The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics.

The 25-year-old also remains barred from swimming in the female category after failing to overturn rules introduced by swimming’s governing body in the summer of 2022, which prohibit anyone who has undergone “any part of male puberty” from the female category.

Thomas had argued that those rules should be declared “invalid and unlawful” as they were contrary to the Olympic charter and the World Aquatics constitution.

However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming.

The news was welcomed by World Aquatics, who hailed it as “a major step forward in our efforts to protect women’s sport”.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Can you define male puberty though? Like qualitatively in specific terms and with specific language?

    Being pro trans is being pro women. Excluding some women from women’s sports would be discriminatory to those women. In this case those women are transgender, and they are being excluded because they are transgender. Which would be opposed to their right to participate, a right we recognize for all other women and girls. That would be anti trans, in this specific context. It doesn’t mean you oppose all of trans rights, but you’re actively supporting the exclusion of trans people from professional athletics.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      but you’re actively supporting the exclusion of trans people from professional athletics.

      Where did the person you are replying to say that they couldn’t compete in male professional athletics?

      • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Preventing trans women from competing in women’s sports is a ban on trans women in sports. Trans women do not have testosterone levels anywhere near cis male levels. And none of us are going to degrade ourselves by being categorized as men.

        If you would make trans women compete against men then you’re saying trans women aren’t women. It’s as simple as that.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Where do trans men compete?

          You are saying it would be degrading to have a trans woman compete against men, but a trans man is not allowed to compete against anyone because they are taking a banned substance to transition. Which is more degrading?