• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    That they fought harder to stop Bernie from getting the nomination twice than they ever fought against trump speaks volumes. Just because they allow progressives to do a few minimal things, doesn’t mean the party does not serve the rich first and foremost. This is like how freedom of speech is allowed until it becomes a threat to the establishment (see pro-Palestinian protests that were shut down with bullshit excuses). When the possibility arose that Bernie could make actual significant change, the party threw a shitfit.

    The democratic party will never be replaced with progressives because their donors won’t allow it.

    • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That they fought harder to stop Bernie from getting the nomination twice than they ever fought against trump speaks volumes.

      I don’t remember almost every single Democrat bashing Bernie publicly every single time they had the chance like most democrats did with Trump for the last 8 years. Are you not remembering the firestorm of statements from elected officials anytime Trump did something horrific?

      The democratic party will never be replaced with progressives because their donors won’t allow it.

      I bet Malcom X and the Segregationist Democrats would’ve felt the exact same, and yet that last set of reactionary Dems has been completely purged from the party since the 60s.