• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Those are fascist things, but they do not make fascism. Dictatorial rule is pretty core to fascism. Yes, it shares similarities to fascism, but it is not fascist. It also shares traits with a ton of other political idiologies that it does not totally meet the definition of.

    For an example of insufficient conditions, Skyrim is a first person game where you fight enemies, sometimes while shooting. It is not a first person shooter though, even though they share traits it it. You must meet all traits to be that thing, not just some of them.

    • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I think at this point we’re just begging the question. I think if fascists could get what they want and call it democracy. They would do that. Throughout most of American history with rare exceptions our “democracy” has been captured by capitalists/corporate interests.

      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. — Benito Mussolini

      If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck then it’s a fucking duck.

      Look if this is something that makes people who still hold onto American exceptionalism uncomfortable then I would say perhaps America has not “always” been fascist. There have been times of exception. However those have been the exception rather than the norm.

      Basically the only exceptions have been during times of intense civil unrest. During the civil war, the civil rights movement and, perhaps WWII on an international level.

      The BLM protests were the largest movement of political unrest in american history. We got Nancy Pelosi kneeling in kente cloth and Joe Biden as president in response. The question remains if the U.S. can shed what remains of its fascist history.