratic approach towards achieving socialism.

          Learn to separate your notion of “capitalism” from “market economy”. Capitalism is to market economy what cancer is to cell growth. It is that, but it is a malignant form of it that will never ever function in long term, and it’s very clear to anyone who objectively looks at it. Infinite growth on finite materials is literally impossible.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            From the very source you used, the very next sentence:

            In practice, social democracy takes a form of socially managed welfare capitalism,

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah I’m pretty sure that wasn’t there the last time I read about that.

              It’s a highly contested article, because people hate admitting that socialism is better than capitalism.

              But when you look at the ideologies prescriptively, socialism is about the welfare of everyone in said society, while capitalism is about accumulating capital, at whatever cost. These are mutually exclusive objectives.

              Thus, it’s unerasonable to say that there’s a “form of capitalism that isn’t capitalism but actually is more like socialism but it’s not actually socialism it’s just well managed capitalism”, because capitalism by itself is unmanaged. Capitalism seeks to get rid of any regulation. Capitalism seeks to have the most profit for the least cost. This ideology conflicts with making good products and treating your employees well.

              There’s no such thing anywhere as unrestricted capitalism. Even the US, the very center of the modern capitalist movement, isn’t “purely” capitalist. If if was, it wouldn’t have socialist policies like the antitrust laws.. But it has to, because without those, the economy would collapse, because capitalism is self-defeating, just like cancer..

      • Noble Shift@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Socialism and what the world ‘uses’ as communism are very different. I mean China - Cuba are considered communist, but I’ve personally been to Cuba, and that’s not what Marx was speaking of. China, well you can just Google it.

        Finland is rad as fuck. The Finns I’ve met 100% could sleep on my couch any day. Plus your hacking scene is outrageous. I in fact have one of my VPSs in Finland. So I’m not knocking you guys, and even if the text book definitions perfectly matched up, real world usage differs.

        If we could turn America into a Social Democracy I would wet my pants. I never defended capitalism btw, you tried to put an awful lot of words in my mouth, maybe you’re the 1st Fin I don’t like.

        Anyways have a lovely weekend.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not saying you’re necessarily defending it even if I think you’re wrongly equating capitalism and market economy.

          I just feel that for the most part, basically the “Red Scare” made people think that the only thing that’s an alternative to capitalism is full blown communism, which implies that all market economies are capitalist, which they aren’t.

          I’m not blaming you — I’m blaming some of the implications of the language you’ve used. There is a difference.

          Yeah, there’s a lot of good things about Finland when comparing internationally, but I can tell you, there are some rather bad things as well. While “first amendment auditors” in the US are sometimes annoying as fuck, we honestly need a little bit of that type of spirit here. We’ve got authoritarian issues. Honestly.

          https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland/finland-news/domestic/25412-hs-most-finns-would-accept-human-rights-violations-to-enforce-border-act.html

          https://unric.org/en/finland-must-address-legacy-of-human-rights-violations-against-sami-people-says-un-expert/

          https://harvardpolitics.com/nordic-racism/

          I’d just like to live somewhere else for a while, maybe that might give me a newfound respect to licking some boots or something, as currently respecting the Finnish police- and justice system in general is a very nauseating idea indeed.

          My point is that adopting socialism would make the poor richer and the megarich poorer, and if it’s just socialism, a “market socialism”, not a “communism”, if you will, then nothing would really change for most of the people. Well, nothing would change to be more negative at least. The megawealthy would still be rich, but they wouldn’t be as disgustingly rich as now. Homelessness or hunger wouldn’t exist. But still a lot of people basically consider “socialism” to be a curse-word?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Some Tankies have told me more than once that Cuba and China are on the path to communism and the fact that they get more capitalist every day is proof of that somehow.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The issue is not the broader idea of communism, but the idea that making a fascist state will lead to communism, as MLs believe. We’ve quite clearly seen that doesn’t work. It just makes fascist states.