• daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So, we have an imperialism which has both historically been in place around the globe and constantly been effecting an in-group, which exists internal to borders, and an out-group, outside them. We also have a couple different in and out groups within the US. Black people, Native americans, you name a racial minority, we’ve done fucked up shit to them. So, pretty textbook so far. Violent military expansionism, imperialism, and high levels of domestic racism is what most people would probably tally up fascism to be as, colloquially. They might not even pick up on a dictator being a central component. We also have corporate capture, which is pretty solidly the case in america. We have an erosion of public utilities and infrastucture. We have a police state. Fervent nationalism, controlled mass media, blatant theocratic intervention, you know, we have all the classic markers of pretty much all the definitions.

    The only qualification I can cook up is that we’re presumably a “democracy”, right, which I didn’t really even think of as being a requirement. You can have a fascist democracy, it’s just a democracy where not everyone can vote, which has always been a kind of tenuous characteristic of democracy at best. We went from wealthy, white male land owners being the ones to vote, to rapidly most everyone being able to vote, actually fairly recently, in the grand history of the US. Especially horrible once you factor in gerrymandering, segregation, white flight, and redlining, which means that the average black voter had much less say (and still does have much less say) than your average white voter. We also elect people, who elect people, with more or less vote weight on both a local basis through gerrymandering and more or less weight on a per state basis through the electoral college, in a fptp system, where a kind of nash equilibrium ensures that there’s only gonna ever be two viable parties or candidates in local, state, or federal elections, for pretty much the majority of america.

    So, we’re a “democracy”, but I would say that we’re only a democracy insofar as a 5 month old fetus could be considered a human. We might consider athens to have been a “democracy”, too, right, according to the formal definition, but if only white male landowners can vote, then that’s already such a subset of the population that you might legitimately be closer to an oligarchy at that point. And both an oligarchy and a democracy can be plenty fascist. Hell, the germans arrived at their fascism through mostly totally legitimate democratic processes.

    So, I mean, yeah, america’s pretty much always been a fascist country, sorry to break it to ya.

  • aliteral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We could start by agreeing on the definition of the term. Because 30s fascism is no more, and that is a fact. What constitutes fascism in todays world? As an Argentinian, the USA meddled with my country via dictatorship whthin operation Condor. That amounts to fascism, or at least, a subtype of it. I think Frank Zappa warned us about this…

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s authoritarian tribalism based on nationality. In other words the forced elimination of opposition, because of the belief in one’s superiority. And since one’s superiority derives from their nationality, it inevitably has to include some traditional values. Any in fighting is just arguing over the meaning of their nationality. I don’t understand what people don’t understand or how they keep getting it wrong.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unfortunately much of the world is going in the same direction… really worrying to see. A third great war seems inevitable in our lifetimes

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Tell me that you don’t know what fascism is without telling me you don’t know what real fascism.

    What the USA has been for a long time is an oligarchy, and there are literal Princeton studies to support it. It’s only now that it’s following Russia into becoming full-fledged dictatorships.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, Trump’s movement is fascist, and I’m sure that we’ll be in some kind of fascistic autocracy if he wins the election, but I think what this meme is trying to describe is imperialism, not fascism.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That would make sense, imperialism and colonialism go hand in hand. Maybe fascism is the inevitable consequence of when expansion is no longer possible and the imperialism and its faux patriotism turns inward.

  • lulztard@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Terrorist shithole doing terrorist shithole things. They had a good run for over a hundred years. I hope Trump burns it to the ground.

      • lulztard@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Like everyone in the nations the US turned into shitholes? They might actually.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        As if the world gives a fuck about the innocent.

        We (the lucky ones) exploit every vulnerable country there is, but pat ourselves on our backs for having ‘humanity’. Child labour, slavery, inhumane conditions in almost every supply chain.

        Forget about the 3rd world, how about US outlawing being homeless?

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re just casualties of his war of principles. He might as well be a billionaire - he’s calling for the war but it won’t really affect him and he doesn’t care who it hurts. He’ll just watch from his couch while eating popcorn.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Be me

      Moran (sic)

      “Lmao, when the US collapses, they totally won’t make it everyone’s problem”

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Imagine it looking like Russia’s collapse if Russia’s military was the most expensive in the world with the among the best logistics, and 800 military bases across 70 countries. That’s about the future of it.

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s so funny to me as a European that, to explain evil to US citizens, all you need to do is to swap “US” for “Russia” and suddenly everyone understands

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      America is sitting on enough nuclear ordinance to end the earths period of habitability… if she falls then who knows what happens with those nukes, is that really a future you want to risk?

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          No but we have to be very careful about handling Russia because of it. The world was terrified when the Soviet Union collapsed because of all the nuclear ordinance they were sitting on now being potentially insecure. Luckily it didn’t get dispersed and used by random warlords fighting in a power vacuum, that time, there’s no guarantee the same happens if Russia or America fail as states now

          • lulztard@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The US losing their hegemony doesn’t mean the US collapsing. Can, though. Still, an end in horror is preferable to an horror without end. It’s hard to justify a terrorist nation with there might be more terrorism while it crashes.

            • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I mean, I don’t want the world ending in nuclear fire, no matter the alternative.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        People seem to forget that we actually maintain those things, and we are the only ones that have ever used one, well two. The only way the American collapse goes softly for the rest of the world is under a liberal or leftist government. They’ll focus internally. Trump literally tried to use nukes multiple times in his last administration.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Even if a collapsing America doesn’t use it, I would be very concerned about all of it ending up in the hands of whatever successor state(s) and what they might do with it. A major concern of the world with the Soviet Union collapse was the status of the nukes and making sure random warlords and terrorist groups didn’t somehow get ahold of the nukes or fissile materials from the nukes since they likely couldn’t attain the nuke and launch code

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you under the impression that Trump’s destruction of the US won’t involve him doing 10 times more terroristic things all over the world?

      Or that the powers that will invade the power vacuum left by a US collapse wouldn’t instantly start resuming the exact same terrorism, and worse, that you are (with every righteous reason) opposing when the US is doing it?

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The US has been continually committing terrorist acts (or enabling them) around the world for at least the last 70 years.

        If the US is collapsing, perhaps they will have to let up a little and focus on its own civil war and take the boot off of the developing world somewhat.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          No one will argue that the US hasn’t been committing terrorist acts and war crimes since before its inception. We literally started a revolution to form the country. Our founding fathers grew hemp and marijuana, and they wrote about sorting seeds for potency, they also were gun runners.

          You really don’t want the US to collapse under a fascist government. We’re headed for a collapse either way, but the boot only comes off if the fascists aren’t in charge of the most expensive and capable military in the world. We actually maintain our nukes, and I don’t want someone that has already tried to use them getting his hands on those again. If we fall to fascists they will strike out and start WWIII. They don’t care about fallout of any kind, political or nuclear.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        He must be in the “but I did nothing, for I was not _____” stage.

        A lot of people seem to be under the impression that if open fascists spouting fascist rhetoric at every opportunity take full control of THE MOST EXPENSIVE MILITARY IN THE WORLD, that it will just self-implode into a nice neat little controlled demolition.

        Lmao that is naive at best. And actually wishing for it is downright stupid. I don’t want Russia to collapse and kill itself, I want the scum leading their politics and militaries to be dealt with in the only manner befitting such filth. Anyone wishing different for the US or Russia, or ANY current or former world superpower that still has massive amounts of sway and firepower, is just wishing for collateral damage.

        When shit hits the fan, it goes everywhere. When their backs are against a wall, they will strike out and take what they want, to hell with the fallout. Possibly literal.

        A sad number of people just go “[large country] bad lol die” like their lives will be unaffected by such a massive global power shift.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          100% right. It is the temptation for easy solutions.

          Turns out all that was needed to eliminate war and oppression was to pick out one semi-democratic country that’s doing it, and don’t vote in their elections, and bingo! Fascists take over, country collapses, no war and oppression anymore. I am amazed it was so easy the whole time and people were wasting their time with all these other more complicated structures and efforts to get it done.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        the power vacuum

        power vacuums are fictions created by intelligence agencies to justify propping up regimes. they are not inevitable natural phenomena

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        they admin the instance with (last i checked) the largest lemmy community (c/piracy). does your mommy know you can’t read?

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And this is why the right accuses us of misusing the word fascist. No it wasn’t “always” fascist.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        they even copied the segregation tactics the us was using against blacks, except they used it against jews.

        it was rightly treated as worth of national shame for generations for nazis, but when it comes to the us it was just an oopsie sorry but we aint doing it anymore. except they kind of are at home and moreso abroad.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t really prove much. If the meme said “the US has always beaten down its minorities” or something like that, we wouldn’t be quibbling over the wording here.

        • kora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m sorry but how is that unique to the US, that’s literally all of human history and all humans in human history have always had an “other’”.

          What makes the US of any more note, if anything, is just the level and formalization of such disgraceful treatment of the “other” that, started with the colonialization of America and the slave trade that boosted it.

          Do I think it could be said that this is not the first time that such a thing has happened in history? It’s just this cycle, who knows how long these Cycles go, and hopefully it’s when we eventually evolve to get off of.

      • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That still doesn’t prove the claim “America was always fascist”

        Partially because being copied by the Nazis doesn’t intrinsically mean you’re fascist (they copied a hell of a lot of things, including but not limited to fascism)

        And partially because that doesn’t cover the “always” part at all

        • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If it was fascist at that time, would it have been less fascist when America had legal, designated concentration camps of black slaves?

          I understand the instict to dismiss it and maybe “always” will be a step too far but i think a lot of Americans are in denial the extensive cross over between early 20th century USA and nazi Germany. I’m not even just talking about how hitler literally based the Jewish ghettos and anti Jewish laws on the black ghettos and Jim crow or Germany’s Eastern expansion and extermination for land being modeled on Americas Western expansion:

          The economics of fascism is croney capitalism, with mass privatisation of public assets, ultra low tax for the rich, pitiful wages and endless toil for everyone else, huge corporate subsidies, handouts to the rich and a merger of the corporate and the state. Some of the state might even be outsourced. Whatever way they set it up, the result was always that.

          I’m not even saying that from a presumed position of my country being better. I’m from the UK and the East India company/royal west African company being a corporate state is about purest form of fascism you can get. Thats before you get to all the rest of it. Our biggest export is class subjugation.

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I assume you’re referring to couping, as opposed to storing chickens

            Your statement may be true, but also doesn’t prove the original claim

            The definition of fascism is not when someone is racist, or when someone does a coup

            The whole “fascism is when thing I don’t like” is exactly the thing the commenter above me was complaining about

        • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, but in the case of The U.S. the things the Nazis copied were the fascist things.

          The Nazis were inspired by the American Eugenics movement. Fun fact the Eugenics movement was probably more popular in the U.S. than it was in Germany.

          They were also inspired by segregation for black people. I think most people would agree that at the time racial segregation was an improvement over how The U.S. treated black people at the founding of the country; when there was an even more intense form of racial hierarchy in the form of chattel slavery.

          The U.S. was also founded on the genocide of the Native Americans. That continued past the founding in the form of manifest destiny. More fun facts Hitler justified his invasion of Russia in the terms of manifest destiny.

          That’s a short list of some of the fascist things the Nazis took from the U.S. that stretch back to its founding.

          What did the Nazis take from America that wasn’t fascist?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Those are fascist things, but they do not make fascism. Dictatorial rule is pretty core to fascism. Yes, it shares similarities to fascism, but it is not fascist. It also shares traits with a ton of other political idiologies that it does not totally meet the definition of.

            For an example of insufficient conditions, Skyrim is a first person game where you fight enemies, sometimes while shooting. It is not a first person shooter though, even though they share traits it it. You must meet all traits to be that thing, not just some of them.

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I think at this point we’re just begging the question. I think if fascists could get what they want and call it democracy. They would do that. Throughout most of American history with rare exceptions our “democracy” has been captured by capitalists/corporate interests.

              Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. — Benito Mussolini

              If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck then it’s a fucking duck.

              Look if this is something that makes people who still hold onto American exceptionalism uncomfortable then I would say perhaps America has not “always” been fascist. There have been times of exception. However those have been the exception rather than the norm.

              Basically the only exceptions have been during times of intense civil unrest. During the civil war, the civil rights movement and, perhaps WWII on an international level.

              The BLM protests were the largest movement of political unrest in american history. We got Nancy Pelosi kneeling in kente cloth and Joe Biden as president in response. The question remains if the U.S. can shed what remains of its fascist history.

      • Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In art i use tactics by bob ross, am i now as great of a painter as bob ross? Am i now bob ross? No! See how your argument is shit?

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t know why you’re getting down voted. Hitler literally said his looked to the US Army’s genocide of Native Americans as a proof of concept for his own Jewish Holocaust.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      i mean theyve always been openly couping and subjugating the rest of the world. its just been successfull for their own for most of this time.

      as the meme says, its just ran out of space to expand and its now fucking over their own people and allies instead.

      what fascists are doing right now in the us is not much different from what they have been doing to south america, africa and east asia for quite some time now.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Imperialist ≠ fascist

        America was often imperialist, only had periods of fascist political movements and has been transitioning for a while.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          they are not the same thing per se, but imperialism is a fascist strategy. genociding brown people or otherwise oppressing them for money sounds pretty fascistic to me.

          its just that its on a worldwide stage now, so the in-group is even more insulated from seeing it.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Racism is not fascism. Imperialism is not fascism. Nationalism isn’t facism. They are characteristics that sometimes or often lead to facism. Facism has a fairly explicit definition. Things can be a part of each other and overlap each other without being each other.

            If I make a snowman, that doesn’t mean that the carrot is a snowman or every snow sphere is a snowman. You can say that when you see me laying out the carrot with 3 balls of snow and a hat, it is leading to a snowman, but it has not always been a snowman.

            But yes, facism is a huge danger and on the rise all over the world. Not even just in white western countries either.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              when racism, imperialism and nationalism have been a main part of a given country’s identity for decades, yea thats fascism, and its precisely my point here!

              don’t forget US segregation laws inspired the nazi treatment of the jews, and you havent changed much in that aspect since then, honestly. i don’t even need to say anything about nationalism, even americans can see it clear as the day. these things don’t lead to fascism, they are the alarm bells.

              fascism is rising outside the west because of how tight of a grip you have on us and how you meddle with our electoral system (eg. imposing dictatorships on us). milei is widely and openly supported by western institutions. brazil has seen a lot of meddling for bolsonaro to succeed, also somewhat in the open. i could go on about this one.

              • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                What is it with Europeans and making up lies about America to make themselves feel superior?

                Don’t forget US segregation laws inspired the Nazi treatment of thr Jews, and you haven’t changed much since then.

                It’s been 85 years since WWII. I like to think we’ve made at least some social progress in that time. We’ve stopped segregating, for a start. Affirmative action is the latest thing U.S. conservatives are up in arms about which means we must be doing something right. And say what you will about slavery in America but we did not murder them en masse.

                I don’t need to say anything about nationalism. Even Americans see it clear as day.

                I beg to differ. Sure, there’s a certain demographic that loves their guns and their trucks and their flags and their homophobia, but they’re far from the majority. Most Americans I’ve met actively despise them. I’d also question whether nationalists (“my country is the best so your country should become part of mine”) as opposed to patriots (“I love my country and want to work to make it better by copying ideas from yours”) have been present in any meaningful capacity before the Cold War. I’m also not at all sure it was present in any meaningful capacity between the end of the Cold War and 2015.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So I’ve had this issue too, it’s because we can’t agree on the definition.

      I use the definition in the dictionary and based on that, US could fall under it, kind of loosely but technically correct.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which dictionary are you reading? A key component of fascism is a dictatorship. You can argue about controlling oppositional voices or segmentation of society in the US, but a dictatorship is pretty core to fascism in any definition I’ve seen. And yeah, our voting system sucks that still doesn’t make it a dictatorship.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          dictatorship was happening outside their own borders for the longest time. kind of why you guys pay so much money to keep a military almost bigger than every other in the world combined.

          inside the us the blacks have seen the boot way more. ask any awake black person if its been a democracy for them.

          or ask central, south america, africa and east asia if the repeated coups over the decades are anything less than dictatorial.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, that’s grasping really hard. Even if we assume the it isn’t a democracy because voting was unfair, it still isn’t a dictatorship because power was being passed around to different people. Also, outside has nothing to do with the definition of a dictatorship.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              its not. look up your own history of installing brutal dictatorships in the aforementioned places.

              and of bullying the third world into neoliberal capitalism with very exploitative terms or else. it doesnt matter we have “elections” if the us is the one always calling the shots.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Dude, that is not fascism. That’s imperialism. Those are totally different things and Fascists are not the only imperialists, nor are Fascists imperialist by definition. Fascism is something specific, not just “evil” government.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  they do implement fascism out here. both sides of the same coin.

                  fascists are the only ones to practice imperialism to nearly this extent after the industrial revolution.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I was talking about the forceful oppression of opposition. That is an element that has existed in the US for a long time.

          US has had no dictator yet but a president has much more power than a prime minister.

          If you consider fascism to be a spectrum, then US has always had these elements. Dictatorship is basically the end of said spectrum.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Which dictionary are you reading?

          I like Umberto Eco on this one. I’m in my 50s. We’ve checked many of these boxes throughout my life, and for some others you can point to various moments in our history, many but not all of them recent. Certainly enough to satisfy the meme.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_fascism#Umberto_Eco

          https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, those are traits of fascism, not a definition of fascism. Anyway, yeah the US has met many of them throughout its history. So has almost every other nation. The term is useless if you just call everyone fascist. The US has not met most of them at any one particular time. You can’t just take that list and say some traits were met in this period, some others in this other period, etc. and then say they covered all the traits at some point in time so must be fascist. That’s not how that works.

      • ESC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I go straight to the horse’s mouth and take Mussolini’s definition, which is basically corporate capture of governance.

      • Gigasser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Umberto Eco’s Ur Fascism definition I think is pretty good. Often times, the “dictionary definition” isn’t the best definition to use, especially when it comes to topics like political ideologies, which tends to be a bit more complex and nuanced than what can be encompassed in a simple colloquial dictionary definition.

        Imma post the ur fascism aspects here.

        1.“The cult of tradition”, characterized by cultural syncretism, even at the risk of internal contradiction. When all truth has already been revealed by tradition, no new learning can occur, only further interpretation and refinement.

        2.“The rejection of modernism”, which views the rationalistic development of Western culture since the Enlightenment as a descent into depravity. Eco distinguishes this from a rejection of superficial technological advancement, as many fascist regimes cite their industrial potency as proof of the vitality of their system.

        3.“The cult of action for action’s sake”, which dictates that action is of value in itself and should be taken without intellectual reflection. This, says Eco, is connected with anti-intellectualism and irrationalism, and often manifests in attacks on modern culture and science.

        4.“Disagreement is treason” – fascism devalues intellectual discourse and critical reasoning as barriers to action, as well as out of fear that such analysis will expose the contradictions embodied in a syncretistic faith.

        5.“Fear of difference”, which fascism seeks to exploit and exacerbate, often in the form of racism or an appeal against foreigners and immigrants.

        6.“Appeal to a frustrated middle class”, fearing economic pressure from the demands and aspirations of lower social groups.

        7.“Obsession with a plot” and the hyping-up of an enemy threat. This often combines an appeal to xenophobia with a fear of disloyalty and sabotage from marginalized groups living within the society. Eco also cites Pat Robertson’s book The New World Order as a prominent example of a plot obsession.

        8.Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as “at the same time too strong and too weak”. On the one hand, fascists play up the power of certain disfavored elites to encourage in their followers a sense of grievance and humiliation. On the other hand, fascist leaders point to the decadence of those elites as proof of their ultimate feebleness in the face of an overwhelming popular will.

        9.“Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy” because “life is permanent warfare” – there must always be an enemy to fight. Both fascist Germany under Hitler and Italy under Mussolini worked first to organize and clean up their respective countries and then build the war machines that they later intended to and did use, despite Germany being under restrictions of the Versailles treaty to not build a military force. This principle leads to a fundamental contradiction within fascism: the incompatibility of ultimate triumph with perpetual war.

        10.“Contempt for the weak”, which is uncomfortably married to a chauvinistic popular elitism, in which every member of society is superior to outsiders by virtue of belonging to the in-group. Eco sees in these attitudes the root of a deep tension in the fundamentally hierarchical structure of fascist polities, as they encourage leaders to despise their underlings, up to the ultimate leader, who holds the whole country in contempt for having allowed him to overtake it by force.

        10.“Everybody is educated to become a hero”, which leads to the embrace of a cult of death. As Eco observes, “[t]he Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.”

        11.“Machismo”, which sublimates the difficult work of permanent war and heroism into the sexual sphere. Fascists thus hold “both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality”.

        12.“Selective populism” – the people, conceived monolithically, have a common will, distinct from and superior to the viewpoint of any individual. As no mass of people can ever be truly unanimous, the leader holds himself out as the interpreter of the popular will (though truly he alone dictates it). Fascists use this concept to delegitimize democratic institutions they accuse of “no longer represent[ing] the voice of the people”.

        13.“Newspeak” – fascism employs and promotes an impoverished vocabulary in order to limit critical reasoning.

        Edit: numbered

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I should have scrolled further before replying. IMO you nailed it. Umberto Eco is my go-to whenever this comes up.

  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    brain dead take.

    Always a racist slave state? sure. A military cult since like 1910? sure. A broken oligarchy? sure.

    Fascist? defs heading that way. Not always.

  • 33550336@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And this is why 405000 Americans lost lives fighting against nazism and Japan imperialism? I do not belive how this is both offensive and stupid.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They did it to uphold Anglo imperialism. That’s why they intentionally let the Holocaust happen and were fully prepared to integrate Nazi Germany into the international order after their invasion of Poland.

      Also why they spent the next 60 years fighting to keep colonies from gaining independence.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I seriously recommend you to read about imperialism. Imperialist nations (i.e. late stage capitalistic, industrialized nations, with sufficient accumulation of capital and sufficient development of monopolies, trusts and cartels, to the point of the most profitable action being the export of capital to other, poorer nations, with or without the consent of the locals), clash with each other in these attempts to expand their sphere of influence. This happened in WW1, WW2, and we’re seeing it again with the Russian-NATO conflict which led to the Ukraine invasion.

      • 33550336@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        we’re seeing it again with the Russian-NATO conflict which led to the Ukraine invasion

        So it’s the NATO’s fault in your opinion?

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Primarily the Russian government’s fault, but of course NATO is partly at fault. Belonging to NATO isn’t a human right, and the expansion of NATO further east than Germany shouldn’t have taken place. If European countries wanted a military alliance, they should have made their own. I don’t believe I need to preface every comment saying “I wholeheartedly condemn the actions of the fascist Russian government in Ukraine”, which I do, as much as I don’t preface my comment saying “I wholeheartedly condemn the actions of NATO in Iraq”, which I also do.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why should the expansion of NATO past Germany not have happened? No one forces countries to join NATO, they all willfully joined, often having to jump through several hoops to do so.

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              As I said, I know they willfully joined, I’m saying they shouldn’t be allowed to join a military alliance with NATO, the same way I would want China not to create a military alliance and then incorporate Mexico and Canada, even if Mexico and Canada wanted to. Joining a military alliance isn’t a human right.

              • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Actually that is a human right. Countries are free to ally with whatever country they want pending any previous agreements. Eastern European countries made zero promises and had zero obligation to not join NATO. Russia doesn’t have fucking “dibs” on them, just like the US doesn’t have “dibs” on Canada or Mexico. I wouldn’t have a problem with Mexico or Canada willfully joining an alliance with China because that is, in fact, their right to do so. And it would speak volumes to how far relations would have had to deteriorate between them and the US to get there, but that is their right to do so. Maybe if Russia wasn’t such a shitty, untrustworthy neighbor, more countries would be willing to ally with them instead of NATO, but hey, that’s Russia’s problem.

                • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Actually that is a human right

                  Source?

                  Countries are free to ally with whatever country they want pending any previous agreements

                  Free to do so, for sure, I’m not claiming illegality, I’m claiming it’s wrong. It leads historically to escalation, not to mitigation of tensions. Remember the missile crisis

                  Eastern European countries made zero promises and had zero obligation to not join NATO

                  Again, you’re not understanding me for some reason. I’m not putting the blame on those countries, I’m putting the blame on NATO itself. It’s not that these countries shouldn’t want to join a pre-existing military alliance, it’s that a supposedly defensive military alliance shouldn’t incorporate member countries ever closer to the declared enemy of the US of A.

                  I wouldn’t have a problem with Mexico or Canada willfully joining an alliance with China

                  I would have immense problems with China fostering military relations with the neighbouring countries of their geopolitical adversary, and if you don’t, I think you should rethink that.

                  Maybe if Russia wasn’t such a shitty, untrustworthy neighbor, more countries would be willing to ally with them

                  I don’t want any countries to ally militarily with Russia. I fully understand that Russia has a fascist aggressive government and I’m glad I don’t currently live next to it as a Spanish citizen. My whole point is that NATO isn’t a “purely defensive military alliance of independent countries”, it’s an organization subservient to the interests of the USA which has shown no remorse to act on foreign countries which didn’t threat military action against member states of NATO, as was the case in Libya and Yugoslavia, and unofficially in Iraq.

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Right, and the heroic Soviets also fought to combat the evil that were the Nazis, because they were natural enemies, no other reason no… /s (just in case it wasn’t obvious.)

      Being a facist doesn’t stop you from fighting other fascists, especially when those other fascists are fucking with your shit. The only difference until now was that the two parties managed to deadlock each other needing the support of an uncaring populace to gain total power. Once one ultimately wins, this whole “pillar of democracy” thing is over. Having literally only 2 parties for centuries is a bad omen for democracy.

      • 33550336@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In his book How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (2018), Jason Stanley defined fascism as “a cult of the leader who promises national restoration in the face of humiliation brought on by supposed communists, Marxists and minorities and immigrants who are supposedly posing a threat to the character and the history of a nation” and that “The leader proposes that only he can solve it and all of his political opponents are enemies or traitors.”

        While this resonates with trump, could you tell me how this fits to other American presidents? What traits US poses to call it “fascist”?

        • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Before I get to your question…that’s a really weird definition. I mean it excludes most stereotypical fascist regimes, like nazi Germany for example. A communist revolution wasn’t really on their list of fears or even concerns. In Weimar Germany they even shared voters. Most communist party voters became nazi voters once they became a thing, they run on the same platform. It’s in the bloody name, Nazi = National Socialism. This definition seems to deliberately only target America, the US is the only one that goes fucking ape-shit when socialism let alone communist is at all mentioned.

          Anyways, to your question. We weren’t really talking about presidents specifically, tho most of them fit the bill. Both democrats and republicans say the fucking “you’re with me or against me” shit, like really??? The US generally has a rich history of violently shutting down competing powers, be it domestic or abroad (a 2 party system IS NOT natural for a democracy!). American imperialist wars are pretty much build on forcefully spreading American culture at any cost (especially if it involves killing anybody claiming to be socialist or not christian). From a young age US citizens are indoctrinated, the shit where they swear loyalty to the flag every morning is creepy as fuck, also the flash everywhere. Like christ, just look at how Americans treat foreigners. Didn’t even mention the police yet…

          • 33550336@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Both democrats and republicans say the fucking “you’re with me or against me” shit, like really???

            Is this really what makes a fascist? Almost every party in democratic world uses similar rhetorics.

            The US generally has a rich history of violently shutting down competing powers

            This is pretty much 99% of human history

            a 2 party system IS NOT natural for a democracy!

            and what to tell about single party systems, like China? Do you call them fascist too?

            American imperialist wars are pretty much build on forcefully spreading American culture at any cost

            I do not feel forced to watch “Top gun” or eat McDonalds

            (especially if it involves killing anybody claiming to be socialist or not christian)

            thanks god they did not kill Bernie Sanders

            From a young age US citizens are indoctrinated

            like any other fucking country, just look at Chinese schools

            the shit where they swear loyalty to the flag every morning is creepy as fuck

            still, rather weird tradition or aesthetics, not a fascism, for fuck’s sake

            Like christ, just look at how Americans treat foreigners

            they behave like assholes at worst, still millions of foreign people dream about living in USA

            Didn’t even mention the police yet…

            This sucks indeed, but this is not inherent to USA, rather to police in general.

            Summing things up, these accusations about fascism seems completely baseless and using the word “fascism” in the context of US is just making it meaningless and makes impression that US are similar to nazi Germany. US are imperialist at best, but boy, I prefer to live under US empire that fucking russian shithole.

            • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Is this really what makes a fascist? Almost every party in democratic world uses similar rhetorics.

              Nope, predominantly an American quote in the 21st century. And while it doesn’t necessarily make you a fascists, it does check the extreme tribalism flag. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us

              This is pretty much 99% of human history.

              Correct, and modern democracies tried their best to change course. Some more successfully than others. If you want successful examples look at Finland, those guys played a significant role in many peace treaties, including the famous European peace. And here’s the kicker, FOR NOTHING IN RETURN. Or rather no immediate monetary or political gain.

              and what to tell about single party systems, like China? Do you call them fascist too?

              YES, quite literally and unironically YES! Like come on? “Communism with Chinese Characteristics”? We’re just a couple word plays away from “National Socialism”. The Chinese government is actively conducting ethnic cleansing and jailing anybody who isn’t Chinese enough. Come on!

              I do not feel forced to watch “Top gun” or eat McDonalds

              At this point I’m starting to feel you’re a troll, but hey, it’s fun, so let’s keep going xD I was more referring to America’s foreign policy here.

              thanks god they did not kill Bernie Sanders

              Again, mainly meant foreign policy. However Burnie doesn’t get off free either. The democrats didn’t even give him a chance to be a presidential candidate despite being the crowd favorite. The guy’s getting silenced.

              like any other fucking country, just look at Chinese schools

              Not every country, again, look at Finland, Estonia or the Netherlands. Great examples of an education system that respect the people’s freedoms. And while most other European countries have something fucked up, non are anywhere near “KNEEL FOR THE FLAG!” level.

              still, rather weird tradition or aesthetics, not a fascism, for fuck’s sake

              Weird esthetics? Maybe because the esthetic invokes the other counties that did this which most were under either fascism or communism. Like sure, it doesn’t necessarily make you fascists, but role-playing as one every morning is still fucking suspicious.

              they behave like assholes at worst, still millions of foreign people dream about living in USA

              Look in a mirror. The US treats everyone else like a terrorist before they even step foot into the country. And yes, half the people that didn’t go to America yet still think it’s amazing. America is really good at advertising. If America doesn’t want foreigners to dream about it, maybe it could stop advertising it self as the only valid way of life.

              This sucks indeed, but this is not inherent to USA, rather to police in general.

              Kinda, there are some bad apples in other counties too, like France for example. But the US still stands proud and tall for having one of the worst. Literally no other county arrest more people per capita than American. Not even your favorite China. Also having snipers at every protest? Fucking really? Direct military hand downs?

              You say my “accusations”, but most of what I said are statements you didn’t even negate, just said that some of em don’t necessarily make the US fascist and the rest you renamed to “imperialism”, which IS NOT BETTER! The only difference is that imperialism doesn’t need to include nationalism, it’s an umbrella term, under which fascism falls under!

              But boy, it’s funny you’d mention the Russian shithole, considering the US seems rather proactively aiming towards it. The republicans especially seem to have em as their role model. If things keep changing the way they have been for the last 20 years, I give it tops another 30 years before the only thing that makes America better than Russia will be the running water. Maybe faster if the supreme courts keeps up the pace it demonstrated the last 2 weeks.

              • 33550336@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                First of all, I made references to China and Russia because I wrongly assumed that you are a tankie (I perceive the Lefty Memes community as the nest of them). My apologies.

                And while it doesn’t necessarily make you a fascists, it does check the extreme tribalism flag. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us

                While choosing East vs West is by no means comfortable, it is actually true. You made examples of countries like Finland, Estonia or the Netherlands. The last one recently has turned far right, but overall countries like that, including Sweden and Norway are cool and as for me, the rest of the world could be like this, I do not expect more from the world and I saw too much to dream about some communist utopia. Anyway, such cute countries alone cannot compete military and thus geopolitically with behemots like Russia or China (though Sweden and Finland seems to have decent means to defend themselves). And history taught us that since the dawn of humanity the winner is the guy with the bigger stick. Even within NATO, the European countries are rather supporters to US. Therefore, at the global stage, this all boils down to the dichotomy East VS West or NATO (mainly US) VS Russia+Iran+North_Korea+China. In the end of the day, there are only us VS them.

                But boy, it’s funny you’d mention the Russian shithole, considering the US seems rather proactively aiming towards it. The republicans especially seem to have em as their role model.

                This actually scares shit out of me. WTF. I wish they had to live in Russian province for couple of months, that would be a good part of punishment. The US cannot be defended from outside, but only by itself (by republicans, to be precise).

                To the rest of the points I generally agree, but… If you pick only the shittiest parts of this country, you end up with such a picture. Again, I feel it is not right to equate the main trait of Nazi Germany (fascism) to US, who helped to liberate half of the Europe from this brown shit. Even in the case of genocidal China, “authoritarian” seems a more proper word. There is no consensus on definition of fascism, so neither you or I can provide more than such judgments. Back to US, even if it fails to realize the “American Dream” to many, it is RELATIVELY bearable hegemon in the history. And in the jungle, there is always one.

                • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Ey, cheers mate, refreshing to get a composed response!

                  I’d argue there are more sides than just NATO vs China and friends. India often fucks over both sides because both refuse to acknowledge it and its concerns for example. It saddens me that such counties don’t give a shit, but I can’t really fault them too much considering we do the same to them. And such rhetoric only serves as fuel for them to mock us.

                  You’re definitely right that we also need military might to protect our values, as a European I’m disgusted by our inactivity and reliance on the US. On the subject of cute counties, I’d argue Finland isn’t one of em, I’d also add Sweeden just for military reasons while I’m at it. Both have strong militaries with plenty of reserves/mobilization potential, Finland even has nuclear ready bunkers under every major city. So glad we got em in NATO now, hope the rest of Europe catches up soon.

                  And not gonna lie, as much as I shit on America, it’s largely because I’m also sacred. The US is on a slippery slope due to decades of ignorance and if the US goes to shit it’s gonna have far and wide consequences around the globe. I hope the Trump situation will act as a wake up call for us in Europe, and we’ll get our shit together, not only to be self sufficient, but hopefully emerge as a genuine ally for peace and freedom that reaches beyond diplomacy. If America falls and Europe doesn’t get its shit together, that’s good bye for Ukraine and then what? That would set a new standard, a world in which might makes right… No even an attempt at rule of law.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are you saying a country built upon colonization, Genocide and slavery has a systemic problem op oppression?

    We just need to vote harder for Genocide!

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      a country built upon colonization, Genocide and slavery

      Which country wasn’t?

      Probably the two most unusual things about the US are that instead of either absorbing and assimilating, killing off, or enslaving the natives we mostly relocated them and that we imported most of our slaves from overseas instead of primarily enslaving the conquered people(s). I mean those, and we’re one of the later examples of all of it in history.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Which country wasn’t?

        America is an outlier. Concentration camps and intentional shipping Europeans overseas with the intention to colonize an 'unpopulated land (see “thinking the Natives weren’t human”)

        Most of history lands were conquered and populations were absorbed into a kingdom. Occasional Genocides too place but wiping such an area to replace the natives is special. Not to mention it all happened just 250 years ago.

        Adolf Hitler was literally inspired by how America wiped out all the brown natives and replaced them with the white Ubermensch.

      • kora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hadn’t really ever directly connected the two, but yeah the Democratic party has always had problems organizing. Hopefully, if we are forced into a similar situation, we get it right this fucking time.

        No parties like this bullshit two party Winner Takes all bullshit, if we’re going to pretend like democracy is a viable option. If anything can be said of the differences between back then and now, I would guess that overall the Democratic party at least appears to be more humble in the past than it is now despite being humiliated by a clown is such as Trump. The party’s and this country’s eventual downfall I think could be boiled down to everyone that isn’t in the Oligarchy’s Breast Pocket, being unwilling to compromise or even speak their neighbors, who might disagree with them.

        Either the left bites the fucking bullet and humble itself enough to figure out some way of getting through to at least a chunk of the Republican voter base, or get really comfortable with becoming fascist itself and propagating its own brand of violence, to the point of killing.