• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like where biden pointed out trump is only 2 years younger and in worse health. Yeah the other old man spewing bs looked a whole lot better than the old man who had to think about what he says and the facts around it.

  • Savaran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Vote for administrations not single candidates. Trump and his previous administration, and future administration are clearly rotten to the core on every single subject.

    Biden can be old and his administration is still one of the best this country has had. Sure it’s not perfect but none of them will be perfect for everyone, but only one of these two groups is interested in making sure anyone can even try to vote for closer to perfect again in the future. Trump’s entire group has made it plain that even if there’s voting in the future it will only be for those they deem worthy (rich enough) for the privilege. That alone is enough to vote for the Democrats this round.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That alone is enough to vote for the Democrats this round.

      I disagree. Dems have to do better than “vote for our clearly-terrible-but-less-terrible-than-the-other-terrible guy”. Their messaging is bad. The attacking of people who aren’t convinced to vote for Joe Biden is bad. The “shut up and fall in line” attitude is bad.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t ignore it. Just be happy to not have turbo-mega-genocide with nuking of hurricanes on top.

  • nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What does “may not be able to salvage his candidacy” mean in this case?

    “may not win” or “may not run”?

  • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t get why people say that he should stay in the race at this point. He’s going to lose. The best bet is to kick him to the curb and get a better candidate. One who’s not 120 years old and is wholly unlikable.

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Kamala Harris is the only one I could see being a replacement, but it might be too late for that switch to actually work. Then again, it would be too late for any switch to actually work in that case, so I guess we’d have to hope that Americans would willingly vote in a mixed Black & Asian American woman as president. Considering most of the population are probably sexist enough for it to affect their voting patterns, on top of 70% of the population being white and mostly also probably having a subconscious racial bias affecting their voting, I don’t have much hope with that working even if they did do it…

      I would say “if Roe vs. Wade made most women realized how close to danger they are in this election, it could work”, but if that were the case then they’d already be voting blue no matter who. So idk, all it takes is for like 60% of white people to vote Republican to elect Trump as long as they win key swing states. The only way to prevent that from happening is mobilizing the non-white voterbase & the progressive women voterbase in important states, like what happened in Georgia in the 2020 election. But with progressive voters seeming extremely disillusioned with Democrats now, might not happen.

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It might be a bit early, but I could see AOC stepping up if the Dems were to put a huge campaign behind her.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      No matter who the candidate is, the media, and the GOP, and Trump, will still all ignore Trump’s entirely disqualifing attributes while attacking the Democrat over superficial bullshit. The media isn’t talking about right after Trump was found guilty he recieved the biggest donations in US history, or who is dumping millions into his operation. They aren’t covering Trump’s stump speeches full of absolute bullshit, I don’t think they’re even talking about him trying to disown project 2024 because of its obvious fascism, which apparently even his voters don’t like when it’s overly about over throwing the US government to install a dictator and privatization of the entire country’s resources for the ultra rich.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah, a piece of me is concerned that if Biden drops out now, Kamala will have to start campaigning “from scratch”, which is a setback.

    But the way things are now, it’s probably best if we just rip the Biden band-aid off now and do a Democrat party campaign reset. And the sooner the better. Kamala needs as much time to make up for Biden’s blunders as possible.

    Also, honestly, the mistake that put us in this position happened in 2020. Biden never should have run for his first term. Because where we find ourselves now is the inevitable result of him having won his first term in 2020.

    God. Kamala is under 60. What a breath of fresh air that would be.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      But the way things are now, it’s probably best if we just rip the Biden band-aid off now and do a Democrat party campaign reset. And the sooner the better. Kamala needs as much time to make up for Biden’s blunders as possible.

      The real problem with Biden isn’t the blunders he has committed so far, but the blunders he’s yet going to commit.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it’s Kamala, she legally can keep/use all the campaign cash raised for Biden’s re-election too since her name is on the ticket Biden/Harris 2024.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It was absolutely good that Biden run in 2020. His familiarity with the office allowed him to run the country from day 1 (remember how trump was blocking handover and didn’t help with transition of power?)

      Biden doing foreign policy for Obama helped him tremendously with repairing all the relationships (he personally knew most of the politicians) that trump damaged and restoring NATO. Putin started invasion, because he was doubting that Biden will be able to bring NATO together in time (the invasion happened in February 2022, but or intelligence disclosed that they observed preparations as early as April 2021)

      I don’t think anyone else from the 20 candidates we had in 2020 was capable of pulling this. Not because I don’t think they would be bad presidents, but because they would need time to ramp up

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Biden running in 2020 was a good decision. But he shouldve stepped down after like he promised. Whoever came next would have the legitimacy afforded by a proper primary, instead of being a crapshoot as swapping in Harris this late would be

        • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          All I am saying is fuck the cop. The Democratic Party is getting what it deserves for everything it did to get to where it is today.

            • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Cool beans, I hope trump isn’t voted for then for your sake. Not sure why me saying I prefer biden over kamala makes a difference right now to you.

                • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Okay cool beans I guess I like Kamala more, I’m voting for her now instead of Biden thanks for the help!

          • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah! You show 'em!

            I’m 100% sure your personal outrage and principles are the keys to 2024. Just squint super hard, focus on your very narrow perspective and ignore the bigger picture. That’s the ticket! What could possibly go wrong?

        • AxiomPraxis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          AFAIK they are referring to her prior job as Attorney General of California, literally working with the police, people seem to equate it to her being a cop herself.

          • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            oh yes I did not enjoy her prosecutorial work either but unusual nickname for a lawyer. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt

  • superfes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Man, I’m running out of fucks to give, I couldn’t care less at this point, my vote is anti-fascist whatever happens

    Can we just get there already?

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The nearly endless campaign cycle seems tailor-made to wear us out. Wouldn’t it be nice to have it for two weeks max and then vote and be done with it? Everyone already knows how they’re gonna vote, don’t they?

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You needed that much time before TV to travel the US because it was so large. With the information overload age, that is definitely not a problem anymore as everyone can see every rally and debate remotely

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Their territory is also extremely small though so I’m a week you can cover a lot of places to hold assemblies. Candidates will still want to show up in most States at least once so a month and a half is pretty much the minimum…

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Their territory is also extremely small

            Other way around. At 4th largest and 3rd most populated country in the world, the US is extremely oversized and should really be broken up like the banks should.

            Candidates will still want to show up in most States at least once

            Which is just empty pandering that most voters see right through.

            If asked whether they would prefer a campaign stop or an extra week working on policy that helps their state, reasonable people choose the latter every time.

            • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              You’ve made assumptions that I think matter.

              many voters see right through that

              Yeah but the voters who don’t, the voters who can change their mind, are the ones who need that. They’re not doing it for the 90% who see through that, they’re trying to convince the last 10% to vote for them.

              reasonable people choose [better policy] every time

              Same thing. They’re not going after reasonable people. We’ve see recently how many people don’t care about policy and only care about how the character is displayed

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  USA: 9 525 067 km²

                  France: 549 087 km² (5.7% of USA)

                  UK: 243 610 km² (2.6% of USA)

                  There’s a reason why the last two can easily be covered in two weeks of electoral campaigning. They are small.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Which is just empty pandering that most voters see right through.

              Even if this is true, it is false. This is what lost Hillary her election. She took some easy blue states for granted and they gave us Trump instead.

              Empty pandering, sure, absolutely. But voters need to see the person they’re electing. They need that person to come to their area and tell them that they know we exist. The personal touch will make or break a real election, and that’s because humans are dumb, panicky, emotional animals.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe if the news had talked about someone besides Trump sometime in the last decade we’d be better informed.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          like you were informed before TFG ran for office…? or were they talking about him then too?

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not sure what TFG means. I would consider myself fairly well informed prior to Trump getting elected. Presidents still got the lion’s share of coverage but I was fairly aware of what a lot of other political figures were doing. Since Trump was running against Hillary practically everything in US politics is about him or relating to him in some way. I still try to read news every day but it’s incredibly frustrating with how much coverage that orange POS gets.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              weird you switched from “we” in your previous comment to “I” here. my point was the US voters were never well informed. be it reelecting W, or picking the original celebrity president Reagan with an insane landslide, a brilliant move that would ruin the country for generations to come.

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’d vote for a mountain over a fascist every day of the week. And twice on Sundays.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s great and all

        But were talking about winning an election.

        A pretty serious election…

        Can we try not doing it with both hands tied behind our back?

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        as you should. and of course you would, though the question is whether the American people in general will, especially considering the incredibly democratic elections you have where it doesn’t matter which candidate has the most votes.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Lol. Such a ridiculous take.

        So at the time people with private access were swearing up and down the emperor had clothes, the people voted in a ‘primary’ where the only opposition was someone no one had ever heard of with no media budget and with no debates between the candidates, and voted for the allegedly clothed emperor.

        Then the emperor showed up stark naked to a debate, everyone saw with their own eyes, and people are freaking out.

        But no, naked dude is definitely what “the people” want.

        Do commenters regurgitating this stuff even hear themselves?

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bidens age was never a secret. Votes have consequences. People rejected Bernie twice, now live with the consequences.

          Same for the Republicans, they could have had Bush 2, Rubio, Kaisich, Hailey or even Cruz, they chose the criminal ignorant clown.

  • THCDenton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Homie I know said he was worked on an announcement for a replacement candidate. But it was not aired. He would not say the replacements name, but he said it was not Newsom. Sounds like Biden was on the fence about quitting.